Skip to main content

Embracing Customers’ Diverse Needs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Competitive Advantage of Customer Centricity

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 3526 Accesses

Abstract

In today’s turbulent marketplace, nothing is more important, difficult or perilous than keeping customers happy. Most companies measure customer satisfaction, implement quality improvements, and take steps to improve after-sales service. Although these measures would seem to make a company more customer-focused, in fact they are attempts to become more market-focused. Companies that focus on the market try to make products that appeal to a broad audience rather than meet specific needs of individuals or a small group of customers. Today it is imperative that companies meet increasingly diverse customer needs at the lowest possible costs. But this has become increasingly difficult to do without sacrificing one for the other and ending up stuck in the middle. The problem is that mass-produced standardized goods cost less, while customized products are more expensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pine, J.B. (1993), Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  2. 2.

    Haeckel, S. H. (1999), Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-and-Respond Organizations, Harvard Business School Press.

  3. 3.

    Child, P., Diederichs, R., Sanders, F. H. and Wisiniowski, S. (1991), “The management of complexity,” Sloan Management Review, 33 (1).

  4. 4.

    Child P., Diederichs R., Sanders F. H., and Wisiniowski S., “The management of complexity”, Sloan Management Review, 33 (1), 1991.

  5. 5.

    Mark Gottfredson and Keith Aspinall, Innovation and Complexity, Harvard Business Review, November, 2005.

  6. 6.

    Stephan H. Haeckel, “Peripheral Vision: Sensing and acting on weak signals making meaning out of apparent noise: The need for a new managerial framework”, Long Range Planning 37, 2004.

  7. 7.

    Hau L. Lee, The triple-A Supply Chain, Harvard Business Review, October 2004.

  8. 8.

    James M. Reeves and Mandyam M. Srinivasan, “Which Supply Chain Design is Right for You?” Supply Chain Management Review May/June 2005.

  9. 9.

    Smock, D. D., Rudzki, R. A., and Rogers, S. C. (2007), “Sourcing Strategy-The Brains Behind the Game,” Supply Chain Management Review, May/June.

  10. 10.

    Aviv, Y. and Federgruen, A. (2001), “Design for Postponement: A Comprehensive Characterization of Its Benefits under Unknown Demand Distributions,” Operations Research, Vol. 49, No. 4, July–August.

  11. 11.

    Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., and Cooper, M. B. (2002), Supply Chain Logistics Management, McGraw Hill.

  12. 12.

    Edward Feitzinger and Hua L. Lee, “Mass Customization at Hewlett-Packard: The Power of Postponement”, Harvard Business Review, January–February 1997.

  13. 13.

    Jan W. Rivkin and Michael E. Porter, Matching Dell, Harvard Business School case, 1999.

  14. 14.

    Lee, H. L. and Billington, C. (1994), Design Products and Process for Postponement in Management of Design: Engineering and Management Perspective, S. Dasu and C. Eastmand, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston.

  15. 15.

    Lee, H. L., Billington, C., and Carter, B. (1993), “Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service through Design for Localization,” Interfaces. 23: 4, July/August.

  16. 16.

    Feitzinger, E. and Lee, H.L. (1997), Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: the power of postponement, Harvard Business Review, 75 (1), 116–21.

  17. 17.

    Lee, H.L. and Sasser, M. (1995), Product universality and design for supply chain management, International journal of production planning and control, Special issue on supply chain management, 6(3), 270–77.

  18. 18.

    Krikke, H., Ieke le Blanc, and Steef van de Velde. (2004), “Product Modularity and the Design of Closed-Loop Supply Chain,” California Management Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, Winter.

  19. 19.

    Lee, H. (1996) “Design for supply chain management: concept and example.” Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Stanford University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parniangtong, S. (2017). Embracing Customers’ Diverse Needs. In: Competitive Advantage of Customer Centricity. Management for Professionals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4442-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics