Skip to main content
  • 437 Accesses

Abstract

In the presence of jumps, the financial market is no longer complete, and option payoffs cannot be replicated by a portfolio of primitive assets. The state price density and the pricing kernel are not unique. In order to price options in an incomplete market, either a candidate pricing kernel is used for the risk-neutral evaluation approach, or a general pricing framework built on the equilibrium exchange economy of Lucas (Econometrica, 46:1429–1445, 1978) is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With S&P 500 index options, Santa-Clara and Yan (2010) come to a similar conclusion that the risk premium is a function of both the stochastic volatility and the jump intensity.

  2. 2.

    There is a difference in that the jump risk priced in Merton’s model is not priced because it is assumed to be diversifiable. Here it is not priced because the representative agent is risk-neutral given the restrictions on utility function.

  3. 3.

    The continuous diffusion volatility is unchanged when moving from the risk-neutral measure to the physical measure. See for example Liu et al. (2007). For simplicity, the stochastic volatility is replaced by a constant volatility.

  4. 4.

    The impact of fanning \(\varphi \) shown here is opposite to the conclusion of Ma and Vetzal (1997) because we assume a negative jump while they assume a positive jump.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Chen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Xiamen University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, J. (2018). Simulation Comparison. In: General Equilibrium Option Pricing Method: Theoretical and Empirical Study. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7428-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics