Abstract
Indian policymakers are now centrally concerned with the future of manufacturing as the basis for economic development, prosperity and rising living standards. The automotive industry is pivotal to this transformation. All global carmakers now have major investments in India, often operating alongside major Indian transnational corporations. Key automotive clusters are in the National Capital Region, the Chennai Metropolitan Region and the “Chakan corridor” near the city of Pune, as well as emerging clusters and production facilities in several other parts of the country. Much of the optimism about the auto industry flows from its historically transformative role in Western Europe, the USA and Japan where it sets standards in quality manufacturing, technology, wages and employment relations. Understandably, some have predicted that the expansion of auto production in India should lead to similar “high road” labour relations, based on high wages, long-term employment contracts, stable career paths, social protection and enterprise-based benefits. But the evidence suggests otherwise. The Indian auto industry has instead reproduced “low road” employment relations based upon high wage inequality and employment relations that are over-reliant upon labour contractors. Serious industrial conflict has been common. Given the global developmental promise of the auto industry, why has this happened? Critiquing the global production networks framework from an uneven and combined development perspective, this chapter argues that the answer lies in a combination of India’s distinctive national and regional norms, social relations and institutions with the global carmakers’ governance practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahn, P. S. (Ed.). (2007). Organizing for decent work in the informal economy: Strategies, methods and practices. New Delhi: ILO.
Awasthi, D., Pal, S., & Yagnik, J. (2010). Small producers and labour conditions in auto parts and components industry in North India. In A. Posthuma & D. Nathan (Eds.), Labour in global production networks in India (pp. 272–299). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Babson, S. (1986). Working Detroit: The making of a union town. Detroit, MI: WSU Press.
Barnes, T. (2015). Informal labour in urban India: Three cities, three journeys. London: Routledge.
Barnes, T., Lal Das, K. S., & Pratap, S. (2015). Labour contractors and global production networks: The case of India’s auto supply chain. Journal of Development Studies, 51(4), 355–369.
Basile, E. (2013). Capitalist development in India’s informal economy. Oxford: Routledge.
Becker-Ritterspach, F. (2007, June). Maruti Suzuki’s trajectory: From a public sector enterprise to a Japanese-owned subsidiary. Paper Presented at the 15th GERPISA International Colloquium. Paris.
Becker-Ritterspach, F. (2009). Hybridization of MNE subsidiaries: The automotive sector in India. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bose, A. J. C., & Pratap, S. (2012). Worker voices in an auto production chain: Notes from the pits of a low road—Part 1. Economic and Political Weekly, 47, 46–59.
Breman, J. (1996). Footloose labour: Working in India’s informal economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coe, N. M., & Hess, M. (2013). Global production networks, labour and development. Geoforum, 44, 4–9.
Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). ‘Globalizing’ regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the British Institute of Geographers, 29(4), 468–484.
Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. (2015). Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
D’Costa, A. P. (2014). Compressed capitalism and development. Critical Asian Studies, 46(2), 317–344.
Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewicz, M. (1994). Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12, 78–104.
Gopalakrishnan, R., & Mirer, J. (2014). Shiny cars, shattered dreams. International Commission for Labour Rights (ICLR). New York. Retrieved December 19, 2014, from http://www.laborcommission.org/files/uploads/2Shattered_Dreams_FINAL_website.pdf.
Government of India. (2006). Automotive mission plan, 2006–2016: A mission for development of Indian automotive industry. New Delhi: Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises.
Government of India. (2016). Automotive mission plan, 2016–2026. New Delhi: Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, Society of Indian Automotive Manufacturers.
Gulyani, S. (2001). Innovating with infrastructure: The automobile industry in India. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Gurgaon Workers News. (2016). (various). Retrieved March 1, 2016, from https://gurgaonworkersnews.wordpress.com/.
Hall, A. P., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hammer, A. (2010). Trade unions in a constrained environment: Workers’ voices from a new industrial zone in India. Industrial Relations Journal, 41(2), 168–184.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, E. (2009). The Indian industrial relations system: Struggling to address the dynamics of a globalizing economy. Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(3), 395–410.
Jha, P., & Chakraborty, A. (2012, July 6–8). Global production networks and labour process: A study of the Gurgaon-Manesar automobile cluster, India. Paper Presented at International Workshop on New Spatialities and Labour, IGIDR, Mumbai.
Lakhani, T., Kuruvilla, S., & Avgar, A. (2013). From the firm to the network: Global value chains and employment relations theory. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51, 440–472.
Lal Das, K. S., & George, S. (2006). Labour practices and working conditions in TNCs: The case of Toyota Kirloskar in India. In D. Chang (Ed.), Labour in globalizing Asian corporations: A picture of struggle (pp. 273–302). Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Resource Centre.
Mazumdar, S. (2010). Indian capitalism: A case that doesn’t fit?. Research Paper Institute for Studies in Industrial Development. New Delhi. Retrieved December 10, 2013, from http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/28162/1/MPRA_paper_28162.pdf.
Monaco, L. (2014). Industrial policy and the auto sector in India: Developments and challenges ahead. L’Industria, 35(3), 461–488.
Narayanan, B. G., & Vashisht. (2008). Determinants of the competitiveness of the Indian auto industry (Working Paper 201). New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations/ICRIER.
OICA (Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d’Automobiles). (2015). Production statistics. Retrieved from http://oica.net/category/production-statistics/.
Pratap, S., & Bose, A. J. C. (2016). Informality and precarious work in production chain capitalism: A case study of automobile industry in India. Asian Labour Review, 1, 67–100.
Rainnie, A., Herod, A., & McGrath-Champ, S. (2013). Global production networks, labour and small firms. Capital and Class, 37(2), 177–195.
Sako, M. (1992). Price, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saleem, S. Z. (2015, October 23). After Maruti Suzuki; Honda Motorcycle, Hero MotoCorp negotiate wage pact. Financial Express. Retrieved March 1, 2015, from http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/companies/hmsi-hero-negotiate-wage-pact/155394/.
Selwyn, B. (2012). Beyond firm-centrism: Re-intregrating labour and capitalism into global commodity chain analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 205–226.
Shyam Sundar, K. R. (2005). State in industrial relations system in India: From corporatist to neoliberal? Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 48(4), 917–937.
Shyam Sundar, K. R. (2012). Contract labour in India: Issues and perspectives. New Delhi: Daanish Books.
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
Sturgeon, T., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Gereffi, G. (2008). Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 297–321.
Sugrue, T. J. (2005). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in post-war Detroit (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Suresh, T. G. (2010). Cost-cutting pressures and labour relations in Tamil Nadu’s automobile components supply chain. In A. Posthuma & D. Nathan (Eds.), Labour in global production networks in India (pp. 251–271). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: Scribner.
UNCTAD. (2013). World investment report: Global value chains—Investment for trade and development. Geneva: United Nations.
Yadav, A. (2015, December 14). Workers’ problems: The more things change at Maruti’s Manesar plant, the more they stay the same. Retrieved March 1, 2016, from http://scroll.in/article/773241/workers-problems-the-more-things-change-at-marutis-manesar-plant-the-more-they-stay-the-same[accessed.
Yeung, H. W., & Coe, N. M. (2015). Towards a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29–58.
Zhang, L. (2015). Inside China’s automobile factories: The politics of labour and worker resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnes, T. (2017). Why Has the Indian Automotive Industry Reproduced “Low Road” Labour Relations?. In: Noronha, E., D'Cruz, P. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Work and Employment in Globalizing India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3491-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3491-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3490-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3491-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)