Skip to main content

Nature of Physics — Teachers’ Views

  • Chapter
Research in Science Education in Europe

Abstract

The nature of science has been under intensive study during the past decades. It is not only important to obtain detailed information about the special fields of science, e.g. physics, but also about the effects of teacher’s views on students’ conceptions of physical knowledge. This preliminary study focuses on Finnish teachers and explores their views of physics as a discipline and of physical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practising secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75 (1), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Peréz, D. (1996). New trends in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 18 (8), 889–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulaidis, V. & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers’ philosophical assumptions: how well do we understand them? International Journal of Science Education, 17 (3), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: the role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nott, M. & Wellington, J. (1996). Probing teachers’ views of the nature of science: How should we do it and where should we be looking? In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds), Research in science education in Europe: current issues and themes (pp. 283-293). USA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond the constructivism. Science Education 80 (1), 53–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viiri, J., Hirvonen, P. E., Saari, H., Sormunen, K., Tuomi, T. & Nisimov, S. U. (1997). Is an iron atom made of iron? Poster presented at the First International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, 2-6- September 1997, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sormunen, K. (1999). Nature of Physics — Teachers’ Views. In: Bandiera, M., Caravita, S., Torracca, E., Vicentini, M. (eds) Research in Science Education in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9307-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9307-6_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5218-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9307-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics