Skip to main content

The Mobilization of Bias Revisited: Institutional Design, Cultural Bias and Policy-Oriented Learning

  • Chapter
Governance in Modern Society

Part of the book series: Library of Public Policy and Public Administration ((LPPP,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter explicates and illustrates the way in which institutional design influences the activation of cultural biases in the policy process, which in turn influences the process of policy-oriented learning. The institutional domain under consideration includes constitutional structures and formal administrative organizations as well as informal links, rules and procedures that structure policy making (cf. Hall, 1986). The various effects of administrative institutions are discussed in two clusters relating to: (1) the formative or identity-shaping effects of administrative institutions, and (2) the relational or interaction-arranging effects of administrative institutions. In accordance with this, administrative institutions are defined as all the relatively persistent patterns of behavior and organization within the administrative system that have a formative or relational impact on the communities and actors involved in the development of public policy.

“Organization is the mobilization of bias. Some issues are organized into politics while others are organized out”

(Schattschneider, 1961: 71).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avineri, S. and A. de-Shalit (eds.) (1992) Communitarianism and Individualism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach P. and M.S. Baratz (1970) Power and Poverty, Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L. and T. Luckmann (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulpitt, J. (1983) Territory and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1983) The City and the Grass-Roots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D., J.G. March and J.P. Olsen (1972) A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Review 17: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenson, M.A. (1971) The Un-Politics of Air Pollution, A Study of Non-Decesionmaking in the Cities. Boulder: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. and J. Thoenig (1976) The Regulation of Complex Organised Systems. Administrative Science Review 21: 547–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, D.J. & R.J. Ellis (eds.) (1994) Politics, Policy and Culture. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell (1991) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and

    Google Scholar 

  • Collective Rationality. In: W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1972) Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle. The Public Interest 3: 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grendstad, G. and P. Selle (1995) Cultural Theory and the New Institutionalism. Journal of Theoretical Politics 7 (1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and R.C.R. Taylor (1996) Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies: 936–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, F. (1999) Public Policy and Political Institutions: The Role of Culture in Traffic Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1983) The Tools of Government. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, J. (1996) Review Article: Institutions and Rationality in Politics: Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalists. British Journal of Political Science 26: 553–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Newcomer and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder S.H. and B.G. Peters (1990) An Institutional Approach to the Theory of Policy-Making: The Role of Guidance Mechanisms in Policy Formulation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (1): 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V. (1996) Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal. Public Administration 74: 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1989) Rediscovering Institutions, The Organisational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1996) Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 9 (3): 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J.W. and B. Rowan (1991) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. In: W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page and M.J. Goldsmith (1987) Central and Local Government Relations, A Comparative Analysis of West European Unitary States. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. and P.J. DiMaggio (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.J. (1982) Introduction. In: J.J. Richardson (ed.) Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1980) Analysing Intergovernmental Relations. European Journal of Political Research 8: 289–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. (1988) An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P.A. (1993) Policy Change over a Decade or More. In: P.A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (eds.) Policy Change and Learning, A Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanf, K. and F.W. Scharpf (1978) Intergovernmental Policy Making. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. (1961) The Semisovereign People, A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1987) The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Review 32: 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1996) Institutionalism: Old and New. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. and S. Steinmo (1992) Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. In: S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds.) Stucturing Politics, Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., R. Ellis and A. Wildaysky (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A. (1987) Choosing Preferences by Constructing Insitutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation. American Political Science Review 81 (1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A. (1994) Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context, Cultural Contributions to a Theory of Rational Choices. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (2): 131–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendriks, F. (2000). The Mobilization of Bias Revisited: Institutional Design, Cultural Bias and Policy-Oriented Learning. In: van Heffen, O., Kickert, W.J.M., Thomassen, J.J.A. (eds) Governance in Modern Society. Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9486-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9486-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5594-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9486-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics