Skip to main content

The Prehistory of Infinitary Logic: 1885–1955

  • Chapter
Structures and Norms in Science

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 260))

Abstract

Traditionally, logic was restricted to proofs having a finite number of steps and to expressions of finite length. Around 1954–56, infinitely long formulas entered the mainstream of mathematical logic through the work of Henkin, Karp, Scott, and Tarski. Soon Hanf and Tarski used such logics to settle negatively the 30-year-old problem of whether the first strongly inaccessible cardinal is measurable, a result Tarski communicated to the first LMPS congress in 1960. Infinitary logic continues to be fertile in unexpected ways, as shown by Kolaitis at the present congress.

History is difficult... because the connections that matter are usually numerous, often hidden, and then subsequently neglected.

S. Mac Lane [33, 441]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Barwise, “Infinitary Logics”, Modern Logic—A Survey, ed. E. Agazzi (Dordrecht, 1980 ), 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.W. Beth, Review of [16], J. Sym. Logic 4 (1939), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.A. Bochvar, “über einen Aussagenkalkül...”, Mat. Sbornik n.s. 7 (1940), 65–100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Boole, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic (London, 1847 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Boole, An Investigation of the Laws of Thought (London, 1854 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Carnap, Abriss der Logistik (Vienna, 1929 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Carnap, “Ein Gültigkeitskriterium…”, Monatshefte fir Math. 41 (1935), 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Carnap, Formalization of Logic (Harvard Univ., 1943 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.C. Chang, Bull. AMS 61 (1955), 325 (abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Church, Review of [36], J. Sym. Logic 5 (1940), 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Church, Review of [3], J. Sym. Logic 5 (1940), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Church, Review of [37], J. Sym. Logic 11 (1946), 129–131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Church, Introduction to Mathematical Logic (Princeton Univ., 1956 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.B. Curry, Review of [3], Math. Reviews 1 (1940), 321.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Gödel “Russell’s Mathematical Logic”, The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, ed. P. A. Schilpp ( New York: Tudor, 1944 ), 123–153.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Helmer, “Languages with Expressions of Infinite Length”, Erkenntnis 7 (1938), 138–141.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Henkin,“The Completeness…”, J. Sym. Logic 14 (1949), 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Henkin, “The Representation Theorem for Cylindrical Algebras”, Mathematical Interpretation of Formal Systems (North-Holland, 1955), 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Henkin, “Some Remarks on Infinitely Long Formulas”, Infinitistic Methods (Pergamon, 1961 ), 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Henkin, E-mail of 10 August 1994 and 26 September 1994 to G.H. Moore.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Herre et al., “The Härtig Quantifier…”, J. Sym. Logic 56 (1991), 1153–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Hilbert, “über die Grundlagen… ”, Internat. Congress Math. (1905), 174–185.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Hilbert, Logische Principien des mathematischen Denkens, lecture course, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Hilbert, “Die logischen Grundlagen…”, Math. Ann. 88 (1923), 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Jordan, “Zur Axiomatik der Verknüpfungsbereiche”, Abhand. Math. Sem. Hamburg. Univ. 16 (1949), 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Karp, Languages with Expressions of Infinite Length (North-Holland, 1964 ).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Krasner, “Une généralisation de la notion de corps”, J. Math. Pures et Appliquées (9) 17 (1938), 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Kuratowski, “Les types d’ordre définissables…”, Fund. Math. 29 (1937), 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.I. Lewis, A Survey of Symbolic Logic (Berkeley: Univ. Calif., 1918 ).

    Google Scholar 

  30. L.H. Loomis, “On the Representation of a-Complete Boolean Algebras”, Bull. AMS 53 (1947), 757–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. L. Löwenheim, Review of [44], Archiv der Math. und Physik (3) 17 (1911), 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. Löwenheim, “Über Möglichkeiten… ”, Math. Ann. 76 (1915), 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Mac Lane, “Addendum…”, A Century of Mathematics in America, Part III, ed. P. Duren ( Amer. Math. Soc., 1989 ), 439–441.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A.I. Maltsev, “Untersuchungen aus dem Gebiete der mathematischen Logik”, Mat. Sbornik n.s. 1 (1936), 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  35. G.H. Moore, “Beyond First-Order Logic:… Axiomatic Set Theory”, History and Phil. Logic 1 (1980), 95–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. P.S. Novikov, “Sur quelques théorèmes d’existence”, C.R. Acad. Sciences URSS (Doklady) n.s. 23 (1939), 438–440.

    Google Scholar 

  37. P.S. Novikov, “On the Consistency…”, Mat. Sbornik n.s. 54 (1943), 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C.S. Peirce, “On the Algebra of Logic…”, Amer. J. Math. 7 (1885), 180–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. F.P. Ramsey, “The Foundations of Mathematics”, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 25 (1926), 338–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Robinson, On the Metamathematics of Algebra (North-Holland, 1951 ).

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Robinson, “Applications to Field Theory”, Summaries… Summer Institute of Symbolic Logic in 1957 at Cornell University (1957), 326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J.B. Rosser, “Gödel Theorems for Non-Constructive Logics”, J. Sym. Logic 2 (1937), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. E. Schröder, Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik, Vol. 3 (Leipzig, 1895 ).

    Google Scholar 

  44. E. Schröder, Abriss der Algebra der Logik, part 2, ed. E. Müller (Leipzig, 1910 ).

    Google Scholar 

  45. D.S. Scott, Bull. AMS 61 (1955), 522–523 (abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. D.S. Scott and A. Tarski, “The Sentential Calculus…”, Summaries… Summer Institute of Symbolic Logic in 1957 at Cornell University (1957), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  47. D.S. Scott and A. Tarski, “The Sentential Calculus with Infinitely Long Expressions”, Colloq. Math. 6 (1958), 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  48. T. Skolem, “Logisch-kombinatorische Untersuchungen… ”, Videnskapsselskapets skrifter, I. Matematisk-naturvidenskabelig klasse, no. 4 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  49. T. Skolem, “Einige Bemerkungen zur axiomatischen Begründung der Mengenlehre”, Ibid., no. 6 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Stone, “The Theory of Representations…”, Trans. AMS 40 (1936), 37–111.

    Google Scholar 

  51. A. Tarski, Translation of 1933 “On the Concept of Truth in Languages of Deductive Sciences” in [56], 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. Tarski, Translation of 1936 “On the Concept of Logical Consequence” in [56], 409420.

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Tarski, Bull. AMS 61 (1955), 523–524 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. Tarski, “Remarks on Predicate Logic with Infinitely Long Expressions”, Summaries of Talks presented at the Summer Institute of Symbolic Logic in 1957 at Cornell University (1957), 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  55. A. Tarski, “Remarks on Predicate Logic with Infinitely Long Expressions”, Colloq. Math. 6 (1958), 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  56. A. Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (Hackett, 1983), ed. J. Corcoran.

    Google Scholar 

  57. J. van Heijenoort, From Frege to Gödel (Harvard Univ., 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  58. R.L. Vaught, “Model Theory before 1945”, Proc. Tarski Symposium, ed. L. Henkin ( Amer. Math. Soc., 1974 ), 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  59. L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London, 1922 ).

    Google Scholar 

  60. E. Zermelo, “über mathematische Systeme und die Logik des Unendlichen”, Forschungen und Fortschritte 8 (1932), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  61. E. Zermelo, “Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Theorie der mathematischen Satzsysteme”, Fund. Math 25 (1935), 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moore, G.H. (1997). The Prehistory of Infinitary Logic: 1885–1955. In: Chiara, M.L.D., Doets, K., Mundici, D., Van Benthem, J. (eds) Structures and Norms in Science. Synthese Library, vol 260. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4787-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0538-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics