Skip to main content

Information Needs for Biodiversity Assessment Derived from International Forestry Discussions

  • Chapter
Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 51))

Abstract

International agreements, initiatives for developing criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management and the public discussion on certification commit all countries to preserve biodiversity and to develop a more balanced management of forest environment. To achieve these goals, most representative natural forests have been totally protected and production forests managed with more nature oriented principles. According to the historical forest use, human impact, forest ownership structure and natural forest development cycle, different forestry practices can be distinguished.

Research on stand level biodiversity aims at developing silvicultural guidelines. Studies on stand structure and dynamic processes play a key role in the description of biodiversity indicators. Further research on stand level is needed in defining the key indicators/parameters for biodiversity with standards (e.g. dead wood component), differences in biodiversity indicators between natural forests and managed forests (naturalness of forests), influence of disturbances on biodiversity indicators, and economic comparisons between biodiversity oriented and wood production oriented silviculture.

At landscape level the most urgent need is to develop forest inventory methods and to monitor the forest ecosystem as a whole. This requires an efficient use of GIS and other techniques to visualise the different forest protection and management units. The forest ecosystem inventory should include, in addition to the traditional forest stand characteristics, assessment of the protection areas (representativeness, geographical location, site classes, age structure, size), location of forest areas with regard to other land use alternatives, key biotopes and other protective zones and watershed management areas. Further development is also needed in the definitions of terms (e.g. forest protection classes, origin of forests) and in the harmonisation of classifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angelstam, P. and Rosenberg, P. 1993. Aldrig, sällan, ibland, ofta. Skog & Forskning 1/93: 34-41. Harmonization of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. FAO/ITTO Expert Consultation. Report. Rome. Italy. 13-16 February 1995. FAO/ITTO. 8 p. + appendixes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Seminar on Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. Background Document August 19-22, 1996. Helsinki. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 131 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interim Report on the Follow-up of the Second Ministerial Conference 1995. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 16-17 June 1993. Helsinki. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland. 255 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouki, J. (ed.) 1994. Biodiversity in the Fennoscandian boreal forests: natural variation and its management. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31(1). 217 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibundgut, H. 1978. Europäische Urwälder der Bergstufe. Bern und Stuttgart. 308 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 16-17 June 1993 in Helsinki 1994. Documents. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland. 56 p. European List of Criteria and Most Suitable Quantitative Indicators. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland. 20 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman R., Parviainen, J. and Stephan, K. 1994. Sustainability. Naturopa. 75: 15 - 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parviainen, J. 1993. Tuli metsän ekologisessa kierrossa. In: Piri, E. (ed.). Tuli metsän ekologisessa kierrossa. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja. 462: 8 - 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parviainen, J. 1994. Finnish Silviculture. Managing for Timber Production and Conservation. Journal of Forestry. 92 (9): 33 - 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parviainen, J. and Seppänen, P. 1994. Metsien ekologinen kestävyys ja metsänkasvatusvaihtoehdot. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 511. 110 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmert, H. 1992. Okosysteme. Springer Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hongkong, Barcelona, Budapest. 363 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Vogt, H. 1991a. Die Fichte 11/3. Parey Verlag. Hamburg - Berlin. 804 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Vogt, H. 1991b. Naturnahe Waldwirtschaft. Wilhelm-Munker-Stiftung (ed.). Beiträge zur Lebensqualität, Walderhaltung und Umweltschutz, Gesundheit, Wandern und Heimatpflege. Heft 31. 56p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, A., Parviainen, J. and Bucking, W. 1994. A review of approaches to forestry research on structure, succession and biodiversity of undisturbed and seminatural forests and woodlands in Europe. Working Paper 3. European Forest Institute. Joensuu. Finland. 62 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustaining the World’s Forests. The Santiago Agreement. Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests 1995. Journal of Forestry. 93 (4): 18 - 21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parviainen, J., Päivinen, R. (1998). Information Needs for Biodiversity Assessment Derived from International Forestry Discussions. In: Bachmann, P., Köhl, M., Päivinen, R. (eds) Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Forestry Sciences, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9006-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9006-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4962-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9006-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics