Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explanation and Prediction in Technology Education

  • Chapter
Technology Teachers as Researchers

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 10))

  • 567 Accesses

Abstract

All three answers above are examples of explanations. Which is preferable depends on the context where the question is posed. In everyday language, an explanation is a relevant answer to a real or imagined question of why or how type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiken, T. (2004). MOS air quality sensors make vehicle cabins safer. Sensors, 21(2), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • AlfrEds.on, A., Bjärbo, A., Hjort, G., Lindén, B.-E., Norberg, R., & Nyberg, Y. (2003). Teknisk basbok [Technological base book]. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. J., Belloni, M., Dancy, M., & Christian, W. (2003). Otto engine. URL http://webphysics.davidson.edu/physlet_resources/thermo_paper/thermo/examples/otto_engine.html. Accessed January 21, 2012.

  • Department for Education and Skills (2004/1999). The national curriculum for England – Design and technology; Key stages 1–4. London: Department for Education and Skills. URL http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/secondary/b00199489/dt. Accessed January 21, 2012.

  • de Ridder, J. (2006). The (Alleged) Inherent normativity of technological explanations. Techné, 10(1). URL http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v10n1/deridder.html. Accessed January 21, 2012.

  • de Ridder, J. (2007). Reconstructing design, explaining artifacts. Doctoral dissertation from the Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, D., Walløe, L., & Elster, J. (1993). Argumentationsteori, språk och vetenskapsfilosofi [Argumentation theory, language, and philosophy of science]. Stockholm: Thales.

    Google Scholar 

  • France, B., Compton, V. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). Understanding modelling in technology and science: The potential of stories from the field. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. DOI 10.1007/s10798.010.9126–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garratt, J. (1996/1991). Design and technology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to More Authentic Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Explanations with models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 192–208). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, J., & Strömdahl, H. (2010). Perspective on models in theoretical and practical traditions of knowledge: The example of Otto engine animations. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. DOI: 10.1007/s10798.010.9146–0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O. (2007). What is technological science? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 38(3), 523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 567–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, R. L. (1989). Power from steam. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Houkes, W., & Vermaas, P. E. (2002). Design and use as plans: An action-theoretical account. Design Studies, 23, 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Technology Education Association (2007). Standards for technological literacy (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association. URL http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2011

  • Kempton, W. (1986). Two theories of home heat control. Cognitive Science, 10, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P. (1998). Technological Explanations: The relation between structure and function of technological objects. Techné, 3(3). URL http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v3n3/KROES.html. Accessed November 30, 2011.

  • Levy, S. T., & Mioduser, D. (2008). Does it “want” or “was it programmed to…”? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 337–359. DOI 10.1007/s10798.007.9032–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A-S. (2004). Heat sink fastener. US Patent 6,731,504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norström, P. (2011). Engineers’ non-scientific models in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. DOI: 10.1007/s10798.011.9184–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Smith, S. (1926). An all-electric house. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 64(351), 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J. C. (2009). Technological explanation. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (pp. 861–879). Burlington, MA: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rasinen, A. (2003). An analysis of the technology education curriculum in six countries. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the Concept of “Curriculum Emphases” in Science Education. Science Education, 66(2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl, G. (1997). Knowledge types in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1988/1962). Explanations, predictions and laws. In J. C. Pitt (Ed.), Theories of explanation (pp. 51–74). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, S. (2004). Grundbok teknik [First book technology]. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket (2011a). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. URL http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2687. Accessed January 21, 2012.

  • Skolverket (2011b) Kommentarmaterial till kursplanen i teknik [Comments to the syllabus in technology]. Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. URL http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2568.Accessed January 21, 2012.

  • TIMLOTO [Technische Informatica Motorvoertuigen Leerweg Open Technisch Onderwijs] (2007). URL http://www.timloto.org/pictures/motor_wout3.gif. Accessed January 21, 2012.

  • Vaesen, K. (2008). A philosophical essay on artifacts and norms. Doctoral dissertation from Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermaas, P. E. (2010). Focussing philosophy of engineering: Analyses of technical functions and beyond. In I. van de Poel & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering (pp. 61–73). DOI 10.1007/978–90-481–2804-4_6. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

  • von Wright G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wash, R. (2010). Folk Models of Home Computer Security. Conference paper from the Symposium on Usable privacy and security, Redmond, WA. URL http://prisms.cs.umass.edu/cs660sp11/papers/rwash-homesec-soups10-final.pdf. Accessed January 21, 2012.

Download references

Authors
  1. Per Norström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Inga-Britt Skogh

  2. Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

    Marc J. De Vries

  3. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Marc J. De Vries

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Norström, P. (2013). Explanation and Prediction in Technology Education. In: Skogh, IB., Vries, M.J.D. (eds) Technology Teachers as Researchers. International Technology Education Studies, vol 10. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-443-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation