Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychosocial Factors Associated with Death Penalty: Impact on Families of Victims, Families of Defendants and the “Others”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Death Penalty

  • 825 Accesses

Abstract

The extant literature on death penalty is mostly focused upon arguments in favor or in opposition to death penalty as a punishment for heinous crimes such as murder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This list will vary from one country to another based on the country’s laws and procedures in place for death penalty inmates.

  2. 2.

    For an overview of this project visit https://www.albany.edu/scj/13189.php.

References

  • Adcock, C. F. (2010). The collateral anti-therapeutic effects of the death penalty. Florida Coastal Law Review, 11(2), 289–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D. G., Veronen, L. J., & Smith, S. (1989). Family survivors of homicide victims: Theoretical perspectives and an exploratory study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2(1), 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amick-McMullan, A., Kilpatrick, D. G., & Resnick, H. S. (1991). Homicide as a risk factor for PTSD among surviving family members. Behavior Modification, 15(4), 545–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. (2007). The death penalty v. human rights: Why abolish the death penalty? Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ACT51/002/2007/en/.

  • Antonio, M. E. (2006). I didn’t know it'd be so hard-jurors’ emotional reactions to serving on a capital trial. Judicature, 89(5), 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, M. E. (2008). Stress and the capital jury: How male and female jurors react to serving on a murder trial. Justice System Journal, 29(3), 396–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, M. P. (2002). Journey of family members of homicide victims: A qualitative study of their posthomicide experience. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(3), 372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asaro, M. R. (2001). Working with adult homicide survivors, part I: Impact and sequelae of murder. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 37(3), 95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandes, S. (2000). When victims seek closure: Forgiveness, vengeance and the role of government. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 27(5), 1599–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandes, S. (2009). Victims, “closure”, and the sociology of emotion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of moral education, 31(2), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2008). Moral disengagement in state executions. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology and law (pp. 515–518). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C. (1995). Covering executions. American Journalism Review, 17, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E., Blackwell, B. S., Leonard, P. B., & Mears, M. (2002). Seeking sanctuary: Interviews with family members of capital defendants. Cornell Law Review, 88(2), 382–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns, N. (2009). Contesting the victim card: Closure discourse and emotion in death penalty rhetoric. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(3), 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienen, L. B. (1992). Helping jurors out: Post-verdict debriefing for jurors in emotionally disturbing trials. Indiana Law Journal, 68(4), 1333–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. L. (2006). Families of homicide victims speak: An examination of perceptions of the criminal justice system and capital punishment (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University). Retrieved from https://digital.library.okstate.edu/etd/umi-okstate-1785.pdf.

  • Chinni, D., & Grier, P. (2001, June 11). For survivors, execution isn’t the end. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from https://www.csmonitor.com/2001/0611/p1s2.html.

  • Death Penalty Information Center. (2015). International polls and studies. Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/international-polls-and-studies-0.

  • DeLilly, L. M. (2014). Antithetical to human dignity: Secondary trauma, evolving standards of decency, and the unconstitutional consequences of state-sanctioned executions. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 23, 107–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doka, K. J. (1989). Disenfranchised grief. In K. J. Doka (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow (pp. 3–11). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., & Christensen, T. (2014). Closure and its myths: Victims’ families, the death penalty, and the closure argument. International Review of Victimology, 20(3), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschholz, S., Reed, M. D., Beck, E., & Leonard, P. B. (2003). Offenders’ family members’ responses to capital crimes: The need for restorative justice initiatives. Homicide studies, 7(2), 154–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freinkel, A., Koopman, C., & Speigel, D. (1994). Dissociative symptoms in media eyewitnesses of an execution. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(9), 1335–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, A., Johnson, M. B., & Johnson, I. (2006). Secondary trauma associated with state executions: Testimony regarding execution procedures. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 34(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. L. (1997). An eyeful for an eye-an argument against allowing the families of murder victims to view executions. Brandeis Journal of Family Law, 36(4), 585–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2009). Abolishing the death penalty worldwide: The impact of a “new dynamic”. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2005). Death work a study of the modern execution process (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2016). Executioners at work: Collateral consequences of executions for officers working on death row and in the death house. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 307–324). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/newyork/Documents/Death-Penalty-and-the-Victims-WEB.PDF.

  • Jones, S. J., & Beck, E. (2007). Disenfranchised grief and nonfinite loss as experienced by the families of death row inmates. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 54(4), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2003). Don’t kill in our names: Families of murder victims speak out against the death penalty. New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K. (2004). It hurts so bad: Comparing grieving patterns of the families of murder victims with those of families of death row inmates. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2006). The impact of capital punishment on families of defendants and murder victims’ family members. Judicature, 89(5), 292–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & Norgard, K. (1999). What about our families-using the impact on death row defendants’ family members as a mitigating factor in death penalty sentencing hearings. Florida State University Law Review, 26(4), 1119–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York, USA: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacock, T., & Radelet, M. (2009). Do executions lower homicide rates?: The views of leading criminologists. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 99(2), 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J., & Mitchell, G. (2000). Who owns death? Capital punishment, the American conscience, and the end of executions. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, W. A. (1999). Declaring life at the crossroads of death: Victims’ anti-death penalty views and prosecutors’ charging decisions. Criminal Justice Ethics, 18(2), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madeira, J. L. (2010). “Why rebottle the genie?”: Capitalizing on closure in death penalty proceedings. Indiana Law Journal, 85(4), 1477–1525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. (2013, October 25). The weight of capital punishment on jurors, justices, governors, & executioners. Verdict. Retrieved from https://verdict.justia.com/2013/10/25/weight-capital-punishment-jurors-justices-governors-executioners.

  • Nicolau, I. (2013). Historical evolution of the death penalty abolition as a fundamental human right. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 5(2), 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, M. J., & Osofsky, H. J. (2002). The psychological experience of security officers who work with executions. Psychiatry, 65(4), 358–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, M. J., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). The role of moral disengagement in the execution process. Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 371–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penal Reform International. (2014). Fighting for clients’ lives: The impact of the death penalty on defence lawyers. Retrieved from https://www.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/fighting-for-clients-v3-web.pdf.

  • Penal Reform International. (2015a). UN Secretary-General’s 2015 report to the Human Rights Council on the death penalty Submission by Penal Reform International (PRI). Retrieved from https://www.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Wider-impacts-of-the-death-penalty-submission-to-UN-Secretary-General-annual-report.pdf.

  • Penal Reform International. (2015b). Prison guards and the death penalty. Retrieved from https://www.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/PRI-Prison-guards-briefing-paper.pdf.

  • Radelet, M. L., & Borg, M. J. (2000). The changing nature of death penalty debates. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, J. (2013). Life after loss: Contemporary grief counseling and therapy. Eau Claire, USA: PESI Publishing & Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, O., & Brett, R. (2013). Lightening the load of the parental death penalty on children. Quaker United Nations Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemungal, F., Seal, L., & Black, L. (2016). Death penalty and its impact on the professionals involved in the execution process. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 295–306). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/newyork/Documents/Death-Penalty-and-the-Victims-WEB.PDF.

  • Shaheed, A., & Sanei, F. (2016). Outlier: Iran and its use of the death penalty. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 181–209). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/newyork/Documents/Death-Penalty-and-the-Victims-WEB.PDF.

  • Sharp, S. F. (2005). Hidden victims: The effects of the death penalty on families of the accused. New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S. F. (2016). Hidden victims: The families of those facing the death penalty. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 222–235). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/newyork/Documents/Death-Penalty-and-the-Victims-WEB.PDF.

  • Sheffer, S. (2013). Fighting for their lives: Inside the experience of capital defense attorneys. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ssuubi, F. (2016). The impact of the death penalty on the children with a parent on death row or executed. In I. Šimonović (Ed.), Death penalty and the victims (pp. 236–251). New York: United Nations Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/newyork/Documents/Death-Penalty-and-the-Victims-WEB.PDF.

  • United Nations Human Rights Council. (2012). Moving away from the death penalty: Lessons from national experience. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Lists/MeetingsNY/Attachments/27/moving_away_from_death_penalty_web.pdf.

  • United Nations Human Rights Council. (2013, July 24). Question of the death penalty—Report of the Secretary-General (Report no: A/HRC/24/18). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/24/18.

  • Vandiver, M. (1998). The impact of the death penalty on the families of homicide victims and of condemned prisoners. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 477–505). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, M., & Berardo, F. M. (2000). ‘It’s like dying every day’: The families of condemned prisoners. Families, Crime and Criminal Justice, 2, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhigang, Y. (2009). Abolition or retention: Rethinking the death penalty in China. Social Sciences in China, 30(2), 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinzow, H. M., Rheingold, A. A., Hawkins, A. O., Saunders, B. E., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2009). Losing a loved one to homicide: Prevalence and mental health correlates in a national sample of young adults. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(1), 20–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, O. P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India

    Sanjeev P. Sahni & Mohita Junnarkar

Authors
  1. Sanjeev P. Sahni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohita Junnarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev P. Sahni .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sahni, S.P., Junnarkar, M. (2020). Psychosocial Factors Associated with Death Penalty: Impact on Families of Victims, Families of Defendants and the “Others”. In: The Death Penalty. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3129-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation