Skip to main content
  • 7288 Accesses

Abstract

The rate at which structural equation modeling (SEM) has grown over the past 30 years or so has been truly quite remarkable! At least one interesting offshoot of this escalation, however, has been the somewhat parallel growth of computer software capable of handling the statistical rigors demanded by the SEM methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). AMOS18 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psychometrika, 45, 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C.-P, Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for nonnormal data in covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West. S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5, and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L-T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). New developments in LISREL: Analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 24, 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 59, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993a). New features in LISREL 8. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993b). LISREL 8. Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.8. for Windows. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. -Y., Poon, W. -Y., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). A two-stage estimation of structural equation

    Google Scholar 

  • models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach burnout inventory manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of nonnonnormal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Technical report. UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi square statistics in covariance structure analysis. American statistical association 1988 Proceedings of the business and economic sections (pp. 308–313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stine, R. A. (1989). An introduction to bootstrap methods: Examples and ideas. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 243–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modeling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In M. P. Becker (Ed.), Sociological methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yung, Y-F., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 195–226). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W. (1997). Making bootstrap statistical inferences: A tutorial. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Byrne, B.M. (2013). Selecting Sem Computer Programs. In: Teo, T. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-404-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics