Skip to main content

Moving towards Comprehensive Induction Systems for New Teachers of Science through the Use of Technology Enhanced Communities of Practice

  • Chapter
Newly Hired Teachers of Science

Abstract

Professional development experiences for new teachers of science, called induction programs, help teachers progress along a continuum of development from a pre-service educator towards becoming a science education leader (Sato, Roehrig, & Donna, 2010). It is important that these induction programs provide content-specific support (e.g., support for teaching physics) and context-specific support (e.g., teaching students within an urban school) (Luft, 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. Abell & N. Lederman, Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S. Z. (2006). Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, E., & Raizen, S. (2003). Comprehensive teacher education induction in five countries: Implications for supporting U.S. science teachers. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Science teacher retention: Mentoring and renewal (Issues in Science Education) (pp. 13–21). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wie, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Stelios, O. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering, A., Miller, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Adventure learning: Educational, social, and technological affordances for collaborative hybrid distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donna, J. D. (2009). Surviving and thriving as a new science teacher: Exploring the role of comprehensive online induction (Doctoral dissertation). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donna, J. D., & Hick, S. R. (2015, January). Warming up to teaching and learning science the NGSS way: Results from a year 1 pilot of an on-line educative curriculum guide on convection. Paper presented at the Association of Science Teacher Educators International Conference, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, K., Yoon, C., & Lee, C. (2005). Induction into learning communities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, L., Denton, C., & Kurz, T. (2008). Technologically-based mentoring provided to teachers: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 339–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world : What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, M., & Romiszowski, A. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium, Science Standards Drafting Committee (2002). Model standards in science for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, R., Moir, E., Swanson, E., & Wheeler, G. (2006). EMentoring for Student Success. In C. Dede (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 89–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J. B., & Kronebusch, M. (2003). Science teacher education: From a fractured system to a seamless continuum. Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 585–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J., Kreijn, K., & Jelle Beers, P. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T., & Bradbury, L. (2009). Mentoring in support of science teaching. In A. Collins & N. Gillespie (Eds.), The continuum of secondary science teacher preparation: Knowledge, questions, and research recommendations (pp. 171–187). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. (2003). Induction programs for science teachers: What the research says. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Science teacher retention: Mentoring and renewal (Issues in Science Education) (pp. 34–45). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works (Vol. 5). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M., Roerhig, G. H., & Donna, J. D. (2010). Bending the professional teaching continuum: How teacher renewal supports teacher retention. In J. Rhoton (Ed.), Science education leadership: Best practices for the new century. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? Information Society, 13(3), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Odell, S., & Schwill, S. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donna, J.D., Roehrig, G.H. (2015). Moving towards Comprehensive Induction Systems for New Teachers of Science through the Use of Technology Enhanced Communities of Practice. In: Luft, J.A., Dubois, S.L. (eds) Newly Hired Teachers of Science. Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-283-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics