Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Making Sense of Cities: The Role of Maps in the Past, Present, and Future of Urban Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mapping Across Academia

Abstract

Cities are by definition complex and dynamic physical and social systems. Professionals charged with planning for and building our constantly-changing cities, including urban planners and designers, depend upon a wide range of maps and spatial technologies to make decisions. Planning is essentially a visual and spatial discipline where ideas, plans, arguments and empirical analyses are all expressed through paper and digital maps , including GIS (geographic information systems) . This chapter critically explores the way professional and academic planners who work in transportation, community and economic development , international development , environmental conservation , real estate and urban use maps at all scales . Maps will continue to be critical in planners’ efforts to understand the spatial form of cities and how residents conceive of places , make and analyze plans, model social and environmental impacts, engage citizens and hold government officials accountable. The interdisciplinary fields of public health , energy and sustainability and civic engagement are examined as opportunities for future collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Readings

  • Drummond, W. J., & French, S. P. (2008). The future of GIS in planning: Converging technologies and diverging interests. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(2), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D., & Daniels, T. (2011). The planners’ guide to communityviz. APA Planners Press and the Orton Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Bessis, N., Asimakopoulou, E., French, T., Norrington, P., & Xhafa, F. (2010). The big picture, from grids and clouds to crowds: A data collective computational intelligence case proposal for managing disasters. In P2P, parallel, grid, cloud, and Internet computing, international conference, pp. 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollens, S. A. (2004). Urban planning and intergroup conflict: Confronting a fractured public interest. In B. Stiftel & V. Watson (Eds.), Dialogues in urban & regional planning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugs, G., Garnell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010). An assessment of public participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27, 172–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed-methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M., & Weiner, D. (Eds.). (2002). Community participation and geographical information systems. New York: Taylor & Francis Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diep, F. (2011). Amateur cartographers map local ‘food desert’. Scientific American, February 28. Available at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=mapping-the-food-desert

  • Dodgson, J. S. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • DVRP (Delaware Valley Regional Planning Association). (2011). http://www.dvrpc.org/GetInvolved/TitleVI/

  • ESRI. (2010). Changing geography by design: Selected readings in geodesign. Redlands, CA: ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., Brennan, P. L., Skorpanich, M. A., & Held, D. (1984). Cognitive mapping and elderly adults: Verbal and location memory for urban landmarks. Journal of Gerontology, 39(4), 452–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2010 and 2011). HAZUS-MP. http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/hz_overview.shtm

  • Fishman, R. (1998). Beyond utopia: Urbanism after the end of cities. In Ciutat real, ciutat ideal. Significat i funció a l’espai urbà modern [Real city, ideal city. Signification and function in modern space.] Barcelona: Centre de Cultura Contemporània de Barcelona, 1998 (Urbanitats; 7). Available at http://www.cccb.org/rcs_gene/beyond_utopia.pdf

  • Forsyth, A., Slotterback, C. S., & Krizek, K. (2010). Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for planners: What tools are useful? Journal of Planning Literature, 24, 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foth, M., Bajracharya, B., Brown, R., & Hearn, G. (2009). The second life of urban planning? using NeoGeography tools for community engagement. Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G. (Ed.). (1999). Wayfinding behavior. Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M., & Lee, B. A. (1984). How urbanites define their neighbourhoods. Population and Environment, 7(1), 32–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadhazy, A. (2010). Lasers used to create 3-D model of New York City. TechNewsDaily, May 12. Available at http://www.technewsdaily.com/lasers-used-to-create-3-d-model-of-new-york-city-0548/

  • Halseth, G., & Doddridge, J. (2000). Children’s cognitive mapping: A potential tool for neighbourhood planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(4), 565–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. D., & Ullman, E. L. (1945). The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 242, 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, J. (2009). Redlining revisited: Mortgage lending patterns in Sacramento 1930–2004. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, A. (2003). Redlining and the home owners’ loan corporation. Journal of Urban History, 29(4), 394–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, A., & Culhane, D. (2012). GIS applications and administrative data to support community change. In M. Weil (Ed.), Handbook of community practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, A., Wernecke, M., & McKelvey, H. (2005). Removing barriers to the use of community information systems. Journal of Community Practice, 13(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, G. (2010). Lynch’s The Image of the City after 50 years: City marketing lessons from an urban planning classic. European Planning Studies, 18(12), 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. (1898). To-morrow: A peaceful path to real reform. London: Swan Sonnenschein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. (1902). Garden cities of to-morrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, H. (1939). The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American Cities. Washington, DC: Federal Housing Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M. (2002). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 645–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M., & Lee, J. (2005). Emergency response after 9/11: The potential of real-time 3D GIS for quick emergency response in micro-spatial environments. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. D., & Zhang, M. (2000). Using GIS to improve urban activity and forecasting models: Three examples. In S. A. Fotheringham & M. Wegener (Eds.), Spatial models and GIS: New potential and new methods. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Niu, M. (2011). Multiplayer gaming as a tool to build better communities. Proposal to the Graduate and Professional Student Association, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligmann-Zielinska, A., & Jankowski, P. (2007). Agent-based models as laboratories for spatially explicit planning policies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(2), 316–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis. (2011). CenTrax. Available at http://www.gomarquis.com/fair-lending-hmda-and-cra-software.aspx

  • Matthews, S. A., Detwiler, J. E., & Burton, L. M. (2005). Geo-ethnography: Coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica, 40(4), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NNIP (National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership). (2011). http://www2.urban.org/nnip/foreclosures.html

  • Northridge, M. E., & Sclar, E. (2003). A joint urban planning and public health framework: Contributions to health impact assessment. American Journal of Public Health, 93(1), 118–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. (1929). The neighbourhood unit as seen by Clarence A. Perry. New York Regional Survey, Vol. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PlaNYC. (2009). A greener, greater New York. New York City: Planning Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, D. (2006). From congestion to sprawl: Planning and health in historical context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, G. (Ed.). (1992). From redlining to reinvestment: Community responses to urban disinvestment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, C. D. (1990). Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling. New Jersey: Prentice Hall College Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D., & Daniels, T. (2011b). The planners guide to communityviz: The essential tool for a new generation of planning. Chicago: APA Planners Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, P. (2010). The world beyond GIS. Planning, 76(6), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Amy Hillier

Authors
  1. Amy Hillier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Hillier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kentucky Dept. Geography, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

    Stanley D. Brunn

  2. Geography, School of Environment and Dev, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

    Martin Dodge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hillier, A. (2017). Making Sense of Cities: The Role of Maps in the Past, Present, and Future of Urban Planning. In: Brunn, S., Dodge, M. (eds) Mapping Across Academia. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1011-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation