Skip to main content

Analysing Peer Pedagogic Practices as a Positive Contribution to Academic Professional Development

A Strategic Approach to Improving Faculty Teaching

  • Chapter
Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching

Part of the book series: Professional Learning ((PROFL))

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the landscape of higher education teaching has been changing from the historical paradigm of a teacher-centric to a more student-centric experience. Calkins and Light (2008) reported a number of critical issues and debates that have been the impetus behind the evolving nature of higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altrichter, H., Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2002). The concept of action research. The Learning Organisation, 9(3), 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for Higher Education (AAHE). (1995). From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching – Choosing from a menu of strategies. Washington, DC: The American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university: In an age of super complexity. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: A program of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). London, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Berkshire, England: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the observed learning outcome). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Endowment for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feed back to improve teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 574–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1995). Surprised by the familiar: Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press Calkins, S., & Light, G. (2008). University teaching. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century reference series (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, P., & Stoakes, G. (2011). Introducing ‘SandRA’: Visual representation of the research – Teaching nexus as a tool in the dissemination of a new research strategy. Higher Education Quarterly, 65, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, R. (2007). Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London, England: Croom Helm. French, S. (2009). Action research for practising managers. Journal of Management Development, 28(3), 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2003). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education. London, England: Kogan Page Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassick, C., Huber, M., & Maeroff, G. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, D., Patel, F., Salah, S., Robbins, J., Smigiel, H., & Wilson, A. (2011). Perceptions of optimal conditions for teaching and learning: A case study from flinders university. Higher Education Research & Development, 1, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith University. (2009). The Griffith PRO-Teaching project. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/learning-teaching/quality/peer-review-of-teaching/pro-teaching

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith University. (2013). Principles to promote excellence in learning and teaching practices at Griffith university. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/120201/PrinciplesLandT.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. (2013). So you think you are doing action research? Indicators of enactment of participatory action research in higher education. Action Learning Action Research Journal, 19(1), 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillon, M. E., & Boje, D. M. (2007). The social ecology of action research. Management Research News, 30(5), 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, V. (1997). Lectures and the experience of relevance (Chapter 10). In P. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounsell, D. (2009). Evaluating courses and teaching. In H. Fry, S. Ketteredge, & S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education (3rd ed., pp. 40–57). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P., & Walsh, L. (2006). Developing your teaching. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K.-L., Green, A., Arkoudis, S., James, R., Jennings, C., & McCulloch, R. (2008). The teachingresearch nexus: A guide for academics and policy-makers in higher education. Retrieved from http://trnexus.edu.au

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers of group dynamics: II, Channels of group life, social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, L., & Nicholls, G. (2005). Enhancing teaching quality through peer review of teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. In A. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109–113). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (2011). Images of changing practice through reflective action research. Journal of Organisation Change Management, 24(2), 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London, England: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., & Robinson, V. (1984). The origins and status of action research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pill, S., & Brown, R. (2009). Peer observation of teaching: An optimistic approach for collegiate professional development. Action Learning Action Research Journal, 15(2), 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. D. (1997). Reconceptualising the evaluation of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 34, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman F. T., & Torbert, W. R. (2000). Transforming social inquiry, transforming social action: New paradigms for crossing the theory/practice divide in universities and communities. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, A. M. (2009). A ‘teaching excellence’ for the times we live in. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. (2001). Judging university teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimitat, C. (2006). First year students’ perceptions of the importance of good teaching: Not all things are equal. Proceedings of HERDA 2006, 386–392.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, O., Main, K. (2015). Analysing Peer Pedagogic Practices as a Positive Contribution to Academic Professional Development. In: Klopper, C., Drew, S. (eds) Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching. Professional Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-289-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics