Abstract
Immobile suspension feeders living on soft substrates, although rare in modern marine habitats, were relatively common in the Paleozoic. Numerous Paleozoic taxa have been interpreted as dwelling on soft unconsolidated sediments and possessing morphologic features that either prevented them from sinking (e.g., strophomenid brachiopods) or anchored them to the sea floor (e.g., crinoid holdfasts). The quantitative expression of the static stresses for forms living on soft, muddy bottoms developed by Thayer (1975) can be easily modified to describe the forces involved in anchoring. One of the more unusual putative anchoring structures is the “grapnel” holdfast of the Devonian crinoid Ancyrocrinus. This form does not match the paradigm for most typical current anchoring structures, lacking recurved, pointed, and flattened lateral processes. Its form is suggestive, however, of the modern, nautical mushroom anchors deployed on muddy bottoms. Plaster casts of the Ancyrocrinus holdfast were used to quantify the actual forces involved in penetrating, being pulled out of, or dragged across soft substrates. The forces were measured using a digital force gauge mounted on a motorized test stand. Substrates used included fine quartz sand, pure kaolin mud, and coarse carbonate sand. The holdfasts readily penetrated soft mud, but encountered much greater resistance in fine sand. They did, however, readily penetrate the latter substrate when rocked, supporting the comparison with mushroom anchors. Holdfasts do not penetrate the sediment when dragged across it, suggesting a minimal ability to passively anchor in this way. Simple calculations of the sinking velocity of Ancyrocrinus suggest that when dislodged, they would have easily reimplanted in soft substrates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson K, Close L, DeWreede RE, Lynch BJ, Ormond C, Walker M (2006) Biomechanical properties and holdfast morphology of coenocytic algae (Halimedales, Chlorophyta) in Bocas del Toro, Panama. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 328(2):155–167
Ausich WI, Brett CE, Hess H, Simms MJ (1999) Crinoid form and function. In: Hess H, Ausich WI, Brett CE, Simms MJ (eds) Fossil crinoids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–30
Bather FA (1900) The Crinoidea. In: Lankester RE (ed) Treatise on zoology, part III. Adam and Charles Black, London, pp 94–204
Baumiller TK (1992) Importance of hydrodynamic lift to crinoid autecology, or, could crinoids function as kites? J Paleontol 66(4):658–665
Baumiller TK, Ausich WI (1996) Crinoid stalk flexibility: theoretical predictions and fossil stalk postures. Lethaia 29(1):47–59
Bokuniewicz HJ, Gordon RB, Rhoads DC (1974) Mechanical properties of the sediment-water interface. Mar Geol 18:263–278
Breimer A (1969) A contribution to the paleoecology of Palaeozoic stalked crinoids. Proc Koninklijke Ned Akad Wet Ser B: Phys Sci 72(2):139–150
Brett CE (1981) Terminology and functional-morphology of attachment structures in pelmatozoan echinoderms. Lethaia 14(4):343–370
Brower JC (2006) Ontogeny of the food-gathering system in Ordovician crinoids. J Paleontol 80(3):430–446
Denny MW, Daniel RL, Koehl MAR (1985) Mechanical limits to size in wave-swept organisms. Ecol Monogr 55:69–102
Donovan SK (2006) Crinoid anchoring strategies for soft-bottom dwelling (comment on Seilacher and MacClintock, 2005). Palaios 21(4):397–399
Donovan SK (2011) The poorly illustrated crinoid. Lethaia 44(2):125–135.
