Skip to main content

Trade and Environmental Responsibility for Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Case of South Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 25))

  • 550 Accesses

Abstract

A significant amount of embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have been and are currently being traded in the globalized economy. The conventional territorial approach to the control of GHGs released within a country fails to account for a large portion of GHGs for which a country may take responsibility, particularly from the perspective of consumption. Given the large volume of products traded among nations, a series of studies have underscored the need for the global monitoring of GHG emissions not only generated from production but also driven by consumptive activities. This study develops time-series GHG emission inventories from 1995 to 2009 from both production- and consumption-based perspectives in the case of South Korea and analyzes the factors that influence the increase and the decrease of GHG emissions. This empirical analysis has determined that production-based activities are more responsible for GHG emissions in South Korea than consumption-based activities. The analysis also found that the trade surplus of embodied GHG emissions in South Korea ranged from 0.31 to 1.01 tons per capita. A decomposition analysis showed that developments in environmental technology play a significant role in the reduction of GHG emissions, associated with a 45 % gross change in GHG emissions. However, this reduction was offset by increases in demand and changes in the input structure to energy-intensive sectors. The change of input structure is a critical factor contributing to trend in increasing embodied GHG emissions in not only South Korea but also nations linked with global trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrew, R., and V. Forgie. 2008. A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand. Ecological Economics 68(1–2): 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J., G. Peters, T. Wiedmann, K. Scott, M. Lenzen, K. Roelich, and C. Le Quéré. 2013. Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: A UK case study. Climate Policy 13(4): 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. 2015. Understanding environmental responsibility of cities and emissions embodied in trade. Economic Systems Research 27(2): 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, P., and M. Narodoslawsky. 1999. What environmental pressures are a region’s industries responsible for? A method of analysis with descriptive indices and input–output models. Ecological Economics 29(3): 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, P., D. Allaway, M. Lazarus, and E.A. Stanton. 2012. A consumption-based GHG inventory for the U.S. state of Oregon. Environmental Science & Technology 46(7): 3679–3686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.M., and D.M. Kammen. 2011. Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environmental Science & Technology 45(9): 4088–4095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., and J. Murray. 2010. Conceptualising environmental responsibility. Ecological Economics 70(2): 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., and G.M. Peters. 2010. How city dwellers affect their resource hinterland. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(1): 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., J. Murray, F. Sack, and T. Wiedmann. 2007. Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice. Ecological Economics 61(1): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., and C.N. Hewitt. 2008. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy 36(6): 1907–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, A., J. Rodrigues, M. Lenzen, and T. Domingos. 2012. Income-based environmental responsibility. Ecological Economics 84: 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.E., and P.D. Blair. 2009. Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, J., J. Phillips, and Y. Chen. 2008. China’s balance of emissions embodied in trade: Approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24(2): 354–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G.P., J.C. Minx, C.L. Weber, and O. Edenhofer. 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(21): 8903–8908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, J., T. Domingos, S. Giljum, and F. Schneider. 2006. Designing an indicator of environmental responsibility. Ecological Economics 59(3): 256–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, M., and E. Dietzenbacher. 2010. Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches. Ecological Economics 69(11): 2224–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, M.P., E. Dietzenbacher, B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G.J. Vries. 2015. An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics. 23: 575–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K., M. Munday, S. McIntyre, and C.D. Jensen. 2011. Incorporating jurisdiction issues into regional carbon accounts under production and consumption accounting principles. Environment and Planning A 43(3): 722–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. 2014. International Trade Statistics 2014. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2014_e/its14_toc_e.htm. Accessed 10 Aug 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taelim Choi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choi, T. (2016). Trade and Environmental Responsibility for Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Case of South Korea. In: Kim, E., Kim, B. (eds) Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0300-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0300-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0298-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0300-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics