Abstract
To know how to justify court judgements requires both skill in inference and clear formulation of thought—i.e. those skills that tend to be developed by studying logic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
We have in mind here direct and indirect justification in the signification used in Chapter XII § 1, and not in the sense in which direct and indirect proofs are used in the legal sciences.
Loosely, it is often said about ‘deductive conclusion’ having in mind ‘a sensible, reasonable conclusion’. Of course, a conclusion which is not entailed logically from the premises may in some circumstances be sensible and reasonable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziembiński, Z. (1976). Logical Foundations of Justifying Court Judgements. In: Practical Logic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5604-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5604-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5589-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-5604-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive