Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Tawhidi Methodological Worldview
  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explains the expanded understanding of Tawhid as the law of ‘everything’ in the framework of the primal ontology and imminent episteme of unity of knowledge between the details of world-system. The derivation of such a wide meaning of organic unity of knowledge as the foundation of explaining the primal ontology of Tawhid is from the Qur’an. The resulting derivation that overarches its meaning across the heavens and the earth and what lies below and above is explained to be universally unique. Tawhid as law is thus argued to be distinctly separate from the rules of shari’ah. The rules of shari’ah are constrained to the earthly domain, and then too in a limited way based on human concocted innovation. Thus the substantive premise of Tawhid as the sole law of the Qur’an in contrariness to shari’ah is explained. Details continue throughout this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kant wrote (see Friedrich, 1949, p. 25): “This, then, is a question which at least calls for closer examination, and does not permit any off-hand answer: whether there is any knowledge that is thus independent of experience and even of all impressions of the senses. Such knowledge is entitled a priori, and is distinguished from the empirical, which has its sources a posteriori, that is, in experience.”

References

  • Ashur, M. T. I. (2013). Treatise on Maqasid as-Shari’ah. U.S.A: International Institute of Islamic Thought, Herndon, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attia, G. E. (2008). Towards Realization of the higher intents of Islamic law: A functional approach of Maqasid as-Shari’ah (p. 2008). Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shari’ah as philosophy of Islamic law, a systems approach. Herndo, Virginia: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, J. D. (1991). Theories of everything, the quest for ultimate explanation. Oxford, Eng: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, M. A. (2017). A phenomenological theory of Islamic economics. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaya Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djibrilla, M. M., Buang, A. H., & Olayemi, A. A. M. (2017). The challenges of shari’ah compliance in the Islamic banking practices: Whether Ibn Qayyim’s principles of muamalat be the panacea? Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 14(1), 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elis, G. F. R. (2008). Multiverses and ultimate causation. In F. Watts (Ed.), Creation, law and probability (pp. 59–80). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law (p. 92). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafatos, M., & Nadeau, R. (1990). Searching for the ground: Mutation, mind, and the epistemology of science. In The conscious universe, part and whole in modern physical theory. Springer: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1949). In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The philosophy of Kant. New York, NY: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality (p. 25). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. S., & Lavoie, M. (2013). In defense of post-Keynesian and heterodox economics (p. 109). Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdi, M. (1964). Ibn Khaldun’s philosophy of history. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, M. (2016). The performance measurement of Islamic banking based on the maqasid framework. In Choudhury, M. A. (Ed.), Islamic financial economy and Islamic banking. Routledge, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickthall, M. M. (2014 reprinted). Meaning of the glorious Qur’an, Global Grey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, R. (1982a). Large cardinals. In Infinity and the mind, Bantam Books: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, R. (1982b). Excursion I: The transfinite cardinals. In Infinity and the mind (pp. 239–286). Bantam Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and economics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spenser, N. (2000). On the significance of distinguishing ontology and epistemology; contributed by Neville Spencer upon request, March 2000. See also Critical realism and reality by Andy Blunden, 2009. Internet version.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tag el-Din, S. I. (2013). Maqsid foundations of market economics. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masudul Alam Choudhury .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Choudhury, M.A. (2019). Introduction. In: Choudhury, M. (eds) The Tawhidi Methodological Worldview . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6585-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics