Abstract
The community of practice phenomenon has been extensively studied in qualitative terms, but there has been relatively little research using quantitative techniques. This study uses the common social network measures of connectedness, density, graph theoretic distance, and core / periphery fit to examine how groups defined by different characteristics align with community of practice theory. Specifically, it investigates the roles of job title, location, and management intention relative to the structural characteristics of communities of practice. Workers were assigned to groups based upon their job title, job group, division, location, and emergent behavior (results of hierarchical clustering). Initial results suggest that grouping employees by their emergent behavior yields network measures that are most closely related to community of practice theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allatta, J.T. (working). “Employee Use and Comparison of Email, Telephone, Intranet, and Proximity Networks”
Allen, Thomas J., (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Allen, Thomas J., (1986). “Organizational Structure, Information Technology, and RandD Productivity,” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, Vol. EM-33, No. 4, p 212–217.
American Productivity and Quality Center, (2001). “Building and Sustaining Communities of Practice: Continuing Success in Knowledge Management,” APQC International Benchmarking Clearinghouse.
Borgatti, S.P. (2002). NetDraw Network Visualization Software.
Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. (1999). “Models of core/periphery structures.” Social Networks, 21: pgs 375–395.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Brown, John Seely and Paul Duguid, (1991). “Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation.” Organization Science 2, no. 1, pgs 40–57.
Brown, John Seely and Paul Duguid, (2000). The Social Life of Information, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Massachusetts.
Brown, John Seely and Paul Duguid, (2001). “Knowledge and Organization: A Social Practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12, no. 2, pgs 198–213.
Cohen, Don and Larry Prusak, (2001). In Good Company,Harvard Business School Press, Boston Massachusetts
Daft, Richard L. and Robert H. Lengel (1984). “Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, p 191–233.
Davenport, Thomas H. and Laurence Prusak, (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Massachusetts
Kogut, Bruce and Udo Zander (1992). “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology,” Organization Science, vol. 3 no. 3, p. 383–397.
Koku, Emmanuel, Nancy Nazer, and Barry Wellman (2000). “Netting Scholars: Online and Offline,” American Behavioral Scientist, volume 43, Special Issue: “Mapping Globalization”.
Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger, (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nohria, Nitin and Sumantra Ghoshal (1997). The Differentiated Network: Organising Mutinational Corporations for Value Creation, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Orr, Julian (1996). Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press.
Schenkel, A., Teigland, R., and Borgatti, S. P. 2001. Theorizing Structural Dimensions of Communities of Practice: A Social Network Approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, D.C.
Teece, Rumelt, Dosi, and Winter (1994). “Understanding Corporate Coherence: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23 (1), p 1–30.
Van den Bulte and Moenaert (1998). “The Effects of RandD Team Co-location Communication Patterns among RandD, Marketing, and Manufacturing,” Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 11, p Sl-S18.
Wenger, Etienne (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, Massachusetts.
Winter, Sidney (1987). “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets,” in David Teece, ed., The Competitive Challenge — Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Allatta, J.T. (2003). Structural Analysis of Communities of Practice: An Investigation of Job title, Location, and Management Intention. In: Huysman, M., Wenger, E., Wulf, V. (eds) Communities and Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6418-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0115-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive