Abstract
The transformation of undergraduate science and math education will require broad-based faculty motivation to integrate innovative evidence-based pedagogies into classroom practice and advance scholarship in teaching and learning. Currently, the traditional lecture approach remains the dominant model in these disciplines. While research suggests that high-impact practices and active learning pedagogies may improve the success of students from historically underrepresented groups (HUGs), faculty must be motivated to invest their time and effort to do this work. Consequently, three strands of motivation theory (motivation, self-determination, and self-efficacy) may provide a framework for exploring faculty adoption and advancement of potentially transformative practices. Herein, motivation theory can support our investigation of the personal and institutional dynamics that promote and/or hinder faculty integration of high-impact and evidence-based pedagogical innovations into classroom practice. The study reported in this chapter uses quantitative methods to explore faculty engagement in scholarly teaching and other innovative educational practices that purport to increase success of HUGs in the STEM fields at a land-grant doctoral research university in the southeastern region of the USA. The university has a historical mission of educating HUGs and a designation of HBCU (Historically Black Colleges and Universities). One primary research question guides this effort: “To what extent do HBCU STEM faculty feel motivated to engage in high-impact, evidence-based pedagogies?” This work is important in the broader STEM education community for understanding how to foster faculty engagement in transforming the paradigm of instruction in the college classroom with a focus on student success.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2014). Achieving systemic change: A sourcebook for advancing and funding undergraduate STEM Education. In C. Fry (Ed.),. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Anderson, W. A., Banerjee, U., Drennan, C., Elgin, S., Epstein, I., Handelsman, J., et al. (2011). Science education. Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science (New York, NY), 331(6014).
Austin, A. E. (2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. Ann E. Austin.
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and weil-being in two work settings 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068.
Babco, E. (2003). Trends in African American and Native American participation in STEM higher education. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology, 1200.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207.
Colbeck, C. L., Cabrera, A. F., & Marine, R. J. (2002). Faculty motivation to use alternative teaching methods.
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the twenty-first century(U.S.), & Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (U.S.). (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the twenty-first century(U.S.), & Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (U.S.). (2010). Rising above the gathering storm revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78(10), 1056–1063.
Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do. Putnam Publishing Group.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002a). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002b). The paradox of achievement: The harder you push, the worse it gets.
Diamond, R. M., & Adam, B. E. (1998). Changing Priorities at Research Universities, 1991–1996. Based on: The National Study of Research Universities on the Balance between Research and Undergraduate Teaching (1992), by Peter J. Gray, Robert C. Froh, Robert M. Diammond. ERIC.
Feldman, K. A., & Paulsen, M. B. (1999). Faculty motivation: The role of a supportive teaching culture. New directions for teaching and learning, 1999(78), 69–78.
Gaffney, J. D., Richards, E., Kustusch, M. B., Ding, L., & Beichner, R. J. (2008). Scaling up education reform. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(5), 48.
Goins, G., White, C., Foushee, D., Smith, M., Whittaker, J., & Byrd, G. (2009). HBCUs Model for Success. Successful Models for Effectively Retaining and Graduating Students at North Carolina A&T State University, New York: Thurgood Marshall College Fund Book.
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522.
Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. Academic Press.
Hardré, P., Miller, R., Beasley, A., Pace, T., Maxwell, M., & Xie, K. (2007). What motivates university faculty members to do research?: Tenure-track faculty in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 2(1), 75–99.
Hardré, P. L. (2012). Community college faculty motivation for basic research, teaching research, and professional development. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(8), 539–561.
Hardré, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 35–69.
Macdonald, R. H., Manduca, C. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge survey of US faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 237–252.
Mack, K. M., Rankins, C. M., & Winston, C. E. (2011). Black women faculty at historically black colleges and universities: Perspectives for a national imperative. Diversity in Higher Education, 11, 149–164.
Mazur, E., & Hilborn, R. C. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Physics Today, 50, 68.
Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (2008). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL). USA: Oxford University Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington DC: National Academies Press. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984.html.
National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation, N. C. f. S. a. E. S. (2013). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013. Special Report http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/. Accessed 304 NSF 13.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Executive Office of the President. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-executive-report-final_2–13-12.pdf.
Reeve, J. (1996). Motivating others: Nurturing inner motivational resources. Allyn & Bacon.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Self Determination Theory (SDT). http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/theory. Accessed 21 October, 2018.
Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(1), 6–15.
Twigg, C. A. (2011). The math emporium: Higher education’s silver bullet. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(3), 25–34.
Wieman, C. (2007). Why not try a scientific approach to science education? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(5), 9–15.
Wieman, C. (2012). Applying new research to improve science education. Issues in Science and Technology, 1–8.
Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S. Y., et al. (2012a). Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate stem disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148–156.
Wilson, Z. S., Iyengar, S. S., Pang, S.-S., Warner, I. M., & Luces, C. A. (2012b). Increasing access for economically disadvantaged students: The NSF/CSEM & S-STEM programs at Louisiana State University. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 581–587.
Wright, M. (2005). Always at odds? Congruence in faculty beliefs about teaching at a research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 331–353.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) by Award number HRD-1719498.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson-Kennedy, Z.S., Huang, L., Kennedy, E., Tang, G., Kanipes, M.I., Byrd, G.S. (2019). Faculty Motivation for Scholarly Teaching and Innovative Classroom Practice—An Empirical Study. In: Schultz, M., Schmid, S., Lawrie, G. (eds) Research and Practice in Chemistry Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6998-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6998-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6997-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6998-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)