Skip to main content

A Microeconomic Analysis of the Declining Labor Share in Japan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Labor Income Share in Asia

Part of the book series: ADB Institute Series on Development Economics ((ADBISDE))

Abstract

The labor share in Japan has been declining significantly over the last three decades, accompanied by persistent stagnation and an unprecedented increase in economic inequalities. Since these dynamics are likely to be interrelated, understanding the drivers of the labor share might contribute significantly to the Japanese economic and policy debate. Surprisingly, the existing literature on the labor share in Japan is rather limited and confined to country or industry studies. We first attempt to analyze the drivers of the labor share in Japan at the firm level. To this aim, we employ a panel of manufacturing firms from the Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities, spanning from 2001 to 2012. By means of panel data estimators, we show how, besides technological variables, firms’ labor share depends significantly on the share of regular workers, on the importance of firms’ international engagement, and on various institutional settings of the product and labor markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to collinearity issues, the two-step GMM model does not include prefecture dummies.

  2. 2.

    We estimate the total factor productivity following the method that Olley and Pakes (1996) proposed and normalize it by subtracting the sector average of TFP in 2000. We also estimate the model using the non-normalized TFP and the normalized TFP based on the sector average of the TFP in 1995. The results are consistent with those presented in Table 2 and are available on request.

  3. 3.

    In the data that we use, the average capital–labor ratio gradually increased in the late 1990s and reached its peak in 2002. After some years of relative stability, it declined steadily after 2008.

  4. 4.

    According to the information that the Ministry of Health, Labour and Wealth (December 2017) provided, the estimated trade union organization rate amounted to 17.1% in 2017.

  5. 5.

    We also estimate the model with a different age threshold (40-year-olds and 45-year-olds). The results are very similar to the ones that we present in Table 4 and are available on request.

  6. 6.

    According to the “Labour Force Survey” that the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Telecommunication implemented, the number of female workers in the manufacturing industry was 4.33 million in 2002, following the application of the new industrial classification, but decreased to 3.17 million in 2012. During this period, except for 2006, it consistently decreased. During the same period, the proportion of women in manufacturing workers also declined from 33.5% to 29.5%.

  7. 7.

    According to our data, the correlation coefficient between the sector-level labor share and the female employment share amounted, for the whole period, to 0.0877. On a year-by-year basis, it increased steadily over time.

  8. 8.

    We also run estimates using an alternative definition of import impacts (import/output), and these largely confirm the results. Furthermore, dropping the firm-level dummy variable for imports does not make any significance difference to the outcomes that we present in Table 4.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Handbook of labour economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1043–1171). North-Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnese, P., & Sala, H. (2011). The driving forces behind the falling labour share and persistent unemployment in Japan. Pacific Economic Review 16(5), 577–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • AntrĂ s, P. (2004). Is the U.S. aggregate production function Cobb–Douglas? New estimates of the elasticity of substitution. Contributions in Macroeconomics 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1534-6005.1161.

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpaia, A., Prez, E., & Pichelmann, K. (2009). Understanding labour income share dynamics in Europe. MPRA Paper 15649. University Library of Munich, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2017). Concentrating on the fall of the labour share. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 107(5), 180–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat, G., Manning, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). Privatization and the decline of labour’s share: International evidence from network industries. Economica 79 (315), 470–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi Badi, H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkai, S. (2016). Declining labour and capital shares. Mimeo, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassanini, A., & Manfredi, T. (2012). Capital’s grabbing hand? A cross-country/cross-industry analysis of the decline of the labour share. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 133. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bental, B., & Demougin, D. (2010). Declining labour shares and bargaining power: An institutional explanation. Journal of Macroeconomics, 32, 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S., & Saint-Paul, G. (2003). Explaining movements in the labour share. Contributions to Macroeconomics, 3(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D., Ma, H., & Nishioka, S. (2015). Declining labour shares and heterogeneous firms. Working Paper 552. Stanford Centre for International Development, Stanford, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D., Ma, H., & Nishioka, S. (2017). Does capital–labour substitution or do institutions explain declining labour shares? Working Paper 6060. Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Scott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Giavazzi, F. (2003). Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labour markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 879–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockerman, P., & Maliranta, M. (2012). Globalization, creative destruction, and labour share change: Evidence on the determinants and mechanisms from longitudinal plant level data. Oxford Economic Papers, 64(2), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroli, E., & Van Reenen, J. (2001). Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1449–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crinò, R. (2012). Service offshoring and the skill composition of labour demand. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(1), 375–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Aglio, V., Magnani, M., & Marchini, P. L. (2015). A firm level analysis of the labour share. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 2, 179–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. (1998). Does European unemployment prop up American wages? National labour markets and global trade. American Economic Review, 88, 478–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreuse, B., & Maarek, P. (2011). Can the HOS model explain changes in labour shares? A tale of trade and wage rigidities. Mimeo, HAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsby, M. W. L., Hobijn, B., & Sahin, A. (2013). The decline of the U.S. labour share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 47(2), 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). The labour income share in the European union. In Employment in Europe 2007 (pp. 237–272). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. (1999). The impact of outsourcing and high technology capital on wages: Estimates for the United States 1979–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 907–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukao, K., & Perugini, C. (2018). The long-run dynamics of the labour share in Japan. Discussion Paper Series A, 672. IER, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Growiec, J. (2012). Determinants of the labour share: evidence from a panel of firms. Eastern European Economics, 50(5), 23–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerriero, M., & Sen, K. (2012). What determines the share of labour in National income? A cross-country analysis. IZA Discussion Papers 6643. Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA), Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guscina, A. (2006). Effects of globalization on labour’s share in National income. IMF Working Paper 06294. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. (2002). Has globalization eroded labour’s share? Some cross-country evidence. Mimeo, UC Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., & Persyn, D. (2012). Globalisation, concentration and footloose firms: In Search of the main cause of the declining labour share. Review of World Economics, 148(1), 17–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, D. S., & Lee, B. H. (2015). Wage share and corporate policies in personnel management in Korea: A firm-level study. Mimeo, ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2011). The labour share of income: Determinants and potential contribution to exiting the financial crisis. In World of work report 2011: Making markets work for jobs. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2007). The globalization of labour. In World economic outlook (pp. 161–192). Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaumotte, F., & Tytell, I. (2007). How has the globalization of labour affected the labour income share in advanced countries? IMF Working Papers 298, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayadev, A. (2007). Capital account openness and the labour share of income. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(3), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In F. Lutz (Ed.), The theory of capital. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabarbounis, L., & Neiman, B. (2014). The global decline of the labour share. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 61–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, D., SantaeulĂ lia-Llopis, R., & Zheng, Y. (2016). Labour share decline and intellectual property products capital. Working Paper 927. Barcelona Graduate School of Economics, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyyra, T., & Maliranta, M. (2008). The micro-level dynamics of declining labour share: Lessons from the finnish great leap. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(6), 1147–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, M., & Whelan, K. T. (2011). Understanding the dynamics of labour shares and inflation. Journal of Macroeconomics, 33, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lileeva, A. (2008). Trade liberalization and productivity dynamics: Evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 41, 360–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Wealth, Japan. (2017). Basic survey of labor unions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The Dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, M., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2018). The long-run decline in labour share: Technology versus institutions. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, C., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2017). Globalisation and the decline of the labour share: A microeconomic perspective. Economic Systems, 41, 524–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T., & Zucman, G. (2014). Capital is back: Wealth-income ratios in rich countries 1700–2010. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1255–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piva, M., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2005). The skill bias effect of technological and organisational change: Evidence and policy implications. Research Policy, Elsevier, 34(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far?. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegenthaler, M., & Stucki, T. (2015). Dividing the pie: The determinants of labour’s share of income on the firm level. International Labour Relations Review 68(5), 1157–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, M. J. (2000). Production transfer within multinational enterprises and American wages. Journal of International Economics, 50, 449–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, F. (2005). Causes of decline in labour’s share in Japan. JCER Researcher Report No. 53, The Japan Center for Economic Research, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakita, S. (2006). The lost decade in the Japanese labour market: Labour’s share and Okun’s law. Public Policy Review, 2(1), 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. (1994). North–South trade, employment and inequality: Changing fortunes in a skill-driven world. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Ito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5 and 6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fukao, K., Ito, K., Perugini, C. (2019). A Microeconomic Analysis of the Declining Labor Share in Japan. In: Fields, G., Paul, S. (eds) Labor Income Share in Asia. ADB Institute Series on Development Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7803-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics