Abstract
This study examines the strategies used in a science club by a science-fair-award-winning teacher instructing talented senior high school students in scientific inquiry. Using the framework developed by Collins et al. (Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In: Resnick L (ed) Knowing, learning, and instruction: essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 453–494, 1989) for designing an ideal learning environment from cognitive apprenticeship perspectives, the study first analyzed the club’s activities, teaching methods, sequencing of learning activities, and sociology within the club. It then investigated the processes used by the teacher to simultaneously and equitably instruct multiple groups of students in scientific inquiry. While using the science club to promote scientific inquiry, the teacher utilized cognitive apprenticeship perspectives in his teaching. In the science club, the teacher gathered many resources, thus helping the continuity of various learning experiences. The teacher employed multi-content lessons to cultivate each club student’s ability in science inquiry. Thus, this study presents an effective analysis of a science-fair-award-winning teacher’s use of a science club to direct students’ science academic progress through science inquiry activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barry, D., & Kanematsu, H. (2006). International program to promote creative thinking in chemistry and science. The Chemist, 83(2), 10–14.
Bellipanni, L. J., & Lilly, J. E. (1999). What have researchers been saying about science fairs? Science and Children, 99, 46–50.
Brown, J. S. (1985a). Process versus product: A perspective on tools for communal and informal electronic learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 179–201.
Brown, J. S. (1985b). Idea-amplifiers: New kinds of electronic learning. Educational Horizons, 63, 108–112.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
CASTIC. (2012). Introduction of China adolescents science and technology innovation contest. Retrieved from http://castic.xiaoxiaotong.org/intro.aspx?ColumnID=1011000000
Collins, A. (1993). Design issues for learning environments. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Psychological and educational foundations of technology-based education. New York: Springer.
Collins, A. (1997). Cognitive apprenticeship and the changing workplace. Proceedings of 5th annual international conference on post-compulsory education and training. Queensland.
Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, D. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Galen, D. (1993). Science fair: A successful venture. The American Biology Teacher, 55(5), 465–467.
Humphreys, B., Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1982). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning on students’ achievement in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(5), 351–356.
Li, X. (2008). Studies on school education environment of high-quality middle school CASTIC’ projects (中学创新大赛项目学校教育环境研究). Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
Malone, T. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.
Mann, J. Z. (1984). Science day guide. Columbus: Ohio academy of science.
Marsa, L. (1993). Do high school science competitions predict success? In C. M. Czerniak (Ed.), Predictors of success in a district science fair competition: An exploratory study (pp. 21–22). Alabama: School Science and Mathematics Association.
Michaels, J. (1977). Classroom reward structures and academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 87–98.
Okebukola, P., & Ogunniyi, M. B. (1984). Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic interaction patterns effects on students; achievement and acquisition of practical skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 875–884.
Olson, L. S. (1985). The North Dakota science and engineering fair-its history and a survey of its participants. Fargo: North Dakota State University.
Ou, Y. (2006). Exploration of cognitive apprenticeship perspectives in case study of a science-fair awarded teacher’s application of science club to instruct students in progress of science inquiry (以认知学徒制观点探讨科展优秀教师应用科学社团指导学生进行科学探究活动的个案研究). Taiwan: Taiwan Normal University.
Tjosvold, D., Marino, P. M., & Johnson, D. W. (1977). The effects of cooperation and competition on student reactions to inquiry and didactic science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 281–288.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Professor Enshan Liu for his patient guidance and valuable suggestions. I also want to give my sincere appreciation to teacher Zhang who is the teacher in this study, for his cooperation and all his assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, X. (2017). A Case Study of a Science Teacher in a Science Club Teaching Scientific Inquiry. In: Liang, L., Liu, X., Fulmer, G. (eds) Chinese Science Education in the 21st Century: Policy, Practice, and Research. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9864-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9864-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9863-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9864-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)