Skip to main content

Using a Concept Map Network Based Constructivist Learning Environment to Design a Learning System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information, Communication and Computing Technology (ICICCT 2018)

Abstract

Meaningful learning is the desired outcome of every learning system and many theories and learning paradigms aim at achieving this goal. Meaningful learning is best achieved if the approach is student centric. Constructivist theory of learning is one such theory that promotes student centric learning and advocates active participation of learner in the learning process rather than passive assimilation of knowledge. This paper discusses the design of one such tool that enables the educator to create a constructivist learning environment for teaching as well assessing the acquired knowledge. The tool uses concept maps as building blocks for creating the learning component as well as assessment component. The paper further discusses the design considerations for developing both of these components. A prototype of the tool was developed for teaching ā€˜Cā€™ programming for the beginners and was tested with undergraduate students who were learning any programming language for the first time. Results indicate that there was a considerable difference in the scores obtained by the learners who were taught the subject using the tool as compared to the learners who were taught the same subject using traditional classroom method and the students taught using the tool performed much better as compared to the other group both in concept based assessments and skill assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D., Hanesian, H.: Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1978)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Barrows, H.S., Tamblyn, R.M.: Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. Springer, New York (1980)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. CaƱas, A.J., Novak, J.D.: Freedom vs. restriction of content and structure during concept mapping - possibilities and limitations for construction and assessment. In: CaƱas, A.J., Novak, J.D., Vanhear, J. (eds.) Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Concept Mapping, Valletta, Malta, 17ā€“20 September 2012, vol. 2, pp. 247ā€“257 (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Carneson, J., Delpierre, G., Masters, K.: Designing and Managing Multiple Choice Questions. Southrock Corpora, Australia (2003)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Chen, T.: Recommendations for creating and maintaining effective networked learning communities: a review of the literature. Int. J. Instr. Media 30(1), 35ā€“44 (2003)

    MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Fuhrman, M.: Developing good multiple-choice tests and test questions. J. Geosci. Educ. 44(4), 379ā€“384 (1996). https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-44.4.379

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., Abderson, T.: Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interactive analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 17(4), 397ā€“431 (1997)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Harper, R.: Multiple-choice questions ā€“ a reprieve. BEE-j 2, 2ā€“6 (2003)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Hmelo-Silver, C.E.: Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(3), 235ā€“266 (2004)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Hootstein, E.: Wearing four pairs of shoes: the roles of e-learning facilitators (2002). http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/oct2002/elearn.html

  11. Hudson, J.P.: Pathways between Eastern and Western Education. Information Age Publishing Inc., Charlotte (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Jonassen, D.E., Peck, K.L., Wilson, B.G.: Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Jonassen, D.: Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 39(3), 5ā€“14 (1991)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Jonassen, D.H.: Designing constructivist learning environments. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, pp. 217ā€“239. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah (1999)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Kelly, A.E.: Theme issue: the role of design in educational research. Educ. Res. 32(1) (2003)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J.W., Kreijns, K., Beers, P.J.: Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 52(3), 47ā€“66 (2004)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Land, S., Hannafin, M.J.: Student-centered learning environments. In: Jonassen, D.H., Land, S.M. (eds.) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, pp. 1ā€“23. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. McClure, J.R., Sonak, B., Suen, H.K.: Concept map assessment of classroom learning: reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 36(4), 475ā€“492 (1999)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Merrill, D.: Constructivism and instructional design. Educ. Technol. 31(5), 45ā€“53 (1991)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. MĆ¼hling, A.: Investigating knowledge structures in computer science education. (Doctoral Dissertation, Technische UniversitƤt MĆ¼nchen) (2014). https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1190967/1190967.pdf

  21. Li, N.: Approaches to learning: literature review. IB research paper (2010). https://studylib.net/doc/18404764/approaches-to-learningā€“literature-review

  22. Piaget, J.: The Construction of Reality in the Child. Ballantine Books, New York City (1975)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Salmon, G.: E-Moderating: The Key to Online Teaching and Learning, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London (2004)

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Wood, E.J.: What are extended matching sets questions? BEE-j 1(1), 1ā€“2 (2003)

    MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Ayala, C.C., Shavelson, R.J.: Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 42(2), 166ā€“184 (2005)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minakshi Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sharma, M., Chawla, S. (2019). Using a Concept Map Network Based Constructivist Learning Environment to Design a Learning System. In: Minz, S., Karmakar, S., Kharb, L. (eds) Information, Communication and Computing Technology. ICICCT 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 835. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5992-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5992-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5991-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5992-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics