Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

  • 1940 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents an algorithm to design a decentralized robust controller for STATCOMs (static synchronous compensators) using minimax linear quadratic (LQ) output-feedback control design approach. There is an increase of the available (dynamic) transfer capability (ATC) of power systems with fixed-speed wind generators (FSWGs) due to the designed decentralized controllers. The effects of the integration of various types of wind generators into power systems based on transfer limit has also been analyzed in this chapter. The effectiveness of the suggested control strategy is validated by simulations on a benchmark two area power system. The performance of the designed controller is also compared with a conventional PI (proportional-integral)-based STATCOM controller. Simulation results show that both the dynamic voltage stability and the transient stability can be improved by the use of the robust STATCOM control presented in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rao KN, Amarnath J, Kumar KA (2007) Voltage constrained available transfer capability enhancement with FACTS devices. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ackermann T, Soder L (2002) An overview of wind energy-status 2002. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 6(1–2):67–128

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hossain MJ, Pota HR, Kumble C (2009) Transfer limit enhancement using decentralized robust STATCOM control for wind farm. In: Asia-Pacific power and energy engineering conference. Wuhan, China, pp 1446–1450

    Google Scholar 

  4. North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) (2000) Available transfer capability definitions and determination

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ayasum CA, Fischl R (1997) On the region-wise analysis of available transfer capability (ATC). In: Proceedings of North American power symposium (NAPS), Wyoming, pp 464–469

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klump RP, Overbye TJ (1996) A transmission-based voltage stability measure for available transfer capability (ATC) calculations. In: Proceedings of North American power symposium (NAPS), MIT, pp 351–357

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gravener MH, Nwankpa C (1999) Available transfer capability and first order sensitivity. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(2):512–518

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramezani M, Haghifam MR (2007) Modelling and evaluation of wind turbines on total transfer capability. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting. Tampa, FL, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canizares CA, Berizzi A, Marannino P (1998) Using FACTS controllers to maximize available transfer capability. In: Proceedings of bulk power system dynamics and control IV—restructuring. Santorini, Greece, pp 633–641

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao Y, Song YH, Liu CC, Sun YZ (2003) Available transfer capability enhancement using FACTS devices. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(1):305–312

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farahmand H, Roshidi-Nejad M, Fotirhi-Firoozabad M (2004) Implementation of FACTS devices for ATC enhancement using RPF technique. In: Proceedings of large engineering systems conference on power engineering, pp 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu X, Singh C, Jakovljevic S, Ristanovic D, Huang G (2003) Total transfer capability considering FACTS and security constraints. IEEE PES Trans Distrib Conf Exposition 1:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sadeghzadeh SM, Ehsan M, Said NH, Feuillet R (1998) Improvement of transient stability limit in power system transmission lines using fuzzy control of FACTS devices. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(3):917–922

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li L, Ugrinovskii VA, Orsi R (2007) Decentralized robust control of uncertain markov jump parameter systems via output feedback. Automatica 43(11):1932–1944

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tuglie ED, Iannone SM, Torelli F (2008) Feedback-linearization and feedback-feedforward decentralized control for multimachine power system. Electr Power Syst Res 78(3):382–391

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petersen IR, Ugrinovskii VA, Savkin AV (2000) Robust control design using \(H_{\infty }\) methods. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rao P, Crow ML, Yang Z (2000) STATCOM control for power system voltage control applications. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 15(4):1311–1317

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kundur P (1994) Power system stability and control. Mcgraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamoud G (2000) Assessment of available transfer capability of transmission systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(1):27–32

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar A, Srivastava SC (2002) AC power transfer distribution factors for allocating power transactions in a deregulated market. IEEE Power Eng Rev 22(7):42–43

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luo X, Patton AD, Singh C (2000) Real power transfer capability calculations using multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2): 903-908

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng Y, Chung TS, Chung CY, Yu CW (2006) Dynamic voltage stability constrained ATC calculation by a QSS approach. Int J Electr Power Energ Syst 28(6):408–412

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cutsem TV, Vournas C (1998) Voltage stability of electric power systems. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kueck J, Kirby B, Rizy T, Li F, Fall N (2006) Reactive power from distributed energy. Electr J 19(10):27–38

    Google Scholar 

  25. Athanasius GX, Pota HR, Subramanyam PB, Ugrinovskii V (2007) Robust power system stabiliser design using minimax control approach: validation using real-time digital simulation. In: 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 2427–2432

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fernandez L, Garcia C, Saenz JR, Jurado F (2009) Equivalent models of wind farms by using aggregated wind turbines and equivalent winds. Energ Convers Manag 50(3):691–704

    Google Scholar 

  27. Germond AJ, Podmore R (1978) Dynamic aggregation of generating unit models. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst PAS-97(4):1060–1069

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yoon MG, Ugrinovskii VA, Pszczel M (2007) Gain-scheduling of minimax optimal state feedback controllers for uncertain lpv systems. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 52(2):311–317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jahangir Hossain .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hossain, J., Pota, H.R. (2014). Control for Dynamic Transfer Capability Enhancement. In: Robust Control for Grid Voltage Stability: High Penetration of Renewable Energy. Power Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-116-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-116-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-115-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-116-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics