Skip to main content

Democratic Innovations, Globalisation and Identity Formation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Madhesi Upsurge and the Contested Idea of Nepal

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Anthropology ((BRIEFSANTHRO))

  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

The new democracies of South Asia, like Nepal, overwhelmed by the idea of advanced democracies of the West, fail to design a democratic model best suited to its sociopolitical structure. Additionally, defining democracy in a relatively divided society has been a challenging task for any emerging democracy especially in terms of accommodating these diversities. In the process of defining democracy which holds the diversity together, the state automatically becomes hegemonic However, at the same time, this model provides a space for these diversities to retaliate with the state. This chapter elaborates on the process of democratisation vis-à-vis globalisation of Nepal and its relation to the ethnic turmoil in Madhes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baylis, J., Owens, P., & Smith, S. (2008). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baqai, H. (2005). Democratic deficit in South Asia. Pakistan Horizon, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, A. H. (1993). The concepts and theories of modern democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R., & Laitin, D. D. (1998). Ethnic and nationalist violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 423–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010). The power of identity. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaterjee, P. (1986). Natioanlist world and the colonial thought: A derivative discourse. Tokyo: Zed Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (1990). Land rights and ethnic conflict in Nepal. Economic Political Weekly, 1318–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2010). Can foreign aid buy growth? Retrieved June 13, 2014, from http://williameasterly.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/40_easterly_canforeignaidbuygrowth_prp.pdf.

  • Gaige, F. H. (2009). Regionalism and national unity in Nepal. Kathmandu: Social Science Baha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2000). Bulding democracies in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 1071–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. (1995). Nation-state, international regulation and the question of democracy. Review of International Political Economy, 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). Clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, R. (1988). State against democracy: In search of humane governance. Delhi: Ajanta Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, R. (2007). Rethinking democracy. New Delhi: Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladejinsky, W. (1964). Agrarian reform in Asia. Council on Foreign Relaltions, 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mage, J. (2007). The Nepali Revolution and International Relations. Economic and Political Weekly, 1834–1839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda, E. R. (2010). States in conflict with their minorities. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marie, S. N. (2008). Globalization discontent: The effects of globalization on ethnic protests. Peace Economics: Peace Science and Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niezen, R. (2003). The origin of indigenism: Human-rights and the politics of identity. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olzak, S. (2010). Does globalization breed ethnic discontent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phandis, U., & Ganguly, R. (2001). Ethnicity and nation building in South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani, G. (2012). Identity-politics in the global age. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Hand book of identity studies (pp. 380–396). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambiah, S. J. (1989). Ethnic conflict in the world today (pp. 335–349). American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalpana Jha .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jha, K. (2017). Democratic Innovations, Globalisation and Identity Formation. In: The Madhesi Upsurge and the Contested Idea of Nepal. SpringerBriefs in Anthropology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2926-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics