Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Logic Series ((APLS,volume 2))

Abstract

A Gentzen calculus has the ‘display property’ if every antecedent [consequent] constituent can be displayed as the antecedent [consequent] standing alone. It is explained why this property is interesting. The ‘display problem’ is the problem of designing a calculus with the display property. A perspective is suggested from which the solution of Wansing [19] can easily be seen to be incomparable with that of [4]. The perspective suggests some other solutions, which are briefly surveyed. Additional questions are raised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Allwein, C. Hartonas. Duality for bounded lattices. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Logic Group Preprint Series, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap. Entailment: the logic of relevance and necessity. Vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap, J. M. Dunn. Entailment: the logic of relevance and necessity. Vol. II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Belnap. Display logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic,11 375–417, 1982. Republished with minor changes as §62 of [3].

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Belnap. Linear logic displayed. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31, 14–25, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. B. Curry. A theory of formal deducibility. Notre Dame mathematical lectures, vol. no. 6, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Dunn. Gaggle theory: an abstraction of Galois connections and residuation with applications to negation and various logical operations. In: J. van Eijck (ed.), Logics in Al: Proceedings European Workshop JELJA 1990, pp. 31–51, Lecture Notes in Computer Sci. 478, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Dunn. Partial-gaggles applied to sub-structural logics. In: P. Schroeder-Heister, K. Dosen (eds.), Substructural logics, pp. 63–108, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. M. Dunn. A representation of relation algebras using Routley-Meyer frames. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Logic Group Preprint Series, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Dunn. Perp and Star: two treatments of negation. In: J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 7, Language and Logic, pp. 331–157, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. by M. E. Szabo in: The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, M. E. Szabo (ed.), pp. 69–131, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Goré. Displayed intuitionistic modal logics. Technical report in preparation, Australian National University, April, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Goré. Displaying sub-intuitionistic logics. Technical report in preparation, Australian National University, April 1994b.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Goré. Intuitionistic logic redisplayed. Technical report, TR-ARP-1–1995, Australian National University, January 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Hartonas. Lattices with operators: a unified semantics for substructural logics. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Logic Group Preprint Series, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Hartonas, J. M. Dunn. Duality theorems for partial orders, semilattices, and Galois connections and lattices. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Logic Group Preprint Series, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Kracht. Power and weakness of the modal display calculus. Technical report, Free University of Berlin, Mathematics Institute II, August, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. K. Meyer. A general Gentzen system for implicational calculi. Relevance Logic Newsletter, 1, 198–201, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Wansing. Sequent calculi for normal modal propositional logics. Technical report, n. LP-92–12, University of Amsterdam, 1992, Journal of Logic and Computation, 4, 124–142, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belnap, N. (1996). The Display Problem. In: Wansing, H. (eds) Proof Theory of Modal Logic. Applied Logic Series, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2798-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2798-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4720-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2798-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics