Skip to main content

An Employment Model of Social Enterprises and the Effects of Government Subsidy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Issues in Applied Economics
  • 391 Accesses

Abstract

We consider an employment model of social enterprises which maximize the weighted average of profit and social value generated by employing disadvantaged workers. The social value consists of the direct welfare improvement of the disadvantaged employees and the positive ripple effect so generated. In the Cournot oligopoly model, we show that social enterprises can contribute to improving social welfare (the sum of the standard social surplus and the social value). We propose a subsidy scheme for social enterprises, the subsidy amount of which is proportional to the social performance (measured by social value). We show that the subsidy can play a positive role in providing incentives for social enterprises to produce more social values and in enhancing social welfare. Finally, we provide an empirical analysis on the effects of the government subsidy on economic and social performances of social enterprises using the case of Korea during 2014-2017. We use the voluntary disclosure data of social enterprises certified by Korean Government. Only the subsidy for social insurance fees has a positive effect on the social performance while the subsidy for personnel expenses, the major part of the government expenditure, has neither positive nor negative effect. On the other hand, subsidies for personnel expenses and social insurance fees have positive effects on net income. Our results suggest a proposal for redesigning the current subsidy scheme in order to improve its effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

Notes

  1. 1.

    See more detailed explanation on social enterprises in the web page of Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency http://www.socialenterprise.or.kr.

  2. 2.

    Also are 128 social service provision types, 120 local community contribution types, 189 mixed types, and 239 other types. The “other types” refers to the cases where it is difficult to quantify whether or not the social purpose of the social enterprise is realized.

  3. 3.

    Different models need to be constructed to deal with the other types of social enterprises since their social purposes are different from the one we consider here. Hence the social values created by the other types also differ considerably. For instance, Hong and Ju (2016) provide a model of social enterprises that provide social services for the disadvantaged.

  4. 4.

    Social values are distinct from positive externalities because social values are explicitly taken into account in social enterprises’ decision-making. Nevertheless, the reduction of social costs (e.g., the increase in crime rate, the spread of the social unrest, and so on) may not be fully reflected in the decision making of social enterprises and so it also exhibits positive externality, which can be the basis of supporting social enterprises.

  5. 5.

    Similar to our definition of social value is the goal of social enterprises in Chu (2015), where social enterprises are assumed to maximize the surplus of the disadvantaged. In Cho and Lee (2017), the objective function of social enterprises is the sum of consumer surplus and social value created in proportion to production of social enterprises.

  6. 6.

    In Korea, the government provides various subsidies for only social enterprises certified by the Korean government based on the Social Enterprise Promotions Act.

  7. 7.

    Social performances includes the number of vulnerable workers employed, their working hour and wage, the number of beneficiaries of social services, the reinvestment of profits on social purposes, and so on.

  8. 8.

    The income increase of disadvantaged workers, that is, social value produced by social enterprises should be measured using the market wage of disadvantaged workers. Since we could not obtain their market wage (i.e., their productivity), we inevitably used the minimum wage. Also we did not take into account credit constraint of disadvantaged workers and secondary social value. Therefore social value used in our analysis can be interpreted as the most conservative estimation of true social values.

References

  • Alter, K. 2007. Social Enterprise Typology, Virtue Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S.M., and S.H. Lee. 2017. Subsidization policy on the social enterprise for the underprivileged. Korean Economic Review 3 (1): 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, C.Y. 2015. Cyrus, Warren Buffet versus Muhammad Yunus. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 171 (4): 696–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davister, C., J. Defourny, and O. Grégoire. 2004. Work integration social enterprises in the European Union: an overview of existing models. RECMA–Revue Internationale de l’Economie Sociale 293 : 24–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, H. 2006. Social enterprise: Beyond economic outcomes and individual returns. Social entrepreneurship, 180–205. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H.W., and B.G. Ju. 2016. An economic analysis of social enterprises: Social service provision type. Korean Journal of Public Finance 9 (1): 87–112 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H.S., and Y.K. Kim. 2016. A study on the social and economic performance of social enterprise. Journal of Finance and Accounting Information 16 (1): 1–29 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, M.H., and G.S. Yang. 2015. Exploring influential factors of social enterprise on job creation. Korean Journal of Public Administration 24 (3): 121–146 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneda, M., and A. Matsui. 2003. Do profit maximizers maximize profit? Divergence of objective and result in oligopoly. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, K., and Y. Tomaru. 2007. Mixed oligopoly, privatization, subsidization, and the order of firms’ moves: Several types of objectives. Economics Letters 96 (2): 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.I. 2014. A study on the performance difference depend on the characteristics and support type of social enterprise: Focusing on the social enterprise notifying management information autonomously. Journal of Korean Social Welfare Administration 16 (2): 181–212. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.C. 2015. A study on performance analysis of social enterprises. Korean Journal of Business Administration 28 (7): 1797–1812 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.H., and J.K. Lee. 2012. The analysis of economic and social performances of social enterprises. Korean Public Administration Quarterly 24 (4): 1037–1063 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. 1954. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4): 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura, T. 1998. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics 70: 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura, T., and O. Kanda. 2005. Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. Journal of Economics 84: 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1992. Human functioning and social justice. In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory 20 (2): 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971, 1999. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1987. The standard of living. In The standard of living: The tanner lectures on human values, ed. Sen, Muellbauer, Kanbur, Hart, and Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L., and E. Diener. 2011. Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2): 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Mark D. 1996. Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Economics Letters 53: 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is based on our article “An Employment Model of Social Enterprises and the Effects of Government Subsidy”, Journal of Korean Economic Analysis, Vol. 23(3), Dec., 2017 (in Korean). The empirical analysis in the published article has been updated with more recent data. We are grateful to Sung-Jin Cho, Wonki Cho, Jinwoo Kim and Woojin Lee for many valuable comments and suggestions. Biung-Ghi Ju acknowledges financial supports from Center for Distributive Justice, Institute of Economic Research at Seoul National University and from Korean Research Foundation (NRF-2016S1A3A2924944). Hyunwoo Hong acknowledges financial support from Korean Research Foundation (NRF-2016H1A2A1906832).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biung-Ghi Ju .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hong, H., Ju, BG. (2019). An Employment Model of Social Enterprises and the Effects of Government Subsidy. In: Hosoe, M., Ju, BG., Yakita, A., Hong, K. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Applied Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7036-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics