Skip to main content

Movies and Medical Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and the Arts

Abstract

In classrooms and lecture halls around the world, motion pictures have proven to be excellent platforms from which to ignite enthusiasm, illustrate clinical signs and symptoms of illness, recount medical history and scientific progress, and enhance understanding of research and medical practices. They provide instruments for highlighting contemporary social issues and society’s perception of health care, disease and medical ethics, as well as to initiate thought-experiments that advance philosophical knowledge. By portraying relationship webs that influence moral behaviours, films are able to turn us inwards, as we experience the cinematic narrative using both the emotive and cognitive parts of our being. By virtue of a visual, aural, and imaginative medium, film draws on our sensitivities and intellect; challenging us to interpretations that promote debates of complex moral issues or bioethical claims. In a sense, film might be viewed as a nexus where art, science, philosophy, behavioural sciences, and medicine join to enable and enrich our understanding. This chapter provides examples of how feature films and their specific scenes can be used to promote reflection on a variety of medical ethics issues, and showcases some of the techniques and hazards of using cinematic storytelling for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In parentheses the year of film’s release is followed by the name of the film’s director.

  2. 2.

    Adrenaline (probably epinephrine), is a stress hormone that stimulates heart rate and accelerates respiration. Such an injection is completely contrary to acceptable practices with well established protocols of physician-assisted death by removal from mechanical ventilation where anxiolytics and sedatives are used to avoid suffering from air hunger.

References

  1. Battlin, M.P., L.P. Francis, J.A. Jacobson, and C.B. Smith. 2009. Pandemic planning: What is ethically justified. In The patient as victim and vector: Ethics and infectious disease, 329–358. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne, P. 2000. The stigma of mental illness and ways of diminishing it. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 6: 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, S.B. 2004. Medical monsters in classic horror films. In Cultural sutures: Medicine and media, ed. Lester Friedman, 132–133. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Custen, George. 1992. Bio/pics: How Hollywood constructed public history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isaacs, B. 2006. Film cool: Towards a new film aesthetic. Thesis for degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kael, P. 2011. The age of movies: Selected writings of Pauline Kael, ed. Sanford Swartz. Kindle edition location 15639. Penguin Group, Library of the Americas.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keller, D. 2012. For video: Make it short, make it punchy and get to the point. http://www.storyguide.net/archives/769. Accessed March 2014.

  9. Latham, S.R. 2011. Reproductive cloning: Multiplicity. In The picture of health: Medical ethics and the movies, ed. H.G. Colt, S. Quadrelli, and L. Friedman, 357–361. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lyall, S. 2007. In Stetson or wig, he’s hard to pin down. New York Times, November 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/movies/moviesspecial/04lyal.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&. Accessed March 2014.

  11. Mitry, J. 1990 (Original 1963). Aesthetics and Psychology of the Cinema. Trans. C. King. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Percy, W. 1998. The moviegoer. Location 3475, Kindle edition. Vintage International Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quadrelli, S., H.G. Colt, and G. Semeniuk. 2009. Appreciation of the aesthetic: A new dimension for a medicine and movies program. Family Medicine 41: 316–319.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shapshay, S. 2009. Introduction. In Bioethics at the movies, ed. Sandra Shapshay, 7–12. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steinbock, B., J.D. Arras, and A.J. London. 2003. Ethical issues in modern medicine, 6th ed, 35. London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams, S. 2011. Justice, autonomy, and transhumanism: Yesterday. In The picture of health: Medical ethics and the movies, ed. H.G. Colt, S. Quadrelli, and L. Friedman, 86–89. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Winter, R.O., and B.A. Birnberg. 2009. Million dollar baby: Murder or mercy. Family Medicine 41: 164–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Colt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colt, H. (2014). Movies and Medical Ethics. In: Macneill, P. (eds) Ethics and the Arts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8816-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics