Skip to main content

A Comparison of Applied Element Method and Finite Element Method for Elastostatic Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Structural Integrity Assessment

Abstract

Finite element method (FEM) is a general numerical method to solve differential equations. Applied Element Method (AEM) is also a numerical method, but limited for structural analysis. Instead of node-to-node connection in FEM, applied elements are connected by springs. Stiffness matrix is for a pair of spring rather than for an element. A pair of spring consists of two springs to simulate normal stress (normal spring) and shear stress (shear spring) for a two-dimensional (2D) element. A comparison of AEM and FEM in terms of convergence and processing time is done in this paper. For this, 2D linear and non-linear analysis of structures is carried out. Although the processing time depends upon the features of the computer, the comparison of the results of AEM and FEM on the same system is done. In general, the analysis by AEM takes less time when compared to FEM. This is attributed to the lesser number of degrees of freedom per element in AEM. This reduces the memory requirement in AEM compared to FEM, for same meshing. In the case of linear analysis, AEM is found to be superior when compared to FEM with respect to accuracy. The results from both AEM and FEM converged at almost the same rate. Incremental method of non-linear analysis was attempted. To incorporate material non-linearity in AEM, the stiffness of the springs is varied according to its strain. Both AEM and FEM predicted similar load–deflection curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

α :

Angle of inclination of the line connecting the centre of the element and spring from the x-direction

ε :

Strain

σ :

Stress

a :

Centre–centre distance between elements

b :

Width of beam

d :

Depth of beam

l :

Length of beam

n l :

Number of elements along the length direction

n d :

Number of elements along the depth direction

t :

Thickness of the element

A :

Area of cross section

E :

Young’s modulus of the material

F :

Force vector

G :

Shear modulus of the material

I :

Moment of Inertia

K :

Stiffness matrix

K n :

Stiffness of normal spring

K s :

Stiffness of shear spring

L :

Distance of the spring from the centre of the element

U :

Displacement vector

References

  1. K. Meguro, H. Tagel-Din, A new efficient technique for fracture analysis of structures, Bull. Earthq. Resist. Struct. Res. Cent., IIS, Univ. Tokyo 103 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Meguro, H. Tagel-Din, A new simplified and efficient technique for fracture behavior analysis of concrete structures, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures (1998), p. 911

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Meguro, H. Tagel-Din, Struct. Eng./ Earthquake Eng. 17, 21 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Tagel-Din, K. Meguro, Struct. Eng./Earthquake Eng. 17, 137 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Meguro, H. Tagel-Din, J. Nat. Disaster Sci. 24, 25 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.L. Christy, T.M.M. Pillai, P. Nagarajan, Analysis of concrete beams using applied element method, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing (2018), p. 1

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. ANSYS, ANSYS Mechanical APDL Theory Reference, Release 15 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.S. Desai, J.F. Abel, Introduction to the Finite Element Method – A numerical method for engineering analysis, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.R. Chandrupatla, A.D. Belegundu, Introduction to finite elements in engineering (Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, NJ, 2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Lincy Christy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Christy, D.L., Madhavan Pillai, T.M., Nagarajan, P. (2020). A Comparison of Applied Element Method and Finite Element Method for Elastostatic Problems. In: Prakash, R., Suresh Kumar, R., Nagesha, A., Sasikala, G., Bhaduri, A. (eds) Structural Integrity Assessment. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8767-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8767-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8766-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8767-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics