Abstract
This chapter argues that South Africa today cannot be considered a sub-imperialist state, despite its economic weight in Africa and Southern Africa, in particular. The question is how South Africa’s relationship with Northern states and its African neighbours is changing in its reorientation to the East. The chapter discusses the different theoretical conceptions applied to South Africa, before assessing South Africa’s historical and current power across the region and continent, empirically and historically. It is argued that South Africa has undergone transformations that are distinct from other semi-peripheral states. Furthermore, it is argued that the declining importance of the North and the creation of new networks of accumulation orienting the region and South Africa towards the East present new tendencies and conceptual anomalies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is not clear who makes the argument that the BRICS are ‘anti-imperialist’. Bond names five authors, including this author, but they seem a phantom target: as far as can be ascertained, none of the five authors use the term as cited by Bond (2015: 15). What is common is the argument, as Escobar (2013) notes in the article by him that Bond cites, is that the BRICS are unexpectedly powerful (‘for the first time in 150 years, the combined output of the developing world’s three leading economies—Brazil, China and India—is about equal to the combined GDP of the long-standing industrial powers of the North’) and this is leading the BRICS to ‘not only deploy their economic clout but also take concrete steps leading towards a multipolar world’. None of this means they are ‘anti-capitalist’ or ‘anti-imperialist’, and to ignore these shifts leads to analytical and political missteps, as we argue below.
- 2.
‘Imperialist wars are absolutely inevitable’ (Lenin 1970: 674); and ‘[t]he struggle among the world imperialisms is becoming more acute […] what means other than war could there be under capitalism to overcome the disparity between the development of the productive forces and the accumulation of capital on the one side, and the division of colonies and spheres of influence for finance capital on the other?’ (ibid: 744–745, emphasis in original).
- 3.
In more recent work Bond (2012) has more carefully constructed the historical growth of South African financial institutions and speculative excesses.
- 4.
While capital accumulation can be carefully delineated following Marx’s M-C-M sequences, it is often very hard to define what constitutes primitive accumulation. ‘Accumulation by dispossession’, as Harvey coins it, covers an exceedingly wide range of phenomena outside of the processes of capital accumulation proper. As Harvey (2003: 153) says: ‘A close look at Marx’s description of primitive accumulation reveals a wide range of processes: the commoditization and privatization of land and the forceful expulsion of peasant populations; the conversion of various forms of property rights (common, collective, state, etc.) into exclusive private property rights; the suppression of rights to the commons; the commodification of labour power and the suppression of alternative (indigenous) forms of production and consumption; colonial, neo-colonial and imperial processes of appropriation of assets (including natural resources); the monetization of exchange and taxation, particularly of land; the slave trade; and usury, the national debt, and ultimately the credit system as radical means of primitive accumulation’. To these, one then adds today’s myriad forms associated with structural adjustment, land grabs, commodity booms, and neoliberalism generally.
- 5.
For the counter case, see Foster (2002).
- 6.
International agencies and South African government reports often lag considerably in catching the transition of multinational firms from South African to British or US (e.g. Anglo-American to AAC, South African Breweries to SAB), rendering data surveys questionable. See the data and comments in Verhoef (2011).
- 7.
Estimates of South Africa’s FDI in the rest of Africa vary quite widely among those who use project-based data versus those who rely on official capital flow data, e.g. between researchers (the Human Science Research Council, Business Map, South African Institute of International Affairs) and the South African Reserve Bank and international agencies such as UNCTAD. For the range of data, see Wolfgang (2006: 17–19), and for related problems with Chinese FDI, Kaplinsky and Morris (2009).
References
Africa-Asia Confidential. (2012). South Africa looks East. https://www.africa-asia-confidential.com/article/id/763/South_Africa_looks_east.
Alden, C., & Le Pere, G. (2009). South Africa in Africa: Bound to lead? Politikon, 36(1), 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340903155443.
Alden, C., & Schoeman, M. (2015). South Africa’s symbolic hegemony in Africa. International Politics, 52(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.47.
Andreasson, S. (2011). Africa’s prospects and South Africa’s leadership potential in the emerging markets century. Third World Quarterly, 32(6), 1165–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.584725.
Arrighi, G. (1983). The geometry of imperialism: The limits of Hobson’s paradigm. London: Verso Books.
Arrighi, G., Aschoff, N., & Scully, B. (2010). Accumulation by dispossession and its limits: The Southern Africa paradigm revisited. Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID), 45(4), 410–438.
Ashman, S., Fine, B., & Newman, S. (2011). Amnesty international? The nature, scale and impact of capital flight from South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 37(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2011.555155.
Baran, P. A., & Sweezy, P. M. (1966). Monopoly capital: An essay on the American economic and social order. New York: Monthly Review.
Bond, P. (2000). Elite transition: From apartheid to neoliberalism in South Africa. London: Pluto Press.
Bond, P. (2004). The ANC’s ‘Left Turn’ & South African sub-imperialism. Review of African Political Economy, 31(102), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305624042000327778.
Bond, P. (2006). Looting Africa: The economics of exploitation. New York: Zed Books.
Bond, P. (2012). Financialization, corporate power, and South African subimperialism. In R. Cox (Ed.), Corporate power and globalization in US Foreign policy (pp. 114–132). London: Routledge.
Bond, P. (2014). BRICS and the tendency to sub-imperialism. Pambazuka News, 10. http://www.pambazuka.org/governance/brics-and-tendency-sub-imperialism.
Bond, P. (2015). BRICS and the sub-imperial location. In P. Bond & A. Garcia (Eds.), BRICS an anti-capitalist critique (pp. 15–26). Chicago: Haymarket.
Broadman, H. G. (2007). Africa’s silk road: China and India’s new economic frontier. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Burke, C., & Corkin, L. (2006). China’s interest and activity in Africa’s construction and infrastructure sectors. Stellenbosch, South Africa: Centre for Chinese Studies, University of Stellenbosch.
Buthelezi, S. (2003). S.A.’s Role in Africa’s economic recovery. New Agenda, 9.
Cassim, R., Onyango, D., & Van Seventer, D. E. (2002). The state of trade policy in South Africa. TIPS. www.tips.org.za/research/papers/getpaper.asp?id=501.
Davies, R. (2001). Regional integration. In Regional integration in Southern Africa: Comparative international perspectives (pp 51–53). Johannesburg: SAIIA.
Economist. (2006). China in Africa never too late to scramble. http://www.economist.com/world/mideast-africa/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_RDRJSTJ.
Economist. (2008). A ravenous dragon: A special report on China’s quest for resources.
Escobar, P. (2013). Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa: BRICS go over the Wall. Asia Times. http://www.globalresearch.ca/brics-go-over-the-wall/5328662.
Evans, P. B. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Fabricious, P. (2013). Will SA’s new pals be so different from the West? The Star, 8 March, https://www.iol.co.za/the-star/will-sa-s-new-pals-be-so-different-from-the-west-1.1483040#.UVRTwTfJJSk.
Flynn, M. (2007). Between subimperialism and globalization: A case study in the internationalization of Brazilian capital. Latin American Perspectives, 34(6), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X07308113.
Foster, J. B. (2002). Monopoly capital and the new globalization. Monthly Review, 53(8), 1–16.
Gelb, S. (2006). Business Day. www.businessday.co.za/articles/topstories.aspx?ID=BD4A213580.
Hall, R. (2011). Land grabbing in Southern Africa: The many faces of the investor rush. Review of African Political Economy, 38(128), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2011.582753.
Hall, R. (2012). The next Great Trek? South African commercial farmers move North. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.677037.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hawk, T. (2008). The wrong kinds of inflows. Financial Times, 3.
Hirschman, A. O. (1980). National power and the structure of foreign trade. Berkeley [usw.]: University of California Press.
Illovo Sugar Ltd. (2012). Integrated Annual Report 2012. Illovo Sugar Ltd.
Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2009). Chinese FDI in Sub-Saharan Africa: Engaging with large dragons. European Journal of Development Research, 21(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.24.
Lenin, V. I. (1970). Imperialism: The highest stage of capitalism. In Selected works in three volumes (Vol. 1, pp. 666–768). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lesufi, I. (2004). South Africa and the rest of the continent: Towards a critique of the political economy of NEPAD. Current Sociology, 52(5), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104045372.
Lesufi, I. (2006). Nepad and South African imperialism. Johannesburg: Jubilee South Africa.
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Marini, R. M. (1965). Brazilian ‘interdependence’ and imperialist integration. Monthly Review, 17(7), 10–29.
Marini, R. M. (1972). Brazilian sub-imperialism. Monthly Review, 23(9), 14–24.
Martin, W. G. (2013a). Living in a theoretical interregnum: Capital lessons from Southern African rural history. In F. Hendricks (Ed.), The promise of land: Undoing a century of dispossession in South Africa (pp. 159–184). Auckland Park, South Africa: Jacana.
Martin, W. G. (2013b). South Africa and the world-economy: Remaking race, state, region. Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press.
Miller, D. (2004). South African multinational corporations, NEPAD, and competing regional cliaims in post-apartheid Southern Africa. African Sociological Review, 8(1), 176.
Miller, D. (2006). ‘Spaces of resistance’—African Workers at Shoprite in Mauto and Lusaka. Africa Development, 31(1), 27–49.
Moyo, S., Yeros, P., & Jha, P. (2012). Imperialism and primitive accumulation: Notes on the new scramble for Africa. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 1(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/227797601200100203.
MTN. (2012). MTN global footprint. www.mtn.com/MTNGROUP/Pages/CompanyProfile.aspx.
MTN. (2015). MTN Group Limited. Company Profile 2015. https://www.mtn.com/MTNGROUP/Documents/Profile2015/index.html.
OECD. (2015). Sugar. In OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2015, by OECD and FAO. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2015/sugar_agr_outlook-2015-9-en.
Richardson, B. (2010). Big sugar in Southern Africa: Rural development and the perverted potential of sugar/ethanol exports. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 917–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.512464.
Samson, M. (2009). (Sub)imperial South Africa? Reframing the Debate1. Review of African Political Economy, 36(119), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240902888774.
Shaw, T., Cooper, A., & Chin, G. (2009). Emerging powers and africa: Implications for/from global governance? Politikon, 36(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340903155385.
Shoprite. (2012). Corporate holdings. www.shopriteholdings.co.za/pages/1019812640/about-our-company/history.asp.
South Africa. Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries. (2012). Abstract of agricultural statistics 2012. Pretoria: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
South Africa. Department of Trade and Industry. (2010). South African trade statistics. www.thedti.gov.za/econdb/raportt/rapmenu1.html#13.
South African Reserve Bank. (2006). Quarterly bulletin. www.resbank.co.za/Publications/QuarterlyBulletins/Pages/QuarterlyBulletins-Home.aspx.
South African Reserve Bank. (2010). Quarterly bulletin. www.resbank.co.za/Publications/QuarterlyBulletins/Pages/QuarterlyBulletins-Home.aspx.
Taylor, I. (2011). South African ‘imperialism’ in a region lacking regionalism: A critique. Third World Quarterly, 32(7), 1233–1253. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.596743.
Tongaat Hulett Sugar. (2012). Integrated annual report 2012. Tongaat (South Africa): Tongaat Hulett Sugar.
United Nations (1948). Statistical Yearbook. Lake Success, NY: United Nations.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2011). Web Table 28. Inward FDI performance and potential index rankings. In World investment report 2011. Non-equity modes of international production and development. New York: United Nations. http://unctad.org/Sections/dite_dir/docs/WIR11_web%20tab%2028.pdf.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2016). Global investment trends monitor. United Nations. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaeia2016d1_en.pdf.
Verhoef, G. (2011). The globalisation of South African conglomerates, 1990–2009. Economic History of Developing Regions, 26(2), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2011.625242.
Walt, V. (2006). China’s Africa Safari. Fortune. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/02/20/8369164/index.htm.
Wolfgang, T. (2006). South Africa’s foreign direct investment in Africa: Catalytic kingpin in the NEPAD process. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.
World Bank. (1994). World Tables. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
World Bank. World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martin, W.G. (2019). South Africa and the New Scramble: The Demise of Sub-imperialism and the Rise of the East. In: Moyo, S., Jha, P., Yeros, P. (eds) Reclaiming Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5840-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5840-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5839-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5840-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)