Skip to main content

Effect of Substrates on Azotobacter chroococcum-Enriched Vermicompost for Growth of Phaseolus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management

Part of the book series: Microorganisms for Sustainability ((MICRO,volume 13))

Abstract

Inoculation of Azotobacter chroococcum in preparing organic compost by vermicomposting using Eisenia fetida (common names: red worm, brandling worm, panfish worm, trout worm, tiger worm, red wiggler worm, red Californian earthworm) can promote the growth of the Phaseolus bean. Various abiotic stresses, such as drought and salinity, are among the major environmental constraints that limit growth, productivity, and quality of plants. The growth promotion of Phaseolus bean with inoculation of A. chroococcum in the presence of vermicompost using different substrate combinations was assessed by a number of nodules, shoot length, root length, dry shoot weight, dry root weight, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK) content of the plant. Among different substrates used, cow dung only and cow dung plus straw could be enriched with A. chroococcum with survival period up to 5 weeks. However, cow dung plus chopped grass and cow dung plus ground grass couldn’t be enriched with A. chroococcum. A significant positive response was noted in all growth parameters when the plant was inoculated with A. chroococcum in the presence of vermicompost compared to the untreated control plants. Cow dung plus straw had been used as a substrate for the enrichment of vermicomposting with A. chroococcum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya MS (1997) Integrated vermiculture for rural development. Int J Rural Stud 4:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas RM, Bartha R (2000) Biogeochemical cycling. In: Earl W, Fogel L, Wong G (eds) Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications, 4th edn. Pearson Education Asia, Singapore, pp 417

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea JM, Brown ME (1974) Effects on plant growth produced by Azotobacter paspali related to synthesis of plant growth regulating substances. J Appl Bacteriol 37(4):583–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beijerinck M (1901) Sur des microbes oligonitrophiles. Archives nĂ©erl. Science Series 2(8):190–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari SC, Somani LL (1990) Azotobacter. In: Somani LL, Bhandari SC, Saxena SN, Vyas KK (eds) Biofertilizers. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 354–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai H (2001) Effects of co-inoculation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Bradyrhizobium japonicum in nodulation, growth and nitrogen fixation of soybean. MSc thesis. Tribhuan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas JC, Ladha JK, Dazzo FB (2000) Rhizobia inoculation improves nutrient uptake and growth of lowland rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1644–1650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borges YV, Alves L, Bianchi I, Espindola JC, Oliveira JM, Radetski CM, Somensi CA (2017) Optimization of animal manure vermicomposting based on biomass production of earthworms and higher plants. J Environ Sci Health B 52(11):791–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bressani R (1993) Grain quality of common beans. Food Rev Int 9(2):237–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das J, Ramesh KV, Maithri U, Mutangana D, Suresh CK (2014) Response of aerobic rice to Piriformospora indica. Indian J Exp Biol 52:237–251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon J (2006) The nitrogen cycle and nitrogen fixation. In: The microbial world: the nitrogen cycle and nitrogen fixation. Jim Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, The University of Edinburgh, pp, pp 569–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Burrows I (1988) The potential of earthworm compost as plant growth media. In: Neuhauser E, Edwards CA (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 2l–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity GB, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JR (eds) (2005) The proteobacteria, Part B: the Gammaproteobacteria. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28022-7. Springer the US, pp 384

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach M, Voel J (1902) Nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie 2:817

    Google Scholar 

  • Hait S, Tare V (2011) Optimizing vermistabilization of waste activated sludge using vermicompost as bulking material. Waste Manag 31(3):502–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kay DE (1979) Food legumes. London: Tropical Products Institute- TPI crop and product digest no. 3. London, ISBN 0859540855, pp 435

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C, Rudnick P, MacDonald ML, Melton T (2015) Azotobacter Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan AA, Mohammad S, Muhammad S Naqvi S (2009) Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: occurrence, mechanisms and their role in crop production. J Agric Biol Sci 1(1):48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Manandhar S, Tuladhar R, Prajapati K, Singh A, Varma A (2017) Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum and Piriformospora indica on Oryza sativa in presence of vermicompost. In: Prasad R, Varma A, Tuteja N (eds) Mycorrhiza-nutrient uptake, biocontrol, ecorestoration. Springer, Cham, pp 327–339

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati K, Yami KD, Singh A (2010) Plant growth promotional effect of Azotobacter chroococcum, Piriformospora indica, and vermicompost on rice plant. Nepal J Sci Technol 9:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R, Kumar M, Varma A (2015) Role of PGPR in soil fertility and plant health. In: Egamberdieva D, Shrivastava S, Varma A (eds) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and medicinal plants. Springer, Cham, pp 247–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saha B, Devi C, Khwairakpam M, Kalamdhad AS (2018) Vermicomposting and anaerobic digestion-viable alternative options for terrestrial weed management-A review. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 17:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K, Garg VK (2017) Comparative analysis of vermicompost quality produced from rice straw and paper waste employing earthworm Eisenia fetida (Sav.). Bioresour Technol 250:708–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2004) Immunocharacterization of Piriformospora indica and other identical root endophytes. PhD thesis. Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Sharma S (2002) Composting of a crop residue through treatment with microorganisms and subsequent vermicompost. Bioresour Technol 85:107–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuladhar R, Shrestha J, Singh A, Varma A (2013) Enhanced productivity associated with tripartite symbiosis between Phaseolus, Rhizobia, and Piriformospora indica in presence of vermicompost. In: Varma A, Kost G, OelmĂĽller R (eds) Piriformospora indica. Soil biology, vol 33. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma A, Sudha S, Franken P (1999) Piriformospora indica- a cultivable plant growth promoting root endophytes with similarities to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2741–2744

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh KB (1995) Physiology of the legume nodule and its response to stress. Soil Biol Biochem 27:637–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, S. et al. (2019). Effect of Substrates on Azotobacter chroococcum-Enriched Vermicompost for Growth of Phaseolus. In: Sayyed, R. (eds) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management . Microorganisms for Sustainability, vol 13. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6986-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics