Skip to main content

A Student-Staff Community of Practice Within an Inter-University Final-Year Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education

Abstract

In Australia, final year Bachelor of Engineering students complete an engineering research project. A small number of students (often between four and ten at any one university) elect topics in the field of engineering education. Relative to research in technical engineering, the insulated status of engineering education research can leave these students feeling isolated from other final year engineering students and faculty members. In 2013, we saw an opportunity to engage final year students and academics from two universities in a project to enhance industry engagement in engineering education. We established a research group of nine students and supervisors across the two universities. Each week the group met on campus and joined peers at the other university via a free Internet telephony service. Drawing on the reflections of community members, this chapter reports on the learning community that emerged within this project and the features that supported it. Critical to the community’s success were the regular meetings, the shared knowledge domain of engineering education, the commitment, diversity and quality of team-members, and engagement with the wider faculty and engineering education communities. Students and supervisors learned from and with each other and generated knowledge about the topic, collaboration, disciplines, research and themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D., Male, S., & Maynard, N. (2013). Experiences of an Inter-University Final Year Research Group in Engineering Education. Paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the australasian association for engineering education, Gold Coast, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, D., Kaplan, S., & Suter, V. (2005). Community of practice design guide: A step-by-step guide for designing and cultivating communities of practice in higher education. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/NLI0531.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2015.

  • Collins, A. (1995). Learning communities. Paper presented at the annual conference for the American educational research association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2013). Australian qualification framework. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.aqf.edu.au/

  • Crede, E., & Borrego, M. (2012). Learning in graduate engineering research groups of various sizes. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 565–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, NY: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Florman, S. (1997). Non-technical studies for engineers: The challenge of relevance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. (1995). Rich environments for active learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for educational communications and technology (pp. 665–692). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, J. E. (2003). The Culture of engineering education and its interaction with gender: a case study of a New Zealand university. PhD thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Australia. http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20040105.130533/

  • Hacker, S. (1981). The culture of engineering: Woman, workplace and machine. Women, Technology and Innovation, 4(3), 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L., Pithouse-Morgan, K., Conolly, J., & Meyiwa, T. (2012). Learning from first year of the transformative education/al studies (TES) project. Alternation, 19(2), 12–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P., & Yorke, M. (2004). Learning, curriculum and employability in higher education. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, J., Hadgraft, R., & Rasul, M. (2014). Final year engineering projects: Improving assessment, curriculum and supervision to meet AQF8 outcomes. Paper presented at the 25th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, E. L., & Everest, K. (2001), Using communities of practice to manage intellectual capital, Ivey Business Journal, March/April. http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/view_article.asp?intArticle_ID=2

  • Lesser, E. L., & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organisational performance. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Male, S. A. (2012). Integrated engineering foundation threshold concept inventory. Sydney: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Male, S. A., Bush, M. B., & Murray, K. (2009). Think engineer, think male? European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(5), 455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Male, S. A., & King, R. (2014a). Best practice guidelines for effective industry engagement in Australian Engineering Degrees. http://www.arneia.edu.au/resource/59

  • Male, S. A., & King, R. (2014b). Improving industry engagement in engineering degrees. Paper presented at the 25th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, L., Brodie, L., Chang, R., & Howard, P. (2011). Engineering education research groups in Australia: Implications for Australasian engineering educators. Paper presented at the Australasian Association for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Fremantle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manto, M. (2003). On the road to community. http://members.ozemail.com.au/~marleman/index.html. Accessed 16 Aug 2015.

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., Hadgraft, R., Stojcevski, A., & Lawson, J. (2014). Supporting students through the final year engineering project experience to achieve AGF8 outcomes. Paper presented at the 25th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (2000). Knowing in community: 10 critical success factors in building communities of practice. http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/knowing.shtml. Accessed 17 Mar 2015.

  • McDonald, J., Collins, P., Hingst, R., Kimmins, L., Lynch, B., & Star, C. (2008). Community learning: Members’ stories about their academic community of practice. In Engaging Communities, Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference (pp. 221–229), Rotorua, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. & Palani, Ari (2011). Building leadership capacity for community of practice facilitators: Edgy professional development. In: K. Krause, M. Buckridge, C. Grimmer. & S. Purbrick-Illek (Eds.), Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping higher education, Proceedings of the 34th HERDSA Annual Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 4–7 July, 2011, (pp. 198–206).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. (1994). Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method. Thousand Oaks: Northwestern University, Pine Forge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreeve, A. (2007). Learning development and study support an embedded approach through communities of practice. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 6(1), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K. (2003, 2009). Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice. The encyclopaedia of informal education. www.infed.org/biblio/communities_of_practice.htm. Accessed 26 June 2015.

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2012). Developing a critical professional identity: Engaging self in practice. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 27–40). London: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, J. P. (2011). Are we accidentally misleading students about engineering practice? In W. Hernandez (Ed.), Research in Engineering Education Symposium (n. p). Madrid: Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice—learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). Springer London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are sincerely thankful to the final year students for selecting the projects and undertaking them with passion, and completing reflections, and the supervisor, Nicoleta Maynard for supporting the group and participating in this study. We thank Diane Costello for receiving consent forms and de-identifying the students’ reflections. We are grateful to Robin King, Lead of the project ‘Enhancing Industry Engagement in Engineering Degrees’, on behalf of the Australian Council of Engineering Deans, for supporting the idea of engaging students. We acknowledge the Australian Government Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education which funded the overarching project and The University of Western Australia for hosting Sally Male to work on the project, and the Office for Learning and Teaching, which supported the Fellowship work of Dawn Bennett: www.thetileapproach.ning.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally A. Male .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bennett, D., Male, S.A. (2017). A Student-Staff Community of Practice Within an Inter-University Final-Year Project. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2865-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2866-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics