Abstract
Land and forest resources have been at the centre of several policy interventions in India over a long period of time: policy declarations, acts and rules as well as incentivising and restraining tax and subsidy structures. Field reality observed by social scientists and their natural science counterparts has also been documented extensively in the last three to four decades. The questions we ask in this chapter are: Has the policy direction been impacted by the understandings from this literature? What is the empirical learning policy link? Who are the stakeholders who count?
We find that the legacy consisted of a focus on privately owned land and forests, to the utter neglect of common land. These resources were seen, in the main, as ‘for development’. An alternative, though partial, understanding of land- and water-based ecosystems led to some initiatives (such as watershed development and joint forest management) in the 1990s, haltingly and inefficiently implemented. This in turn gave the judiciary an overwhelming role. Similarly, a rights-based initiative got cognizance in the form of the Forests Rights Act, soon to be pushed to the background by the focus on ‘development’. In the context of land and forests, there continued and continues a constant to and fro between wise use and mindless extraction, with some stakeholders inevitably privileged due to the prevalent unequal distribution of knowledge, income and power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Lele and Menon (2014) pp. 4–5.
- 2.
- 3.
See Chapter 2 of Chopra et al. (1990) for estimates.
- 4.
- 5.
Several studies during that period documented this.
- 6.
See the study by Upadhyaya et al. (2006) for details of rights, privileges and concessions in the state of Himachal Pradesh.
- 7.
Chatterjee, among others, (1996) documents the factors involved in the Arabari experiment in West Bengal.
- 8.
- 9.
See Government of India (2004).
- 10.
See Lele and Menon (2014) who wish foresters and policymakers to look beyond JFM, Godavarman and tigers as the three focal points of forest policy.
- 11.
See Rosencranz et al. (2007) for an in-depth analysis.
- 12.
See the discussion in Khanna (2014), in particular relating to controversies over ‘orange areas’ in Madhya Pradesh and certain areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act (1900).
- 13.
See Chopra et al. (2006) for details of the recommendations.
- 14.
Some commentators claimed that the short-run benefits offered by JFM do not act as additional incentives as they are no different from traditional rights which some communities enjoyed under ‘nistar’.
- 15.
- 16.
For details see Baviskar in Chopra and Rao edited (2008).
- 17.
See Brock and Carpenter (2007) PNAS.
- 18.
For more details on the two Western Ghats committees, see Chapter 4, Section VII Expert Committees, Political Economy and Policy Making: The Western Ghats case. See also Chopra (2014).
- 19.
See Chopra (2011) for a more detailed discussion.
References
Agarwal A (1998) When leaders deliver: power from the people. Down to Earth, December 31 and The Hindu, October 1998
Agarwal A, Narain S, Sen S (1999) State of India’s environment, The fifth citizen’s report. Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi
Baviskar A (2008) The dream machine: the model development project and the remaking of the state. In: Chopra K, Rao C, Hanumantha H (eds) Growth, equity, environment and population: economic and sociological perspectives. Sage Publications, New Delhi
Brock WA, Carpenter SR (2007) Panaceas and diversification of environmental policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15206–15211
Chatterjee AP (1996) Community forest management in Arabari: understanding socio-cultural and subsistence issues. Society for the Promotion of wastelands Development, New Delhi
Chopra K (2011) Managing transformational change: guiding principles from a systems’ perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, January 15–22, 2011
Chopra K (2014) Conservation and development in the Western Ghats a tale of two committees and more. Econ Polit Wkly XLIX(11):12–14
Chopra K (2016) Price and non-price reforms in Indian agriculture: a re-examination and some reflections. In: Indian Society of Agricultural Economics (ed) Indian agricultural economy under liberalised regime, vol 3. Academic Foundation, New Delhi
Chopra K, Kadekodi GK, Murty MN (1990) Participatory development: people and common property resources. Sage Publications, New Delhi
Chopra K, Kadekodi GK, Eswaran VB (2006) Report of the Expert Committee on Net Present Value, submitted to the Supreme Court of India
Colander D, Kupers R (2014) Complexity and the art of public policy: solving society’s problems from the bottom up. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford
Government of India (1992) Guidelines for watershed development
Government of India (2004) Handbook of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Rules(Conservation), 2003, Guidelines and Clarifications(up to June 2004). MOEF, New Delhi
Jodha NS (1986) Common property resources and the rural poor in the dry regions of India. Econ Polit Wkly XXX(27):1169–1181
Khanna S (2014) The Godavarman case and beyond. In: Lele S, Menon A (eds) Democratising forest governance in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Lele S, Menon A (eds) (2014) Democratising forest governance in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Ostrom E (2009) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems Nobel Prize lecture, Stockholm
Rao CHH (2000) Watershed development in India: recent experience and emerging issues. Econ Polit Wkly XXXV(45):3943–3947
Rosencranz A, Boenig E, Dutta B (2007) The Godavarman case: the Indian Supreme Court’s breach of constitutional boundaries in managing India’s forests. ELR News Anal 37(1):10032–10042
Sen A (2016) Introduction. In: Indian Society of Agricultural Economics (ed) Indian agricultural economy under liberalised regime, vol 3. Academic Foundation, New Delhi
Shah A (2014) Natural resources and chronic poverty in India: interface and policy imperatives. In: Barrett S, Maler K-G, Maskin ES (eds) Environmental and development economics: essays in honor of Partha Dasgupta. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Upadhyaya S et al (2006) “Estimating the economic value of forest land: a methodology: the legal perspective” report submitted to the Supreme Court Committee on NPV of Forest Land
Verma M et al (2014) Revision of rates of NPV applicable for different classes/categories of forests. Centre for Ecological Services Management, Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chopra, K. (2017). Land and Forest Policy: Resources for Development or Our Natural Resources?. In: Development and Environmental Policy in India. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3761-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3761-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3760-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3761-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)