Abstract
In this chapter I propose an ‘archaeological’ approach to knowledge creation which takes seriously both the selfhood and identity of the learner, the values, attitudes and dispositions necessary for learning how to learn and the complexity of knowledge acquisition in the networked information society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bayliss, V. (2000). What should our children learn? Issues around a new curriculum. London: RSA.
Ben-Zvi, D., & Sfard, A. (2001). Learning mathematics as developing a discourse. In R. Speiser, C. Maher, & C. Walter, (Eds.). Proceedings of 21st conference of PME-NA (pp. 23-44). Columbus, OH: Clearing House for Science, mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Benjamin, W. (1999). The ArcadesProject. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Blishen, E. (1969). The school that I–d like. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, society and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cole, A., Small, T., & Deakin-Crick, R. (2007). Getting started: Learning power and young people not in education, employment or training. Bristol: ViTaL Partnerships
Deakin-Crick, R. (2007). Learning to learn: The dynamic assessment of learning power. Curriculum Journal, 18(2), 135-153.
Deakin-Crick, R., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The Elli project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 248-272
Deakin-Crick, R., & Yu, G. (2008). The effective lifelong learning inventory (Elli): Is it valid and reliable as a measurement tool? Education Research, 50(4), 387-402.
Department for Education and Skills (2005). Schools white paper higher standards, better schools for all. London: DfES.
Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting pupils what–s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, N. (2004). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the post modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilbert, C. (2006). 2020 Vision: Report of teaching and learning in 2020 review group. London: DfES.
Green Paper (2005). Every child matters. London: DfES.
Hargreaves, D. (2005). Personalising learning — curriculum advice and guidance. London: Specialist Schools Trust.
Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274-294
Hodkinson, V., & Hodkinson, P. (2006). Improving schoolteachers– workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 109-131.
James, M., Mccormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M., Fox, A., Macbeath, J., Marshall, B., Pedder, D., Procter, R., Swaffield, S., Swann, J., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Improving learning how to learn: Classrooms, schools and networks. London: Routledge.
Jaros, M. (2007). Towards a re-definition of space-ness in the post-mechanical age: Methodological notes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(1), 84-89.
Jaros, M., & Deakin-Crick, R. (2007). Personalised learning in the post mechanical age. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(4), 423-440.
Lave, J., & Wenger E. (1991). Situated learning legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Millner, N., Small, T., & Deakin-Crick, R. (2006). Learning by accident. Bristol: ViTaL Partnerships.
Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliot, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C., & Allender, J. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80–s. London: Merrill.
Rogers, C., & Stevens, B. (1973). Person to person: The problem of being human a new trend in psychology. London: Souvenir Press.
Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Ed.). (1984a). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rogoff, B., & Wertsch, J. (Ed.). (1984b). Children–s learning in the zone of proximal development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
RSA[The Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce] (2005). Opening minds giving young people a better chance. London: RSA. Retrieved from: http://wwwthersa.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/155125/RSA-Opening-minds-impact-update-2008-final.pdf
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Small, T. (2007). The learning agents. Bristol: ViTaL Partnerships.
Small, T., & Burn, M. (2006). The learning engineers: Bridging values and learning. Bristol: ViTaL Partnerships.
Stone, A. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deakin-Crick, R. (2012). Introduction. In: Personalisation of Education in Contexts. Comparative and International Education, vol 18. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-028-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-028-6_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-028-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)