Abstract
As a top-performing country in international assessments of student achievement (Mullis et al., 2008; Mullis et al., 2012; OECD, 2004, 2010, 2014a), Singapore has aroused great attention among educators, researchers, and policy makers around the world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abd. Ghagar, M. N., Othman, R., & Mohammadpour, E. (2011). Multilevel analysis of achievement in mathematics of Malaysian and Singaporean students. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 285–304.
Bloom, B. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Borman, G. D., & Dowling, M. (2010). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s equality of educational opportunity data. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1201–1246.
Cadigan, F., Wei, Y., & Clifton, R. A. (2013). Mathematic achievement of Canadian private school students. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 662–673.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of learning. Teacher College Record, 64, 723–733.
Chen, Q. (2014). Using TIMSS 2007 data to build mathematics achievement model of fourth graders in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1519–1545. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9505-x
Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2010). Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement: Cultural differences among fifteen-year-olds in 34 countries. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 2–17. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.002
Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., & Weinfeld, F. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
Güzel, Çİ., & Berberoğlu, G. (2010). Students’ affective characteristics and their relation to mathematical literacy measures in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 93–113.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science Education, 314, 599–600. doi:10.1126/science.1132154
Ker, H. W. (2015). The impacts of student-, teacher- and school-level factors on mathematics achievement: An exploratory comparative investigation of Singaporean students and the USA students. Educational Psychology, 1–23. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1026801
Lee, J., & Shute, V. J. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic peferomance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychology, 45(3), 185–202. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.493471
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 35–51.
Leung, F. K. S. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different culture: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Springer.
Mohammadpour, E. (2012a). Factors accounting for mathematics achievement of Singaporean eighth-graders. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 507–518.
Mohammadpour, E. (2012b). A multilevel study on trends in Malaysian secondary school students’ science achievement and associated school and student predictors. Science Education, 96(6), 1013–1046. doi:10.1002/sce.21028
Mohammadpour, E. (2013). A three-level multilevel analysis of Singaporean eighth-graders science achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 212–220. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.005
Mohammadpour, E., & Ghafar, M. N. A. (2012). Mathematics achievement as a function of within- and between-school differences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–33. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2012.725097
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades.
Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
OECD. (2004). First results from PISA 2003: Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to learn students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013c). PISA 2012 Results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 Results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know: Key results from PISA 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 technical report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2012technicalreport.htm
Park, K. (2004). Factors contributing to East Asian students’ high achievement: Focusing on East Asian teachers and their teaching. Paper presented at the APEC Educational Reform Summit, Beijing, China.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in sample surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2004). Multilevel models for school effectiveness research. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 235–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Senler, B., & Sungur, S. (2009). Parental influences on students’ self-concept, task value beliefs, and achievement in science. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 106–117. doi:10.1017/S1138741600001529
Shannag, Q. A., Tairab, H., Dodeen, H., & Abdel-Fattah, F. (2013). Linking teachers’ quality and student achievement in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Singapore: The impact of teachers’ background variables on student achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 652–665.
Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L., & Oakes, J. (1991). Steps in designing an indicator system. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(12). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=12
Shin, J., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2009). Student and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: International comparisons between Korea, Japan and the USA. School Psychology International, 30(5), 520–537.
Soh, K. (2013). Finland and Singapore in PISA 2009: Similarities and differences in achievements and school management. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.787286
Sun, L., Bradley, K. D., & Akers, K. (2012). A multilevel modelling approach to investigating factors impacting science achievement for secondary school students: PISA Hong Kong sample. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2107–2125. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.708063
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Teodorović, J. (2012). Student background factors influencing student achievement in Serbia. Educational Studies, 38(1), 89–110. doi:10.1080/03055698.2011.567027
Toh, K. A., & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (Eds.). (2002). The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) – A look at Singapore students’ performance and classroom practice. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Walberg, H. J. (2003). Improving educational productivity. Washington, DC: Education Resources Information Center.
Wang, Z., Osterlind, S., & Bergin, D. (2012). Building mathematics achievement models in four countries using TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1215–1242. doi:10.1007/s10763-011-9328-6
Wößmann, L. (2005). Educational production in East Asia: The impact of family background and schooling policies on student performance. German Economic Review, 6, 331–353. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2005.00136.x
Wu, M. (2009). A comparison of PISA and TIMSS 2003 achievement results in mathematics. Prospects, 39, 33–46. doi:10.1007/s11125-009-9109-y
Yang, Y. (2003). Dimensions of socio-economic status and their relationship to mathematics and science achievement at individual and collective Levels. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 21. doi:10.1080/00313830308609
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, Q. (2016). A Multilevel Analysis of Singaporean Students’ Mathematics Performance in PISA 2012. In: Thien, L.M., Razak, N.A., Keeves, J.P., Darmawan, I.G.N. (eds) What Can PISA 2012 Data Tell Us?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-468-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-468-8_2
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-468-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)