Donovan SK, Harper DAT, Hakansson E (2007) The root of the problem: palaeoecology of distinctive crinoid attachment structures from the Silurian (Wenlock) of Gotland. Lethaia 40(4):313–320
Dornbos SQ (2006) Evolutionary palaeoecology of early epifaunal echinoderms: response to increasing bioturbation levels during the Cambrian radiation. Palaeogeog Palaeoclim Palaeoecol 237(2–4):225–239
Ehrenberg K (1929) Pelmatozoan root-forms (fixation). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 59(1):1–76
Ennos AR (1993) The scaling of root anchorage. J Theor Biol 161(1):61–75
Goldstein A, Greb SF, Conkin JE (2009) Stratigraphy of the Silurian and Devonian Strata in the central Ohio Valley, the Falls of the Ohio, and quarries in Clark Co., Indiana. Field Guide, 9th North American Paleontological Convention, Cincinnati, Ohio, June 24, 2009
Goldring W (1923) The Devonian crinoids of the state of New York. N Y State Mus Mem 16:1–670
Goldring W (1942) Crown of Ancyrocrinus bulbosus Hall. Bull Buffalo Soc Nat Sci 17(3):13–18
Hall J (1862) Preliminary notice of some of the species of Crinoidea known in the Upper Helderberg and Hamilton groups of New York. N Y State Cabinet Nat Hist 15th Ann Rep 15:115–153
Hinz ER (1986) The complete book of anchoring and mooring. Cornell Maritime Press, Centreville
Jumars PA, Dorgan KM, Mayer LM, Boudreau BP, Johnson BD (2007) Material constraints on infaunal lifestyles: may the persistent and strong forces be with you. In: Miller III W (ed) Trace fossils: concepts, problems and prospects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 442–457
Kastendiek J (1976) Behavior of sea pansy Renilla kollikeri Pfeffer (Coelenterata-Pennatulacea) and its influence on distribution and biological interactions of species. Biol Bull 151(3):518–537
Kirk E (1911) The structure and relationships of certain eleutherozoic Pelmatozoa. Proc U S Natl Mus 41:1–137
Leighton LR (2000) Environmental distribution of spinose brachiopods from the Devonian of New York: test of the soft-substrate hypothesis. Palaios 15(3):184–193
Le Menn J, Jaouen PA (2003) Nouvelles espèces d’Ancyrocrinus et d’Ammonicrinus, crinoïdes à pédoncule spécialisé du Dévonien armoricain (Brest, France). C R Palevol 2(3):205–212
Lowenstam HA (1942) The development of the crinoid root Ancyrocrinus. Bull Buffalo Soc Nat Sci 17(3):21–36
McIntosh GC, Schreiber RL (1971) Morphology and taxonomy of the Middle Devonian crinoid Ancyrocrinus bulbosus Hall 1862. Cont Mus Paleont 23(25):381–403
Mickovski SB, Ennos AR (2003) Model and whole-plant studies on the anchorage capabilities of bulbs. Plant and Soil 255(2):641–652
Mickovski SB, Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Davies MCR, Hallett PD, Sonnenberg R (2007) Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. Eur J Soil Sci 58(6):1471–1481
Parsley RL, Prokop RJ (2004) Functional morphology and paleoecology of some sessile Middle Cambrian echinoderms from the Barrandian region of Bohemia. Bull Geosci 79:147–156
Plotnick RE, Baumiller TK (1988) The pterygotid telson as a biological rudder. Lethaia 21(1):13–27
Plotnick RE, Baumiller TK (2000) Invention by evolution: functional analysis in paleobiology. Paleobiol 26(4):305–323
Rudwick MJS (1964) The inference of function from structure in fossils. Br J Philos Sci 15:27–40
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth 9(7):671–675
Seilacher A (1999) Biomat-related lifestyles in the Precambrian. Palaios 14(1):86–93
Seilacher A, MacClintock C (2005) Crinoid anchoring strategies for soft-bottom dwelling. Palaios 20(3):224–240
Sowers GB, Sowers GF (1970) Introductory soil mechanics and foundations 3rd edn. Collier Macmillan Ltd, Hong Kong
Stokes A, Ball J, Fitter AH, Brain P, Coutts MP (1996) An experimental investigation of the resistance of model root systems to uprooting. Ann Bot 78(4):415–421
Taylor GI (2004) The holding power of anchors. Resonance 9(10):88–93
Thayer CW (1975) Morphologic adaptations of benthic invertebrates to soft substrata. J Mar Res 33(2):177–189
Ubaghs G (1953) Classe de Crinoides. In: Piveteau J (ed) Traite de paleontologie, vol III. Masson, Paris, pp 658–773
Vogel S (1994) Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Vogel S (2003) Comparative biomechanics: life’s physical world. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Weaver JS, Chamberlain JA Jr (1976) Equations of motion for post mortem sinking of cephalopod shells and the sinking of Nautilus. Paleobiol 2(1):8–18
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the organizers of the session on Lessons from the Living for the opportunity to present this research. Laurel Perper assisted in the lab on the measurements of the drag. Brenda Hunda and the Cincinnati Museum Center are thanked for the loan of specimens. Jessica Cundiff at the MCZ assisted with access to their specimens of Ancyrocrinus. Chris Honeycutt brought the arrow analogy to our attention. Steve Vogel suggested how to measure the lateral forces. The manuscript was improved by reviews from Brian Platt and an anonymous reviewer; they are thanked. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under EAR 0921771. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plotnick, R., Bauer, J. (2014). Crinoids Aweigh: Experimental Biomechanics of Ancyrocrinus Holdfasts. In: Hembree, D., Platt, B., Smith, J. (eds) Experimental Approaches to Understanding Fossil Organisms. Topics in Geobiology, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8721-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8721-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8720-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8721-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)