Skip to main content

Uncertainties of a 1D Hydraulic Model with Levee Breaches: The Benchmark Garonne

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Hydroinformatics

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

Abstract

In a fluvial environment, the main role of levees is to canalise water downstream of rivers and to reduce the risk of flooding in nearby areas. Levee failure can be either structural or hydraulic. Structural failure occurs where a breach in a flood defence system leads to the inundation of the protected area whereas hydraulic failure refers to flooding before the designed protection level is attained and without prior damage to the flood defence system. Nowadays, hydrodynamic modelling codes are able to perform hydraulic failure such as overflowing by means of any appropriate weir equation, however, only a few allow to simulate structural failure. HEC-RAS can do both and enables to model levee breaches with a simple but flexible parametric module. The aim of our study is to evaluate the capacity of a 1D hydraulic model to represent levees breaches and subsequent flooding. To do so, a 1D storage area model is built with HEC-RAS and calibrated using data provided by the ‘Benchmark Garonne’ project initiated by EDF. The study case is based on the 1981 historical flood event of the Garonne River between Tonneins and La Réole (Sect. 2). The model is introduced and compared to two other hydraulic models used in the benchmark (Sect. 3). Two sensitivity analyses with respect to sets of hydraulic parameters and levee breach parameters are carried out (Sect. 4). Results expressed as maximum water levels show that the main channel roughness coefficient and the final breach width are the most influencing model parameters, respectively. Levee breaches appear to be a non-negligible source of uncertainty in hydraulic modelling, comparable to uncertainties arising from model structure or model calibration. In order to improve our modelling approach, a ground survey and a literature survey is conducted to collect data about the breaches that occurred in the study area, in particular, during the 1981 flood (Sect. 5). Historical evidence shows that a significant number of breaches occurred since 1875.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allsop, W. (2007). Failure mechanisms for flood defence assets. Oxford: HR Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morris, M. (2009). Breaching processes: A state of the art review. Oxford: HR Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wahl, T. L. (2004). Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(5), 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alliau, D. et al. (2015). Flood study of industrial site by extreme flood risk: Uncertainties with hydrologic and hydraulic extreme values. La Houille Blanche, 2, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mazzoleni, M. et al. (2013). Flooding hazard mapping in floodplain areas affected by piping breaches in the Po River, Italy. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(4), 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vorogushyn, S. et al. (2010). A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches. Water Resources Research, 46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008475.

  7. Brunner, G. (2016). HEC-RAS, River analysis system hydraulic reference manual. US Army Corps of Engineers—Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brunner, G. (2016). HEC-RAS, River analysis system hydraulic reference manual. US Army Corps of Engineers—Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Baldassarre, G., Castellarin, A., & Brath, A. (2009). Analysis of the effects of levee heightening on flood propagation: example of the River Po, Italy. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54(6), 1007–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. SMEPAG. (1989). Monographie des crues de la Garonne (du Pont du Roy au Bec d’Ambès)—2 tomes [Monograph of the Garonne floods (from Pont du Roy to Bec d’Ambès)—2 volumes].

    Google Scholar 

  11. LPCB. (1983). Vallée de la Garonne—Enquête sur les ruptures de digues de Décembre 1981 entre Meilhan et Port Sainte Marie [Garonne Valley—Investigation on the dike breaches of December 1981 between Meilhan and Port Sainte Marie].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Besnard, A., & Goutal, N. (2011). Comparison between 1D and 2D models for hydraulic modeling of a floodplain: Case of Garonne River. La Houille Blanche, 3, 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bozzi, S. et al. (2015). Roughness and Discharge Uncertainty in 1D Water Level Calculations. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 20(4), 343–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-014-9430-6.

  14. Pappenberger, F. et al. (2005). Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. Journal of Hydrology, 302(1), 46–69.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brunner, G. (2016). HEC-RAS, River Analysis System User’s Manual, version 5.0. US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute For Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goodell, C. (2014). Breaking the HEC-RAS Code: A User’s Guide to Automating HEC-RAS. h2ls.

    Google Scholar 

  17. CETMEF. (2005). Notice sur les déversoirs—Synthèse des lois d’écoulement au droit des seuils et déversoirs [Note on weirs—Synthesis of sill and weir flow laws].

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes, J., Leal, J., & Cardoso, A. (2012). Flow structure in a compound channel with smooth and rough floodplains. European Water, 38, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, W. (2011). Earthen Embankment Breaching. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 137(12). doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000498.

  20. Hall, J.W. & al. (2003). A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Maritime and Engineering, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Bruijn, K., Diermanse, F., & Beckers, J. (2014). An advanced method for flood risk analysis in river deltas, applied to societal flood fatality risk in the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(10), 2767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bacchi, V. et al. (2017). Feedback from uncertainties propagation research projects conducted in different hydraulic fields; outcomes for engineering projects and nuclear safety assessment. In SimHydro 2017, 14–16 June 2017, Sophia Antipolis—Nice (France).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen, T. et al. (2015). Uncertainties propagations in 1D hydraulic modeling. La Houille Blanche, 5, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abily, M. et al. (2016). Spatial global sensitivity analysis of high resolution classified topographic data use in 2D urban flood modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R Core Team. (2016). R: A langage and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work could not have been carried out without the organization of the ‘Benchmark Garonne’ project by EDF. The authors would like to thank especially Nicole Goutal and all researchers implied in the project for data provided and rewarding technical exchanges during this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Bertrand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bertrand, N., Liquet, M., Moiriat, D., Bardet, L., Duluc, CM. (2018). Uncertainties of a 1D Hydraulic Model with Levee Breaches: The Benchmark Garonne. In: Gourbesville, P., Cunge, J., Caignaert, G. (eds) Advances in Hydroinformatics . Springer Water. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics