Abstract
In this chapter, I concentrate on success as the completion of a degree and investigate mathematics as a key component in that success. I examine the connections between approaches to learning, conceptions of mathematics, and student performance as measured by their grades. This study highlights practical implications for mathematics in higher education, draws from the comprehensive report of the Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments project by Hounsell and Entwistle (ETL shortened experiences of teaching and learning questionnaire [measurement instrument] 2005), and extends the international research on student conceptions of mathematics by Wood et al. (Becoming a mathematician, Springer, Dordrecht 2012). Surveys were used to investigate the learning experience of a random sample of first year mathematics students in Australia and New Zealand. This chapter highlights two key findings of relevance to teachers and curriculum developers: firstly, that successful mathematics performance was strongly associated with deep approaches to learning, organised approaches to learning, and a cohesive conception of mathematics; and secondly, that surface approaches to learning were negatively related to modelling and the abstract conceptions of mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Developing the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Brown, G. (2010). Review of education in mathematics, data science and quantitative disciplines. Retrieved from https://go8.edu.au/publication/go8-review-education-mathematics-data-science-and-quantitative-disciplines
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cano, F., & Berbén, A. B. G. (2009). University students’ achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 131–153.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 331–345
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998a). Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematics at university. Learning and Instruction, 8(5), 455–468. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(98)00005-x
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998b). University mathematics students’ conceptions of mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23(1), 87.
Croft, A. C., Harrison, M. C., & Robinson, C. L. (2009). Recruitment and retention of students—An integrated and holistic vision of mathematics support. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 40(1), 109–125.
Dancey, C., & Reidy, J. (2004). Statistics without maths for psychology: Using SPSS for windows. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2011). Developing a framework for teaching and learning standards in Australian higher education and the role of TEQSA. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Entwistle, N. (2005, September). Ways of thinking and ways of teaching across contrasting subject areas. Paper presented at the 13th improving student learning symposium: Improving student learning through assessment, London, UK.
Entwistle, N., Nisbet, J., & Bromage, A. (2005). Teaching-learning environments and student learning in electronic engineering. In L. Verschaffel, E. D. Corte, G. Kanselaar, & M. Valcke (Eds.), Powerful environments for promoting deep conceptual and strategic learning. Studia Paedagogica 41 (pp. 175–198). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873–891. doi:10.1348/000709907X189118
Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (2005). ETL shortened experiences of teaching and learning questionnaire [Measurement Instrument]. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html#measurement
Hounsell, D., Entwistle, N., Anderson, C., Bromage, A., Day, K., Hounsell, J., et al. (2005). Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses: End-of award report to ESRC. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/
International Engineering Alliance. (2009). Graduate attributes and professional competencies profile. Retrieved from http://www.ieagreements.org
Khiat, H. (2010). A grounded theory approach: Conceptions of understanding in engineering mathematics learning. The Qualitative Report, 15, 1459–1488.
Lai, P., & Biggs, J. B. (1994). Who benefits from mastery learning? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 13–23.
Liston, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2009). Factors influencing the transition to university service mathematics: Part 1. A quantitative study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 28(2), 77–87. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrp006
Macbean, J. (2004). Students’ conceptions of, and approaches to, studying mathematics as a service subject at undergraduate level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 35(4), 553–564.
Manukau Institute of Technology. (2014). Annual report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.manukau.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/193987/MKT070-2014-Annual-Report-LRES.pdf
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Nardi, P. M. (2006). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods (2nd ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson Education Inc.
New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission. (2014). Tertiary education strategy: 2014–2019. Retrieved from http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Further-education/Tertiary-Education-Strategy.pdf
Organization for Economic Cooperation Development. (2013). Assessment of higher education learning outcomes feasibility study report: Volume 3. Further insights. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/AHELOFSReportVolume3.pdf
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (2005). The context of learning in academic departments. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 198–216). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
Richardson, J. (2005). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25(3), 673–680.
Senko, C., & Miles, M. K. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 561–583.
Solomon, Y., Croft, T., & Lawson, D. (2010). Safety in numbers: Mathematics support centres and their derivatives as social learning spaces. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 421–431.
Taylor, J. A., & Morgan, M. J. (1999). Mathematics support program for commencing engineering students between 1990 and 1996: An Australian case study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(6), 486–492.
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2011). Higher education standards framework (threshold standards). Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012L00003/Download
Thomas, M., Klymchuk, S., Hong, Y. Y., Kerr, S., McHardy, A., Murphy, P., et al. (2010). The transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9262SummaryReport.pdf
Wood, L., Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2012). Becoming a mathematician. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murphy, P.E.L. (2017). Student Approaches to Learning, Conceptions of Mathematics, and Successful Outcomes in Learning Mathematics. In: Wood, L., Breyer, Y. (eds) Success in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2791-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2791-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2789-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2791-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)