Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment, Science and Society ((ENSS,volume 2))

Abstract

It is becoming more and more evident that uncertainty related to future demand and supply of natural environments is one of the key issues in social benefit—cost analysis of these resources. Many environmental problems that our societies face are such by nature that we simply do not know the consequences of our contemporary actions for certain. Take for example the greenhouse effect — both climate and economic changes are highly uncertain. In environmental economics uncertainty has for long been one of the central themes.

I am grateful to the participants of the ESF task force on valuation, risk and uncertainty for their valuable comments. Comments by an anonymous referee have also been very helpful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. and Fisher, A. C. (1974) Environmental preservation, uncertainty and irreversibility, Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, G. and Caballero, R. J. (1992) revised May, Reversibility and Aggregate Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, P. (1975) Option demand and consumer’s surplus: Comment, American Economic Review 45, 733–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, C. J. and Freeman, III, A. M. (1971) Option demand and consumer surplus: Comment, Quarterly Journal of Economics 85, 523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabbé, P. (1986) Valeurs d’option et de quasi-option des ressources naturelles, in P. Gaudet and P. Lasserre (eds.), Ressources naturelles et théorie économique, Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1992) Investment and hysteresis, Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. and Hanemann, W. M. (1986) Option value and the extinction of species, in V. K. Smith (ed.), Advances in Applied Microeconomics, 4, pp. 169–190, JAI Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. and Hanemann, W. M. (1987) Quasi-option value: Some misconceptions dispelled, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. and Hanemann, W. M. (1990) Valuation of tropical forests, paper prepared for the United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research Conference on The Environment and Emerging Development Issues, September 3–7, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. A. (1981) Cost—benefit analysis under uncertainty, American Economic Review 71, 715–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1984) On reconciling different concepts of option value, Working Paper No. 295, Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1989) Information and the concept of option value, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 16, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. (1974) Option values in the economics of irreplaceable assets, Review of Economic Studies: Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, pp. 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevenagel, R. (1994) An assessment of the contingent valuation method, in R. Pethig (ed.), Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, P.-O. (1990) Willingness to pay measures and expectations: An example, Applied Economics 22, 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, P.-O. (1991) Cost—benefit rules in a risky world, unpublished paper, June version.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, P.-O. (1994) Valuation and aggregation, in R. Pethig (ed.), Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M. W. (1992) Paternalistic altruism and the value of statistical life, The Economic Journal 102, 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, D. (1991) Financial and non-financial option valuation, in D. Lund and B. Oksendal (eds.), Stochastic Models and Option Values, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (1990) Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved, paper prepared for the United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research Conference on The Environment and Emerging Development Issues, September 3–7, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1973) Markets for an exchange economy with individual risks, Econometrica 41, 383–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R. (1992) Is sympathy an economic value? Philosophy, economics and the contingent valuation method, in Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Cambridge Economics, Inc., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maler, K.-G. (1984) Risk, uncertainty and the environment, Stockholm School of Economics, mimeographed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pethig, R. (1994) Ecological dynamics and the valuation of environmental change, in R. Pethig (ed.), Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1991) Irreversibility, uncertainty and investment, Journal of Economic Literature XXIX, 1110–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Querner, I. (1994) The need of alternatives to the expected utility approach in environmental risk economics, in R. Pethig (ed.), Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1972) Option demand and consumer’s surplus: Valuing price changes under uncertainty, American Economic Review 62, 814–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechter, M. and Freeman, S. (1994) Some reflections on the definition and measurement of nonuse value, in R. Pethig (ed.), Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1987) Uncertainty, benefit—cost analysis and the treatment of option value, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, Burton A. (1964) Collective-consumption services of individual-consumption goods, Quarterly Journal of Economics 78, 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rüdiger Pethig

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Svento, R. (1994). Welfare Measurement under Uncertainty. In: Pethig, R. (eds) Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues. Environment, Science and Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8317-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8317-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4345-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8317-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics