Skip to main content

Perceived Usefulness and Relevance of ePortfolios in the Creative Arts: Investigating Student Views

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ePortfolios in Australian Universities

Abstract

While research into ePortfolios in educational environments has increased in the past 15 years, the focus has been most strongly on the views of academics, those instigating use, and rarely on students (the users). This chapter intentionally draws out the views of three cohorts of undergraduate music students in two Australian universities, seeking their responses on use of a variety of ePortfolios approaches. These range from a proprietary ePortfolio platform chosen by one university, to self-selected systems leveraging cloud-based and social media platforms at another. In doing so, the study not only adds to a growing literature about ePortfolio use in the creative arts, it also offers student views across the self-selected/non-selected platform issue and longer term and short term use of the ePortfolio. The study sought responses on students’ perceived usefulness of the ePortfolio platform for their current and future career post-graduation needs. Shaping the discussion is a perceived usefulness of ePortfolios and technology acceptance model drawn from other new technologies in contexts beyond universities, but tailored by our findings, into a creative arts version of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alter, J. B. (2002). Self-appraisal and pedagogical practice: Performance-based assessment approaches. Dance Research Journal, 34(2), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, W. I., & Dunn, R. E. (2003). The electronic portfolio in music teacher education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 13(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade – How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. H., & Lind, V. R. (2003). Preservice music teacher electronic portfolios integrating reflection and technology. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 12(2), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, S. M. (2008). Portfolio assessment. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 443–453). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, A., Hafer, J., & Blankenburg, K. (2007). e-Portfolios for artists at the University of Arts Berlin. Paper presented at the ePortfolio 2007 conference, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.eife-l.org/publications/eportfolio/proceedings2/ep2007/papers/eportfolio/e-portfolios-for-artists-at-the-university-of-arts-berlin/view

  • Castiglione, L. V. (1996). Portfolio assessment in art and education. Arts Education Policy Review, 97(4), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, A. O., & Cleveland, M. B. (2004). Coming of age in a digital world: The portfolio grows up. Theatre Design & Technology, 40(2), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T., Gould, C., Hainey, T., Waugh, S., & Boyle, B. (2010). An empirical study: The implementation of a virtual learning environment and ePortfolio. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989, September). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneen, C. C. (2013). Eportfolios in a higher education context: Preliminary findings on assessment and technology issues. Journal of Information Systems Technology & Planning, 6(17), 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. (2007). Before the eyes glaze over. Music Forum, 13(1), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S., & Brown, A. (2006). The art of ePortfolios: Insights from the creative arts experience. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 420–433). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (2007). e-Reflective journal production by UTS visual arts education students: Function, nature and assessment. In E. Hartnell-Young (Ed.), ePortfolio Australia: Imagining new literacies (pp. 58–61). Melbourne, Australia: ePortfolio Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, D. (2008, September). Digital portfolios in visual arts classrooms. Art Education (Winter), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, N. (2011). An eportfolio design supporting ownership, social learning, and ease of use. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (2011). The empty raincoat: Making sense of the future. London: Random House Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. B. (1989). Making managers. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. F. (2008). A portfolio model for music educators. Music Educators Journal, 95(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leijen, A., Admiraal, W., Wildschut, L., & Simons, P. R-J. (2008, June). Students’ perspectives on e-learning and the use of a virtual learning environment in dance education. Research in Dance Education, 9(2), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGreevy-Nichols, S. (1999). It’s academic: For the record. Dance Teacher, 21(9), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E. J., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55(1), 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. M. (2009). Portfolios that wow. Stage Directions, 22(9), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreck, B. (2007). To see and to share: Evaluating the dance experience in education. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 341–356). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. (2006). Purpose, audience and engagement in Spelman College’s eFolio project. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 259–272). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, M., & Levy, R. (2009). Assessing the future: E-portfolio trends, uses, and options in higher education. Research Bulletin, 4, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, L. (2008). How to market and sell your art, music, photographs, and handmade crafts. Ocala, FL: Atlantic Publishing Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J., & Dunbar-Hall, P. (2016). ePortfolios in a music faculty: Student differentiations in expectations, applications and uses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, G. (2006). Instructional roles of electronic portfolios. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 1–14). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, D. (2002). Creating a living portfolio: Documenting student growth with electronic portfolios. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silveira, J. M. (2013, March). Portfolios and assessment in music classes. Music Educators Journal, 15–24. http://mej.sagepub.com

  • Thornton, L., Ferris, N., Johnson, G., Kidwai, K., & Ching, Y.-H. (2011). The impact of an ePortfolio program in a music education curriculum. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R., Abrami, P. C., Brook, J., Troop, M., & Catalana, L. (2010). Using ePEARL for music teaching: A case study. In Proceedings of the international association for scientific knowledge conference (pp. 36–45). http://www.wintergreenstudios.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ePEARL_Studio_paper-Upitis-et-al.pdf

  • Van Tartwijk, J., & Driessen, E. W. (2009). Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Medical Teacher, 31(9), 790–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz, P. (2006). An overview of student ePortfolio functions. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 194–205). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this research was provided by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching (OLT). The views of this project do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Blom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blom, D., Hitchcock, M. (2017). Perceived Usefulness and Relevance of ePortfolios in the Creative Arts: Investigating Student Views. In: Rowley, J. (eds) ePortfolios in Australian Universities. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1732-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1732-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1731-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1732-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics