Skip to main content

Anthropomorphic Televisions Are More Attractive: The Effect of Novelty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ergonomics in Caring for People

Abstract

Literature suggests that anthropomorphic (humanlike) shapes in product appearance may be fruitful to design a product. However, anthropomorphism may have either positive or negative consequence in market. Novelty is an aesthetic dimension which may cause acceptance of an anthropomorphic product in market, due to attractiveness of the product. The present study was conducted to investigate whether anthropomorphic product appearance causes a high level of perceived novelty; thus, the higher level of perceived attractiveness and product choice. Results of the present study revealed that users perceived a higher level of novelty in product due to a higher level of anthropomorphism. It was also evident that users perceived the product as more attractive which had a higher level of novelty in appearance. Eyetracking study indicated that average fixation counts and fixation durations were higher in the case of television which had a higher level of novelty. Further, people choose the product (television) which had a higher level of novelty and attractiveness. Hence, novelty is the basis of making anthropomorphic product attractive and anthropomorphic product choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schoormans JPL, Robben HSJ (1997) The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. J Econ Psychol 18(2–3):271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mugge R, Dahl DW (2013) Seeking the ideal level of design newness: consumer response to radical and incremental product design. J Prod Innov Manage 30(S1):34–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mugge R, Schoormans JP (2012) Product design and apparent usability. The influence of novelty in product appearance. Appl Ergon 43(6):1081–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aggarwal P, McGill AL (2007) Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. J Consum Res 34(4):468–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2005) The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J Prod Innov Manage 22:63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duchowski AT (2007) Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiesler T (2006) Anthropomorphism and consumer behavior. Adv Consum Res 33:149

    Google Scholar 

  8. Windhager S, Slice DE, Schaefer K et al (2008) Face to face: the perception of automotive designs. Hum Nat Int Bios 19(4):331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Windhager S, Hutzler F, Carbon CC et al (2010) Laying eyes on headlights: eye movements suggest facial features in cars. Coll Antropol 43(3):1075–1080

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maughan L, Gutnikov S, Stevens R (2007) Like more, look more. Look more, like more: the evidence from eye-tracking. J Brand Manage 14(4):335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Dahl DW (2009) The role of imagination-focused visualization on new product evaluation. J Mark Res 46:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hekkert P, Snelders D, VanWieringen PCW (2003) ‘Most advanced, yet acceptable’: typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. Br J Psychol 94:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Page C, Herr PM (2002) An investigation of the processes by which product design and brand strength interact to determine initial affect and quality judgments. J Consum Psychol 12:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miesler L, Leder H, Herrmann A (2011) Isn’t it cute: an evolutionary perspective of baby-schema effects in visual product designs. Int J Des 5(3):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clement J (2007) Visual influence on in-store buying decisions: an eye-track experiment on the visual influence of packaging design. J Mark Manage 23(9–10):917–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sougata Karmakar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chowdhury, A., Chakrabarti, D., Karmakar, S. (2018). Anthropomorphic Televisions Are More Attractive: The Effect of Novelty. In: Ray, G., Iqbal, R., Ganguli, A., Khanzode, V. (eds) Ergonomics in Caring for People. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4980-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4980-4_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4979-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4980-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics