Skip to main content

Museology, Cultural Geography, and the Non-representational

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotion and the Contemporary Museum
  • 644 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter commences with an overview of recent trends in museology. Starting from the ‘new’, Boyd and Hughes consider the ways in which museums have become increasingly performative in what they do. From this base, they argue that non-representational theory in cultural geography provides a useful framework for theorising the work of the contemporary museum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. London, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and human geography. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl-Missal, B., & vom Lehn, D. (2015). Aesthetics and atmosphere in museums: A critical marketing perspective. In M. Henning (Ed.), The international handbooks of museum studies (Vol. 3). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, F. (2015). Keeping objects live. In M. Henning (Ed.), The international handbooks of museum studies (Vol. 3). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (2015). There’s something in the air: Sound in the museum. In M. Henning (Ed.), The international handbooks of museum studies (Vol. 3). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craggs, R., Geoghegan, H., & Keighren, I. M. (2013). Collaborative geographies: The politics, practicalities, and promise of working together. London, UK: Historical Geography Research Group, Royal Geographical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, D. (2015). Affect, heritage, feeling. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, S. (2018). Sentimental education: Sound and silence at history museums. Museum & Society, 16, 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, S., & Message, K. (2013). Editorial. In S. Dudley & K. Message (Eds.), Museum worlds: Advances in research. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, M. (2012). ‘For a little road it is not. For it is a great road; it is long’: Performing heritage for development in the Cape. In A. Jackson & J. Kidd (Eds.). Performing heritage: Research, practice and innovation in museum theatre and live interpretation. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. (2005). Positioning the museum for social inclusion. In R. Sandell (Ed.), Museums, society, inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, H. (2010). Museum geography: Exploring museums, collections and museum practice in the UK. Geography Compass, 4, 1462–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, H., & Hess, A. (2015). Object-love at the science museum: Cultural geographies of museum storerooms. Cultural Geographies, 22, 445–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewcock, D. (2014). Doing museology differently. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hächler, B. (2015). Museums as spaces of the present: The case for social scenography. In M. Henning (Ed.), The international handbooks of museum studies (Vol. 3). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive unconscious. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., & Kidd, J. (2012). Performing heritage: Research, practice and innovation in museum theatre and live interpretation. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, S. H. (2016). The performative museum: Designing a total experience. In J. Frykman & M. P. Frykman (Eds.), Sensitive objects: Affects and material culture. Lund, Sweden: Nordic Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, V., & Gray, C. (2013). Museums and the ‘new museology’: Theory, practice, and organisational change. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Message, K., & Witcomb, A. (2015). Introduction: Museum theory, an expanded field. In K. Message & A. Witcomb (Eds.), The international handbooks of museum studies (Vol. 1). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., Woodham, A., & Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2015). Foucault and museum geographies: A case study of the English ‘Renaissance of the Regions’. Social and Cultural Geography, 16, 730–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulot, D. (2014). Museums and museologies. In M. Rampley, T. Lenain, H. Locher, A. Pinnoti, C. Schoell-Glass, & J. Zijlmans (Eds.), Art history and visual studies in Europe: Transnational discourses and national frameworks. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2015). Theorizing museum and heritage visiting. In K. Message & A. Witcomb (Eds.), The International Handbooks of Museum Studies (Vol. 1). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Akagawa, N. (2009). Introduction. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible heritage. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, S. (2018). Museums for the global contemporary. In S. Snell (Ed.), The contemporary museum: Shaping museums for the global now. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, J. (2002). The poetic museum: Reviving historical collections. Munich, Germany: Prestel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, T., & Dewsbury, J.-D. (2000). Dead geographies—And how to make them live. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tupan, M.-A. (2012). Postmodern energetics: Peter Ackroyd’s museum space. In S. Coelsch-Foisner & D. Daphinoff (Eds.), The museal turn. Heidelberg, Germany: Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergo, P. (1989). The new museology. London, UK: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Dittmer, J. (2014). The museum as assemblage: Bringing forth affect at the Australian War Memorial. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29, 122–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2015). Methods in motion: Affecting heritage research. In B. Timm Knudsen & C. Stage (Eds.), Affective methodologies: Developing cultural research strategies for the study of affect. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcomb, A. (2015). Thinking about others through museums and heritage. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Candice P. Boyd .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boyd, C.P., Hughes, R. (2020). Museology, Cultural Geography, and the Non-representational. In: Emotion and the Contemporary Museum. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8883-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics