Abstract
This book’s introductory chapter discusses the rapidly growing academic conversation occurring around learning environment research. It highlights one significant gap in the literature in this field; the evaluation of such spaces. Its conclusion isn’t that little research has been done to document impact, but what has been done has been too particular in focus and method, therefore being limited in its usefulness to practitioners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, B. (2004). Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education. Educause Review, 39(5), 28.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12.
Beichner, R. J., & Saul, J. M. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE-UP (student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs) project. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi,” Varenna, Italy.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dugdale, S., Torino, R., & Felix, E. (2009). A case study in master planning the learning landscape hub concepts for the University at Buffalo. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32(1).
Duggan, F. (2004). The changing nature of the studio as an educational setting. Transactions, 1(2), 70–76. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/tran.2004.01020070
Harrison, A. (2006). Working to learn, learning to work: Design in educational transformation. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Founder’s Lecture, Royal College of Physicians, London.
Harrison, A., & Hutton, L. (2014). Design for the changing educational landscape. London: Routledge.
Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jamieson, P. (2009). The serious matter of informal learning: From the development of learning spaces to a broader understanding of the entire campus as a learning space. Planning For Higher Education, 37(2), 18.
Jamieson, P., Fisher, K., Gilding, T., Taylor, P. G., & Trevitt, A. C. F. (2000). Place and space in the design of new learning environments. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 221.
Koch, A., Schwennsen, K., Dutton, T., & Smith, D. (2002). The redesign of studio culture: A report of the AIAS studio culture task force. Studio Culture Task Force, The American Institute of Architecture Students-AIAS, Washington, DC.
Kostof, S. (1977). The architect. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mewburn, I. (2011). Lost in translation: Reconsidering reflective practice and design studio pedagogy. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(4), 363–379. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474022210393912
Neary, M., Harrison, A., Crelin, G., Parekh, N., Saunders, G., Duggan, F., & Austin, S. (2010). Learning landscapes in higher education (p. 29). Lincoln: University of Lincoln.
Nussbaum-Beach, S., & Hall, L. R. (2012). The connected educator: Learning and leading in a digital age. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Oblinger, D. (2005). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1(7–12).
Osborne, L., Franz, J., Savage, S., & Crowther, P. (2011). Dichotomy in the design studio: Adapting to new blended learning environments. ICERI2011 Proceedings, 5579–5588.
Osborne, L., Franz, J., Savage, S., & Crowther, P. (2012). Dichotomy in the design studio 2.0: Adapting to new blended learning environments. The Fourth Asian Conference on Education 2012, Osaka, Japan. Retrieved from http://iafor.org/ace2012.html
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.What works ? Emerging isues63
Shreeve, A. (2012). The way we were? Signature pedagogies under threat. The 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers DRS/Cumulus Conference, Paris, France.
Shulman, L. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
TEFMA: Tertiary Education Facilities Management Association. (2009). Space planning guideline (3rd ed.). Sydney: TEFMA Publication.
Temple, P. (2007). Learning spaces for the 21st century: A review of the literature. London: Higher Educatino Academy.
What is connected learning? Connected learning. (2014, January). Retrieved from http://connectedlearning.tv/what-is-connected-learning
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Osborne, L. (2016). What Works? Emerging Issues. In: Imms, W., Cleveland, B., Fisher, K. (eds) Evaluating Learning Environments. Advances in Learning Environments Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-1_4
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-537-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)