Skip to main content

Biomechanical Study of Long-Segment Spine Instrumentation: The Effect of Cross-Links

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Man–Machine–Environment System Engineering (MMESE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 576))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1085 Accesses

Abstract

Objective To develop FE models of osteotomized spine and evaluate whether cross-link (CL) improves the instrumentation stiffness and decrease the risk of complications. Methods Firstly, a finite element model without CL was established based on CT images of postoperative male patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis. Secondly, five models were established according to the different numbers and positions of CL. Four loading conditions (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) were applied to the model. The range of motion (ROM), the maximum value and distribution of the implants, and vertebrae stress were compared between models. Results With number of CL increasing, the ROM of instrumented segments was reduced. When loading axial rotation condition, the ROM was reduced by 21.98%. The peak stresses were located on rods during axial rotation, on proximal pedicle screws during flexion, and on the osteotomy site during extension and lateral bending. The CLs had an effect of dispersing stress concentration. Conclusions The application of CLs is able to enhance the rigidity of the construct. With the number of CL increasing, the ROM of the construct is reducing, especially in axial rotation. CLs can also make stress concentration dispersed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lehman RA, Kang DG, Wagner SC, Paik H, Cardoso MJ, Bernstock JD et al (2015) Biomechanical stability of transverse connectors in the setting of a thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine J 15:1629–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wood KB, Wentorf FA, Ogilvie JW, Kim KT (2000) Torsional rigidity of scoliosis constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1893–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Mohr RA, Nguyen BK (2001) Segmental pedicle screw fixation or cross-links in multilevel lumbar constructs. A Biomech Anal Spine J 1:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  4. Valdevit A, Kambic HE, McLain RF (2005) Torsional stability of cross-link configurations: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 5:441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuklo TR, Dmitriev AE, Cardoso MJ, Lehman RA, Erickson M, Gill NW (2008) Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E482–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alizadeh M, Kadir MR, Fadhli MM et al (2013) The use of X-shaped cross-link in posterior spinal constructs improves stability in thoracolumbar burst fracture: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Res 31(9):1447–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liao JC, Chen WP, Wang H (2017) Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures by short-segment pedicle screw fixation using a combination of two additional pedicle screws and vertebroplasty at the level of the fracture: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, Demakakos J, Lenke L, Tropiano P, et al (2015) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 76(Suppl 1):S33–41

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Lenke LG (2011) Vertebral column decancellation for the management of sharp angular spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 20:1703–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CA, Feigl G, Regitnig P (2005) Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gzik M, Wolanski W, Tejszerska D (2008) Experimental determination of cervical spine mechanical properties. Acta Bioeng Biomech 10:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shirazi-Adl SA, Shrivastava SC, Ahmed AM (1894) Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:120–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, Oxland T (1989) Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:1256–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, T., Li, C., Wang, Y. (2020). Biomechanical Study of Long-Segment Spine Instrumentation: The Effect of Cross-Links. In: Long, S., Dhillon, B. (eds) Man–Machine–Environment System Engineering . MMESE 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 576. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8779-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics