Skip to main content

Heidegger and the Question of Physics

  • Chapter
Hermeneutics and Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 206))

  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

Heidegger’s position on science and technics has been analyzed in very many papers and essays in a very general philosophical context. Indeed, Heidegger’s hermeneutical criticism of science has been neglected as irrelevant or dangerous by the majority of physicists and philosophers of science.1 On the contrary, recently some works have been developing a first hermeneutical interpretation of science and have also been dealing with Heidegger’ s particular ideas about physics, sometimes by trying a comparison between hermeneutics and the implications of a physical theory like quantum mechanics.2 However, in my opinion, one should neither a priori reject Heidegger’ s criticism of science, nor try to understand science on the ground of any pre-constituted philosophy like hermeneutics. Furthermore, on the one hand the general philosophical analysis has missed an actual deep insight into physics and on the other the specific comparison has been performed within the image of classical and modern physics as reconstructed by the scientific community on a very superficial level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for instance: I. Prigogine & I. Stengers, La Nouvelle Alliance. Métamorphose de la Science Gallimard, Paris 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Rorty, Is Natural Science a Natural Kind?, in Objectivity, Relativism and Truth. Philosophical Papers I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991, pp. 46–62; M. A. Arbib & M. B. Hesse, The Construction of Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1986; T. Winograd & T. Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition, Ablex Pub. Cor., Norwood, New Jersey 1986; C. Chevalley, La Physique de Heidegger, Les études philosophiques, v. 3 (1990), pp. 289311; C. F. von Weizsäcker, Der Garten des Menschlichen, C. Hanser Verlag, München 1977, 19922, pp. 404–431; C. F. von Weizsäcker, Zum Weltbild der Physik, Hirzel, Stuttgart 1957’.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Heidegger, Die Frage nach der Technik, in Vorträge und Aufsätze, Neske, Pfullingen 1954. 4 M. Heidegger, Die Frage nach der Technik, op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Wissenschaft und Besinnung, in Vorträge und…, op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Identität und Differenz, Neske, Pfullingen 1957, 1978: M. Heidegger (1962), Überlieferte Sprache und technische Sprache, Erker, St. Gallen 1989; M. Heidegger (1938), Holzwege, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1950; M. Heidegger (1939), Von Wesen und Begriff der tpvatç Aristoteles, Physik B, 1, in Wegmarken, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1976; M. Heidegger (1931), Aristoteles, Metaphysik Q 1–3. Von Wesen und Wirklichkeit der Kraft, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1981; M. Heidegger (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zur Frage nach der Bestimmung der Sache des Denkens, Erker, St. Gallen 1984; M. Heidegger (1936–40), Nietzsche,Neske, Pfullingen 1961; M. Heidegger (1951–52), Was heisst Denken?, Niemeyer, Tübingen 1954; M. Heidegger (1949–50), Die Kehre, Neske, Pfullingen 1962; M. Heidegger (1949–50), Die Technik und die Kehre, Neske, Pfullingen 1963; M. Heidegger (19511973), Vier Seminare. Zürcher Seminar, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1977; M. Heidegger (1955–56), Der Satz vom Grund, Neske, Pfullingen 1957; M. Heidegger (1935), Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen, Niemeyer, Tübingen 1962; M. Heidegger (1959–69), Zollikoner Seminare. Protokolle-Gespräche-Briefe, ed. by M. Boss, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1987; M. Heidegger (1936–39), Beiträge zur Philosophie (vom Ereignis),Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1989; M. Heidegger, Hebel. Der Hausfreund, Neske, Pfullingen 1957; M. Heidegger (1935), Einführung in die Metaphysik, Niemeyer, Tübingen 19764.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit,Niemeyer, Tübingen 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Heidegger (1962), Zeit und Sein & Protokoll zu einem Seminar über den Vortrag “Zeit und Sein ”, in Zur Sache des Denkens, Niemeyer, Tübingen 1969. See also: M. Heidegger, Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1979; M. Heidegger, Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1975; M. Heidegger (1924), Der Begriff der Zeit, Niemeyer Tübingen 1989; M. Heidegger, Der Zeitbegriff in der Geschichtwissenschaft, in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, CLXI (1916), pp. 1173–188 and reprinted in Frühe Schriften, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1972, pp. 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For such an interpretation, see also: the introduction and notes by G. Vattimo to the Italian translation of M. Heidegger, Vorträge und…, Saggi e discorsi, Mursia, Milano 1976. For a more general interpretation of Heidegger’s philosophy, see for instance: M. Cacciari, Pensiero negativo e razionalizzazione, Marsilio, Venezia 1977; M. Cacciari, Salvezza che cade,in Il Centauro, n. 6 (1982), pp. 70–101; G. Vattimo, Essere,storia e linguaggio in Heidegger, Marietti, Genova 1963; J. Derrida, De la grammatologie, Minuit, Paris 1967; C. Sini, Passare il segno. Semiotica, cosmologia, tecnica, il Saggiatore, Milano 1981; K. O. Apel, Transformation der Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1973, 1976; J. Habermas, Texte und Kontexte, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1991; E. Giannetto, La pratica ermeneutica del dialogos, in Ermeneutica e Filosofia Pratica,ed. by N. De Domenico, A. Escher Di Stefano & G. Puglisi, Marsilio, Venezia 1990, pp. 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Heidegger, Die Frage nach der Technik, op. cit.: translation is mine.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Husserl, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie, in Husserliana, Gesammelte Werke, v. 6, Nijhoff, Den Haag 1954, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Marcuse,One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society Beacon Press, Boston 1964; H. Marcuse On Science and Phenomenology in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science II ed. by R. Cohen & M. Wartofsky, Humanities Press, New York 1965; H. Marcuse, Beiträge zu einer Phänomenologie des Historischen Materialismus, in Philosophische Hefte, v. I (1928), pp. 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Nietzsche, Sämtliche Werke, ed. by G. Colli & M. Montinari, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag/de Gruyter, München/Berlin-New York 1988; M. Heidegger, Nietzsche, Neske, Pfullingen 1961; M. Cacciari, Krisis, Feltrinelli, Milano 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Baudrillard, Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe, Gallimard, Paris 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Baudrillard, Pour une critique…, op. cit.; E. Giannetto, Physis, Bios, Psyché e Logos: note verso una fisica come dissoluzione delle pratiche simboliche, in Metaxù, n. 8 (1989), pp. 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Heidegger (1938), Die Zeit des Weltbildes, in Holtzwege,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See also: M. Heidegger, Platon Lehre von der Wahrheit, in Wegmarken,op. cit., pp. 201–236; M. Heidegger, Vom Wesen der Wahrheit. Zu Platons Höhlengleichnis und Theätet, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Husserl, Die Krisis…,op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Der Zeitbegriff in der…, op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Die Frage nach der Technik, op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Wissenschaft und…, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Marcuse, On Science and…,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See also, for instance: C. A. Truesdell, Essays in the History of Mechanics, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See for example: M. Heidegger, Die Frage nach der Technik, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Giannetto, Physis…, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Helmholtz, Über die Erhaltung der Kraft, Reimer, Berlin 1847 & in Klassiker der exacten Wissenschaften, ed. by W. Ostwald, Engelmann, Leipzig 1889, n. 1; G. W. Leibniz, Leibnizens mathematische Schriften, ed. by C. G. Gerhardt, Halle 1850–63; E. Cassirer, Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen, Elwert, Marburg 1902 & Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1962. See also: M. Jammer, Concepts of Force. A study in the foundations of dynamics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1957; M. B. Hesse, Forces and Fields. The Concept of Action at a Distance in the History of Physics, Nelson & Sons, Edinburgh 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Heidegger, Aristoteles…,op. cit.; Aristotle, Physica; De caelo, ed. by W. D. Ross, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Indeed, Nietzsche’s idea of will to power (Wille zur Macht) is explicitly related to the idea of a physical variable generating forces like potential energy: F. Nietzsche, Sämtliche Werke, op. cit.; G. Deleuze, Nietzsche et la philosophie, P.U.F., Paris 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, ed. by H. Diels (1903) and by W. von Kranz, Berlin 196612; La Sapienza greca II, ed. by G. Colli, Adelphi, Milano 1978; see also: E. Giannetto, The Epistemological and Physical Importance of Gödel’s Theorems, in First International Symposyum on Gödel’s Theorems,ed. by Z. W. Wolkowski, World Scientific, Singapore 1993, pp. 136–147; G. Calogero, Storia della logica antica,Laterza, Roma-Bari 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See also: J. Baudrillard, Pour une critique…,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. Smith & M. N. Wise, Energy and Empire,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See also: E. Cassirer, Leibniz’ System…,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See also: R. Thom, Esquisse d’une sémiophysique,Intereditions, Paris 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Heidegger, Die Frage nach der Technik, op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Wissenschaft und Besinnung,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Husserl, Die Krisis…, op. cit.; H. Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man…, op. cit.; H. Marcuse, On Science…,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Giannetto, La logica quantistica tra fondamenti della matematica e della fisica, in Foundations of Mathematics & Physics, ed. by U. Bartocci & J. P. Wesley, Wesley, Blumberg 1990, pp. 107–127; E. Giannetto, L’epistemologia quantistica come metafora antifondazionistica, in Immagini Linguaggi Concetti, ed. by S. Petruccioli, Theoria, Roma 1991, pp. 301–322; E. Giannetto, On Truth: A Physical Inquiry, in Atti del Congresso ‘Nuovi problemi della logica e della filosofia della scienza’, I, ed. by C. Cellucci & M. Dalla Chiara, CLUEB, Bologna 1991, pp. 221–228; E. Giannetto, The Epistemological…, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Kline, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See notes 31 & 32 and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. L. Bell, From Absolute to Local Mathematics, in Synthese,v. 69 (1986), pp. 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. C. van Fraassen Formal semantics and logic Macmillan Co., New York 1971. For the physical importance of free logics, see: K. Lambert Logical Truth and Microphysics in The Logical Way of Doing Things ed. by K. Lambert, Yale University Press, New Haven 1967, pp. 93–117; E. Giannetto La logica quantistica… op. cit.; E. Giannetto, Il crollo del concetto di spazio-tempo negli sviluppi della fisica quantistica: l’impossibilità di una ricostruzione razionale nomologica del mondo in Aspetti epistemologici dello spazio e del tempo ed. by G. Boniolo Borla, Roma 1987, pp. 169–224.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See note 35.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See for instance: G. Helm, Die Energetik nach ihrer geschictlichen Entwiclung, Leipzig 1898; W. Ostwald, Die Überwindung des wissenschaftlichen Materialismus, Leipzig 1895; C. G. Jung, Über die Energetik der Seele, Psychologische Abhandlungen II, Rascher, Zürich 1928; W. Pauli & C. G. Jung, Naturerklärung und Psyche, Zürich 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See also: S. Brush, Statistical Physics and the Atomic Theory of Matter from Boyle and Newton to Landau and Onsager Princeton University Press, Princeton 1983; E. Morin, La Méthode. I. La Nature de la Nature Seuil, Paris 1977; M. Serres Hermes I-V Minuit Paris 1969–1980; M. Serres La naissance de la physique dans le texte de Lucrèce. Fleuves et turbulences Minuit, Paris 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See also: G. Deleuze, Nietzsche et…,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Piaget & R. Garcia, Les explications causales P.U.F., Paris 1971; E. Giannetto Note sull’interpretazione della relatività generale di A. S. Eddington in Atti del XII Congresso Nazionale di Storia della Fisica (LXXVII S.I.F., L’Aquila 1991), ed. by F. Bevilacqua, Goliardica Pavese, Pavia 1993 (in press); E. Mach Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung historisch-kritisch dargestellt Brockhaus, Leipzig 1883; H. Hertz Die Prinzipien der Mechanik in neuem Zusammenhang dargstellt Brockhaus, Leipzig 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See E. Giannetto, Physis…, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See, for example, some of the most important papers written by Poincaré in which he gave the conceptual foundations and then the complete formulation of special relativity: H. Poincaré,La Science et l’Hypothèse Flammarion, Paris 1902; H. Poincaré L’état actuel et l’avenir de la Physique mathématique in Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques v. 28 (1904), pp. 302–324; H. Poincaré, Sur la dynamique de l’électron in Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences v. 140 (1905), pp. 1504–1508; H. Poincaré, Sur la dynamique de l’électron in Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo,v. 21 (1906), pp. 129–175. Poincaré was the ignored author of the four-dimensional space-time formulation of special relativity; see also: E. Giannetto, Poincaré and the rise of relativity, conference delivered at LXXIX S.I.F., Udine, October 1993 (in press) and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Brush, Statistical Physics…, op. cit.; E. Giannetto, Note sulla complessità: Max Born e la nascita della nuova fisica del caos, conference delivered at the International Congress S.I.LF.S., Lucca, January 1993 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  44. See also: M. Deakin, Nineteenth Century Anticipation of Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, in Archives for History of Exact Sciences, v. 39 (1988/89), pp. 183–194; I. Hacking, Nineteenth Century Cracks in the Concept of Determinism, in Journal of the History of Ideas (1983), pp. 455–475.

    Google Scholar 

  45. See also: E. Giannetto, Note sulla complessità.., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See note 42 and M. Jammer, Concepts of Space. The History of Theories of Space in Physics, Harvard University Press, Harvard, Massachusetts 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  47. For his criticism, see note 6. An idea of temporalization of space was already present in Leibniz: see H. Poser, La teoria leibniziana della relatività di spazio e tempo, aut-aut, v. 254–255 (1993), pp. 33–48. It was also present in M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, op. cit., § 70. It is not known whether he knew Whitehead’s formulation of special relativity — where, at variance with all the other formulations, temporalization of space is a fundamental feature — but he certainly was aware of relativity (see the texts quoted in note 6) and of Bergson’s critical analysis, in particular, on the seeming spatialization of time: H. Bergson, durée et simultanéité, P.U.F., Paris 1922, 1968. Indeed, Whitehead was also influenced by Bergson’s philosophy of temporal evolution and becoming: H. Bergson, Oeuvres, P.U.F., Paris 1959–1972; A. N. Whitehead, An Enquiry on the Principles of Natural Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1919; A. N. Whitehead, The Concept of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1920; A. N. Whitehead, The Principle of Relativity with applications to Physical Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1922. However, in M. Heidegger, Zeit und Sein, op. cit., he rejected the idea of a fundamental temporalization of space as given in the § 70 of Sein und Zeit, stressing the priority of events beyond space-time. This temporalization, Heideggerian idea has been recently reconsidered by J. Derrida, without quoting Whitehead: J. Derrida, De la grammatologie, op. cit., chh. II & III.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Heidegger, Zeit und Sein, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  49. For such an idea of pre-geometry, see: J. A. Wheeler, Pregeometry: motivations and prospects, in Quantum Theory and Gravitation, ed. by A. R. Marlow, Academic Press, New York 1980; E. Giannetto, Il crollo…,and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  50. For such an indeterministic interpretation of relativity, see: E. Giannetto, Note sulla complessità: Max Born…, op. cit. and references therein. Very briefly, one can say that the relativistic invariants like the scalar products of quadrivectors by themselves express the mixed indeterminacies of space and time, energy and impulse, and so on.

    Google Scholar 

  51. E. Giannetto, Notes on Non-Separability, conference delivered at the Congress on `Quantum Mechanics’, Lecce, October 1993 (in press). Here, I use the word Dasein without any Heidegerian, anthropocentric, specist connotation.

    Google Scholar 

  52. M. Heidegger, Die Frage nach der Technik, op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Wissenschaft und Besinnung,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  53. E. Giannetto, Il crollo…,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  54. E. Giannetto, Il crollo…,op. cit. and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  55. E. Giannetto, Il crollo…,op. cit.; E. Giannetto, Teoria quanto-relativistica delle fasi macroscopiche della materia condensata: la transizione fluido-solido,ph. d. thesis, University of Messina, Messina 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  56. E. Giannetto, Notes on Non-Separability, op. cit.; A. Einstein, B. Podolski & N. Rosen, Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be considered complete?, in Physical Review, v. 47 (1935), pp. 777–780.

    Google Scholar 

  57. D. Finkelstein, Matter Space and Logic, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science,v. 5 (1969), p. 199; E. Giannetto, Il crollo…,op. cit.;; E. Giannetto, Toward a Physical Superlogodynamics,conference delivered at the Logic Colloquium `88, Padova, July 1988 (in press; an abstract was published in Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 55 (1990), pp. 404–405).

    Google Scholar 

  58. E. Giannetto, Note sulla complessità…, op. cit.; M. Heidegger, Die Zeit des Weltbildes, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  59. E. Giannetto, Note sulla complessità…, op. cit. and references therein; see also: I. Prigogine, Le leggi del caos, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  60. E. Giannetto, Note sulla complessità…, op. cit.; M. Born & D. J. Hooton, Statistical Dynamics of Multiply-Periodic Systems, in Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, v. 52 (1956), pp. 287–300; see also: K. R. Popper, The Open Universe. An argument for Indeterminism, in Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery,ed. by W. W. Bartley III, Rowman & Littlefield, Totawa, & Hutchinson, London 1982–83.

    Google Scholar 

  61. M. Heidegger Die Zeit des Weltbildes op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  62. M. Heidegger(1965) Zur Frage nach der Bestimmung der Sache des Denkens op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  63. See note 62 and P. Virilio, L’inertie polaire,Bourgois, Paris 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  64. E. Giannetto, Toward a Natural Physics, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  65. E. Giannetto, Physis… op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giannetto, E. (1999). Heidegger and the Question of Physics. In: Fehér, M., Kiss, O., Ropolyi, L. (eds) Hermeneutics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 206. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9293-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9293-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5257-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9293-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics