Skip to main content

Precarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Ethics in the Anthropocene
  • 640 Accesses

Abstract

Contemporary urbanism can be characterized by a paradox: It has to depend on a range of precarious spaces—for instance, industrial plants, nuclear power stations, incinerators, landfills: built forms that are critical to the stable functioning of the city—but these spaces also manufacture hazards and risks that destabilize the city. In this chapter, the ethical relationships between precarious spaces, and precarious subjects (i.e., the people living near to these spaces) are redescribed through not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) conflicts on hazardous facility siting. However, precarious subjects have special vulnerabilities that entail unique obligations—vulnerabilities that are at once exacerbated by precarious spaces but obligations that are better safeguarded by these same spaces. This tension then suggests a moral dilemma unique to the emerging condition of precarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, A. (2013). Precarious Japan. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2016). Our wound is not so recent. Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basta, C. (2014). Siting risky facilities: Probabilism, determinism and beyond. Planning Theory, 13(1), 44–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy, B. (1996). Fairness as compassion: Towards a less unfair facility siting policy. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, 7(2), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deamer, P. (2016). Architects, really. In N. Lahiji (Ed.), Can architecture be an emancipatory project? Dialogues on the left (pp. 33–47). Winchester, UK: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, D., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). The dilemma of siting a high-level nuclear waste repository. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, M. (2003). Tragedy, ethics and international relations. International Relations, 17(4), 477–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (2012). Capitalism, socialism, ecology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1999). Cities in civilization: Culture, innovation, and urban order. London: Phoenix Giant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2002). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century (3rd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, N. (2017, May 15). Is the gig economy working? The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/05/15/is-the-gig-economy-working.

  • Hermansson, H. (2007). The ethics of NIMBY conflicts. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (2017). The ordinary virtues: Moral order in a divided world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, L. P., DeVerteuil, G., Kandt, J., Manley, D., & Wu, Q. (2016). On the edge: Changing geographies of the global city precariat in London and Hong Kong. Urban Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1258205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, K. M. (2017). Toward a critical politics of precarity. Sociology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse, W. (1993). The ethics of industrial disasters in a transnational world: The elusive quest for justice and accountability in Bhopal. Alternatives, 18, 475–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. (2009). Fire and ice: Unnatural disasters and the disposable urban poor in post-apartheid Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban Regional Research, 33(1), 165–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolin, J. (1993). Communicating with the future: Implications for nuclear waste disposal. Futures, 25(7), 778–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (2012). Move your city: Ethics, place and risk in the reconstruction of New Orleans. The International Journal of the Constructed Environment, 2(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, J. (2015). The Anthrobscene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M., & Hansson, S. O. (2004). On the application of rights-based moral theories to siting controversies. Journal of Risk Research, 7(7), 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucci, P. (2015). Large infrastructures and conflicts: Searching for “boundary objects”—Reflections from Italian experiences. In E. Gualini (Ed.), Planning and conflict: Critical perspectives on contentious urban developments (pp. 238–258). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (1996). The diversity of moral dilemma. In H. E. Mason (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and moral theory (pp. 11–22). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkiewicz, P. (2016). Sweat makes the green grass grow: The precarious future of Qatar’s migrant workers in the run up to the 2022 FIFA World Cup under the Kafala system and recommendations for effective reform. American University Law Review, 65, 721–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (2010). Arrival city: How the largest migration in history is reshaping our world. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semuels, A. (2018, January 23). The Internet is enabling a new kind of poorly paid hell. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2018/01/amazon-mechanical-turk/551192/.

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. E. (2014). Toxic communities: Environmental racism, industrial pollution, and residential mobility. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessman, L. (2017). When doing the right thing is impossible. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss, F. (2013). Cities by design: The social life of urban form. Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsahuridu, E. E. (2006). Anomie and ethics at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1999). Moral luck: Philosophical papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chan, J.K.H. (2019). Precarity. In: Urban Ethics in the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0308-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics