Abstract
Complex multistage pedagogical activities may address different planes (temporal, social, physical) by different pedagogical strategies. Since there is no comprehensive technological support for all possible pedagogical practices, activity phases may be supported by different technologies, adapted to the specific needs of the stage. As a result, the implementation of such activities would be technologically “fragmented” since data collected with one system will not be available for immediate use in another environment. The technological fragmentation may not only obstruct the enactment of such activities but even discourage teachers and prevent them from designing rich pedagogical experiences supported by different technologies. Therefore, in order to provide a seamless learning experience, there is a need to ensure continuous data flow between the activity phases enacted with different technologies. This chapter presents our ongoing efforts to cope with the challenge of integrating various TEL environments in order to support the design and implementation of cross-context, multistage collaborative activities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, P. M. (2006). Virtual teamwork in very large undergraduate classes. Computers & Education, 47(2), 127–147.
Alexander, I., & Beus-Dukic, L. (2009). Discovering requirements: How to specify products and services. Chichester: Wiley.
Bordiés, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Alario-Hoyos, C., Ruiz-Calleja, A., & Subert, A. (2012). Reuse of data flow designs in complex and adaptive CSCL scripts: A case study. In Intelligent adaptation and personalization techniques in computer-supported collaborative earning (pp. 3–27). Berlin: Springer.
Chan, T.-W., Roschelle, J., His, S., Kinshuk, K., Sharples, M., Brown, T., Patton, C., Cherniavsky, J., Pea, R., Norris, C., Soloway, E., Balacheff, N., Scardamalia, M., Dillenbourg, P., Looi, C. K., Milrad, M., & Hoppe, U. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29.
Claycomb, C., & Frankwick, G. L. (2012). Buyers’ perspectives of buyer-seller relationship development. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2), 252–263.
Demetriadis, S., & Karakostas, A. (2008). Adaptive collaboration scripting: A conceptual framework and a design case study. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS’08 (pp. 487–492). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In New science of learning (pp. 525–552). New York: Springer.
Dillenbourg, P., Dimitriadis, Y., Nussbaum, M., Roschelle, J., Looi, C. K., Asensio, J. I., … & Tchounikine, P. (2012). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers and Education, 69(1), 485–492.
Hammer, R., Ronen, M., & Kohen-Vacs, D. (2010, June). Stressed yet motivated: Web-based peer assessed competition as an instructional approach in higher education. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 65–72). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Hernández-Leo, D., Harrer, A., Dodero, J., Asensio Pérez, J., & Burgos, D. (2007). A framework for the conceptualization of approaches to “create-by-reuse” of learning design solution. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13(7), 991–1001.
Hoppe, U. (2009, February). Technology-integrated learning scenarios – Issues and challenges. Lecture held at Växjö University.
Hoppe, U., Pinkwart, N., Oelinger, M., Zeini, S., Verdejo, F., Barros, B., & Mayorga, J. I. (2005, May). Building bridges within learning communities through ontologies and thematic objects. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 211–220). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Huang, Y. M., Chiu, P. S., Liu, T. C., & Chen, T. S. (2011). The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2291–2302.
King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 13–37). Springer.
Kohen-Vacs, D., Ronen, M., Ben Aharon, O., & Milrad, M. (2011). Incorporating mobile elements in collaborative pedagogical scripts. In Proceedings of the international conference on computers in education, ICCE.
Kohen-Vacs, D., Ronen, M., & Bar-Ness, O. (2012a). Integrating SMS components into CSCL scripts. In Seventh IEEE international conference on wireless, mobile and ubiquitous technology in education (WMUTE2012), Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan, 27–30 March, 2012, pp. 107–111.
Kohen-Vacs, D., Ronen, M., Bar-Ness, O., Milrad, M., & Kurti, A. (2012b). Integrating collaborative and mobile technologies for fostering learning about negotiation styles. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computer in education ICCE (pp. 403–407).
Milrad, M., Kohen-Vacs, D., Vogel, B., Ronen, M., & Kurti, A. (2011). An integrated approach for the enactment of collaborative pedagogical scripts using mobile rechnologies. In CSCL2011 conference proceedings: Volume II, short papers & posters (pp. 681–685).
Rahim, M. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376.
Ronen, M., & Kohen-Vacs, D. (2010). Modeling, enacting, sharing and reusing online collaborative pedagogy with CeLS. Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical perspectives, IGI Global, pp. 319–339.
Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Svensson, M., Pettersson, O., & Persson, M. (2008, August 30–31). Mobile collaboration tools and systems to support ubiquitous learning. In Proceedings of the fourth annual conference on collaboration technologies 2008, Wakayama, Japan.
Tchounikine, P. (2011). Computer science and educational software design: A resource for multidisciplinary work in technology enhanced learning. Berlin: Springer.
Vogel, B., Spikol, D., Kurti, A., & Milrad, M. (2010, April 12–16). Integrating mobile, web and sensory technologies to support inquiry-based science learning. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE international conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education WMUTE 2010 (pp. 65–72). Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Vogel, B., Kurti, A., Milrad, M., Johansson, E., & Muller, M. (2014). Mobile inquiry learning in Sweden: Development insights on interoperability, extensibility and sustainability of the LETS GO software system. Educational Technology and Society, 17(2), 43–57.
Wong, L.-H. (2012, October). Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity. Lecture held at Linnaeus University.
Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kohen-Vacs, D., Ronen, M. (2015). Fragmented yet Seamless: System Integration for Supporting Cross-Context CSCL Scripts. In: Wong, LH., Milrad, M., Specht, M. (eds) Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-112-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-113-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)