Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensuality and Ideation

  • Chapter
Synthesis and Intentional Objectivity

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 33))

  • 107 Accesses

Abstract

We shall explore the different texts of Kant and Husserl on the structure of knowledge. The distinction between acts of knowing and knowledge as such is one of the distinctions with which we are concerned. We shall refer to the texts dealing with these aspects, taking into account the component of sensuality and the sensuous data that are central in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie (1923/24), Part I, Kritische Ideengeschichte, ed. R. Boehm (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1956), pp. 228, 357 ff (hereafter cited as “EP“). On the whole issue of A. Gurwitsch, “Der Begriff des Bewusstseins bei Kant und Husserl,” Kant Studien, LV (1964), pp. 410–427. The term “anthropology” is used in this context not in the sense of a theory of the unique features of man or the position of man in the cosmos. It is used as synonymous with “psychology.” Hence the choice is between anthropologism and transcendentalism.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. E. Husserl, “Phenomenology and Anthropology,” trans. Richard G. Schmitt, in Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, ed. M. Chisholm (Glencoe, 1960), pp. 410–427. Kr.d.r.V. B. pp. 38–40; Kemp-Smith’s transl. pp. 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. EP,p. 357 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kr.d.r. V. A, p. 328; Kemp-Smith’s transl. p. 319. B p. 408; p. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 413; transl. p. 372.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 135; transl. p. 154–155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 574; transl. p. 471.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 409; transl. p. 370.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, Ak. Ausgabe Bde V, pp. 7 ff

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kr.d.r.V. B, p. 33; transl. p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erste Philosophie, p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 287.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See H. Scholz, “Das Vermachtnis der Kantischen Lehre von Raum und von Zeit,” Kant Studien, XXIX (1924), p. 21–69.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erste Philosophie, pp. 225–226.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Husserl, Die Krisis der europaeischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phanomenologie, ed. W. Biemel (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1954, p. 203; transl. David Carr, Northwestern University Press, Evanston 1970, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Erste Philosophie, p. 357.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 364.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kr. d. r. V. B, p. 148; p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 160; transl. p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prolegomena zu einer jeden kunfligen Metaphysik, para. 36. One wonders whether there is warrant for Paul Ricoeur’s statement that the Copernican revolution, disengaged from the epistemological hypothesis, “is nothing other than the phenomenological epoche” (Paul Ricoeur, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology, trans. Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree [Evanston, 1967], p. 180). The question is essentially related to the concept of constitution dealt with later in this book.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kant’s Metaphysics of Experience (London, 1965), p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kr.d.r.V. B, p. 68; p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Erste Philosophie, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ideen zu einer reinen Phanomenologie und phanomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, Allgemeine Einfuhrung in die reine Phanomenologie, ed. W. Biemel (The Hague), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., pp. 3 70–371.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Roth, Edmund Husserl’s ethische Untersuchungen, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1960, p. 38; cf. EP, p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vorlesungen zur Phanomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins, Max Niemeyer, Halle a.d.S., 1929; English trans. by James S. Churchill, The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind., 1964), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ideen, pp. 370–371.

    Google Scholar 

  33. . Ibid., p. 368. 33. Cf. Scholz “Das Vermachtnis der Kantischen Lehre von Raum und von Zeit.“ Kant-Studien 1924, pp. 21 ff. A further analysis of these issues is contained in the present author’s Wege zur Erkennbarkeit der Welt, Verlag Karl Alber, Freiburg Munchen, 1983; and Legislation and Exposition, Hegel-Studien Beiheft 24, Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, Bonn, 1984, pp. 37 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kr.d.r.V., p. 33; transl. p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  36. . Ibid., p. 1; p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Prolegomena, para. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kr.d.r.V., p. 68; p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid., p. 3 5 5; p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cartesian Meditations, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kr. d. r. V., p. 404; p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cartesian Meditations, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 23 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid., p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., pp. 104–105.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., p. 52 note.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kr. d. r. V., B, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid., p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Die Krisis, p. 259; p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

    Nathan Rotenstreich

Authors
  1. Nathan Rotenstreich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rotenstreich, N. (1998). Sensuality and Ideation. In: Synthesis and Intentional Objectivity. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8992-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8992-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4997-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8992-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation