Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Student A/R/Tographers Creating Cellphilms

  • Chapter
What’s a Cellphilm?

Abstract

From 2011 to 2015, the Digital Economy Research Team (DERT), working with Prince Edward Island (PEI) teachers on a large scale new literacies project, developed a threshold concept map to describe the key literacies students and teachers would need to create effective content regardless of the medium, mode, or technology employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Biesta, G. (2012). Receiving the gift of teaching: From “learning from” to “being taught by.” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(5), 449–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2008). Education, globalization and the future of the knowledge economy. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research in new literacies (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C., & Bennett, L. (2007). Does using a computer disturb the organization of children’s writing? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(2), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutro, E., Selland, M. K., & Bien, A. C. (2013). Revealing writing, concealing writers: High-stakes assessment in an urban elementary classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(2), 99–141. doi:10.1177/1086296X13475621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gikas, J. (2011). Understanding change: Implementing MCDs in higher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, K. (2015). From lists to images: Exploring the concept of the good teacher in teacher education. Journal of the Canadian Association of Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, A. (2009). Incorporating mobile technologies within constructivist-based curriculum resources. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 56–62). Wollongong, AU: University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, R. L., & O’Donoghue, D. (2012). Encountering pedagogy through relational art practices. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 31(3), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, R. L., Beer, R., Springgay, S., & Grauer, K. (2006). The rhizomatic relations of a/r/tography. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 70–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., Jones, K., & Kress, G. (2009). Changing English? The impact of technology and policy on a school subject in the 21st century. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). NMC horizon report: 2012 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://nmc.org/pdf/2012-horizon-report-K12.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (2003). The theory of the market economy and the social foundations of innovative enterprise. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(1), 9–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenheart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 210–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (2008). Handbook of writing research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. (2006). The gift of curriculum method. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 8(1–2), 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, J. (2013). Selected haiku. Daily Haiku, 14. Retrieved from http://www.dailyhaiku.org/haiku/2013-march-01

  • Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., & The Deep-Play Research Group. (2013). A new approach to defining and measuring creativity. TechTrends, 57(5), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923–949). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, C., & Scott, K. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions and changing contexts (pp. 732–755). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172–194). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, R. (2010). Connectivity: A framework for understanding effective language teaching in face-to-face and online learning communities. RELC Journal, 41(2) 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., Leggo, C., & Gouzouasis, P. (2008). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S. (2008). Resonation in writing. In S. Springgay, R. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. 95–107). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S. (2010). A poet’s journey as a/r/togrpher: Teaching poetry to create a community of practice with junior high school students. Learning Landscapes, 4(1), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S., & Altass, P. (in press). Multiliteracies threshold concepts: A guide for teachers. Charlottetown, PE: Island Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S., & MacDonald, C. (2013). Passion and recognition in teacher’s work lives. In E. Lyle (Ed.), Bridging theory & practice: Pedagogical enactment for socially just education. Big Tancook Island, NS: Backalong Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S., & Morrison-Robinson, D. (2013). Becoming a/r/tographers while contesting rationalist discourses of work. Multi-Disciplinary Research in the Arts, 3(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S., Sameshima, P., Irwin, R., Leggo, C., Grauer, K., & Gouzouasis, P. (2007). Re-imagining arts integration: Rhizomatic relations to the everyday. Journal of Educational Thought, 41(3), 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S., Gabriel, M. A., MacDonald, R. J., McAuley, A., & Moffatt, L. (2013, June). Utilizing a threshold space to teach writing in digital economy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, University of Victoria, British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S., MacDonald, R., & Moffatt, L. (2014, May). A threshold concept heuristic for exploring student agency in literacy practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Brock University. St. Catharines, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsey, T. D., & Grisham, D. L. (2007). Adolescents and the new literacies: Writing engagement. Action in Teacher Education, 29(2), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City University of Hong Kong, Island

    Sean Wiebe

  2. English Language School Board, Prince Edward, Island

    Claire Caseley Smith

Authors
  1. Sean Wiebe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire Caseley Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. McGill University, Canada

    Katie MacEntee

  2. McGill University, Canada

    Casey Burkholder

  3. McGill University, Canada

    Joshua Schwab-Cartas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiebe, S., Smith, C.C. (2016). Student A/R/Tographers Creating Cellphilms. In: MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., Schwab-Cartas, J. (eds) What’s a Cellphilm?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_6

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-573-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation