Skip to main content

The Expected, Evaluated, Perceived, Valued and Prevalent Social Roles of Older People: Are They by Consent?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Evidence for Active Ageing Policies

Abstract

This chapter uses the Active Ageing Index (AAI) as an “operationalisation” of the active ageing paradigm and compares it with the perceived roles and contributions of older people and older peoples’ own preferences and prevalent role sets. The active ageing concept highlights productive roles such as worker, volunteer and care provider. However, the surveys show that older people are socially recognised primarily for their contributions as grandparents and providers of support for families. If the preferences of older people themselves are considered, the roles of grandparent, partner, friend and parent are attributed the highest value. The survey “Life roles (2014)” has shown that friend, parent, sibling and partner are the most prevalent roles. The discussion calls for strengthening the weight of the family roles within the AAI.

Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the Czech Scientific Agency under Grant number P404/13-34958S. “Role overload: Grandparenting in the Era of Active Ageing”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1062&langId=en

  2. 2.

    That is, the average answer on a 1- to 4-point scale, where 1 represented “very concerned” and 4 “not at all”, obtained in these countries was above 3 points; however, it was still less than 3.5 points; the overall average was 2.7 points; the average value of the indicator in the “very concerned” countries was around 2.3 points (author’s own calculations).

  3. 3.

    Source: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1062&langId=en

  4. 4.

    Cf. National Strategic Policy for Active Ageing in Malta (online). Available from: https://activeageing.gov.mt/en/Pages/NSPAA.aspx (cit. 23 January 2015); or National Action Plan for Positive Ageing in the Czech Republic. Available from: http://www.mpsv.cz/files/clanky/22733/NAP_2013_2017.pdf

  5. 5.

    For example, lifelong learning = (10 p. indicator weight × 10 p. domain weight) = 100 points/(9825 sum of all points for all domains/100) = 1%. Other topics include grandparenting 9%; caring 9%; leisure 5%; environment 3%; finances 3%; and learning 1%.

  6. 6.

    These are, of course, perceived contributions as evaluated by the respondents in general, not actual amount of care and work provided by older people. We use this approach to proxy this information.

  7. 7.

    In some sense, caring roles are, today, often considered only as alternatives to paid services, and this rationale is used also in recent discussions on introducing carers’ leave and carers’ benefits (i.e. care as work) in the Czech Rep.

References

  • Avramov, D., & Mašková, M. (2003). Active ageing in Europe. Population studies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys, L., & Miller, E. (2012). Active ageing: Developing a quantitative multidimensional measure. In G. Boulton-Lewis & M. Tam (Eds.), Active ageing, active learning, issues and challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calasanti, T., & King, N. (2005). Firming the floppy penis. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X04268799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer No. 378 Active Ageing. (2012). [Online] Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_378_en.pdf

  • European Commission. (2005). Green Paper Confronting demographic change: A new solidarity between the generations. [Online]. Retrieved January 24, 2015, from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/situation_in_europe/c10128_en.htm

  • European Value Study. (2008). [Online]. Accessed January 24, 2015, from http://www.gesis.org/en/services/data-analysis/survey-data/european-values-study/

  • Foster, L., & Walker, A. (2015). Active and successful aging: A European policy perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 83–90. Retrieved January 7, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu028

  • Gilbert, T., & Powell, J. (2005). Family, caring and ageing in the United Kingdom. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(1), 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2000). Cultures of ageing. Self, citizenship and the body. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiřička, J. (2013, February 13). Senior budoucnosti: pilně se vzdělává, podniká a nestraní se lidí. Idnes [Online]. Retrieved January 7, 2016, from http://zpravy.idnes.cz/strategie-starnuti-seniori-dp4-/domaci.aspx?c=A130213_135510_domaci_jj

  • Katz, S. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kryńska, E., & Szukalski, P. (2013). Active ageing measures in selected European Union countries. Final Report. Lodz: University of Lodz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Life Roles Survey, Technical Report. (2014). Technická zpráva ze sběru dat – výzkum na téma “Přetížená role”. Brno: Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parris Stephens, M. A., Towsend, A. L., Martire, L. M., & Druley, J. A. (2001). Balancing parent care with other roles: Interrole conflict of adult daughter caregivers. Journal of Gerontology, 56B(1), 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perek-Bialas, J., Ruzik, A., & Vidovićová, L. (2006). Active ageing policies in the Czech Republic and Poland. International Social Science Journal, 58(19), 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranzijn, R. (2004). Role ambiguity: Older workers in the demographic transition. Ageing International, 29(3), 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, D. C., & Mutran, E. J. (2002). Self-concept as the organization of roles: Importance, centrality, and balance. Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 647–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timonen, V. (2008). Ageing societies: A comparative introduction. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidovićová, L., Galčanová, L., & Petrová Kafková, M. (2015). Význam a obsah prarodičovské role u mladých českých seniorů a seniorek [The Meaning and Performance of the Grandparenting Role among Young Old Czechs]. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 51(5), 761–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2006). Active ageing in employment: Its meaning and potential. Asia-Pacific Review, 13(1), 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. World Health Organisation. [Online]. Retrieved January 7, 2016, from www.who.int/ageing/publications/active_ageing/en/

  • Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Vanhuysse, P., & Zolyomi, E. (2013). Active ageing index 2012. Concept, methodology, and final results. Research Memorandum/Methodology Report. Vienna: European Centre. [Online]. Retrieved January 7, 2016, from http://www.euro.centre.org/data/aai/1253897823_70974.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vidovićová, L. (2018). The Expected, Evaluated, Perceived, Valued and Prevalent Social Roles of Older People: Are They by Consent?. In: Zaidi, A., Harper, S., Howse, K., Lamura, G., Perek-Białas, J. (eds) Building Evidence for Active Ageing Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6017-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6017-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6016-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6017-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics