Abstract
The aim of this study has been to investigate the pedagogical practices of BGEs through a consideration of their guiding school visits aimed at engaging and supporting children’s learning of ecological science. As explained in Chap. 1, the rationale for conducting this research is that there is a gap in the literature regarding the nature of informal educator-guided school visits to botanic gardens. The practical outcomes of this study have allowed for an in-depth examination of the structure of guided visits and BGEs’ teaching practices, which addresses the aforementioned gap in the literature regarding school trips to botanic gardens and pedagogy in these informal contexts. Moreover, this contribution is important because it offers a close examination of the teaching and learning processes in an out-of-school setting that can assist schoolteachers’ preparations for conducting botanic garden visits. Further, the identification of the BGEs’ pedagogical behaviours has led to the development of a framework, which can aid or assist researchers in describing informal science educators’ practices as well as in carrying out further investigation in the field. Moreover, through carrying out this extensive in-depth fieldwork, it has been demonstrated that combined data collection methods can not only be employed in school classrooms (Stigler, Gonzales, Kawanka, Knoll, & Serrano, 1999) and/or museum sites (Allen, 2002; DeWitt & Osborne, 2007) but can also contribute to gathering rich data in complicated outdoor settings such as botanic gardens. The outcomes of this study enrich the understanding of the sociocultural theory of teaching and learning with respect to informal contexts, particularly by highlighting the importance of the interactions between the BGEs and students. More specifically, the study of the discourse that occurred during the guided visits enabled me to examine the detailed processes, wherein the BGEs supported and facilitated the children’s meaning making of ecological science. In this final chapter, the key findings are discussed in order to address the research questions (Sect. 7.1), and the practical and the theoretical implications of this study are also presented (Sect. 7.2). The limitations of the research are described and some directions for future research undertakings are identified (Sect. 7.3).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
My visit to the Singapore Botanic Gardens in November 2009 strengthened my perceptions of the games and role play for children’s environmental learning. The guided tour that I observed in Singapore was designed for 6–12-year-old children focusing on developing the general identification skills of tropical plants. In contrast to the visits observed in England, this tour integrated role play and games into a storyline—Sarah’s birthday. All the children were asked to act as Sarah’s friends who were looking for sources in the garden to make a ‘birthday gift’ for Sarah. During the tour, the BGE presented different plants to the children and encouraged them to collect some samples for a piece of art work. Then, the children were given some time to make the ‘birthday gift’ with the material they had collected during the tour. In the end, the children played a game (guessing the name of plants according to the ‘birthday gift’ they had made) to celebrate Sarah’s birthday. During my observation, I noted that the children were highly engaged and posed a lot of questions to the BGE.
References
Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, D., Piscitelli, B., Weier, K., Everett, M., & Tayler, C. (2002). Children’s museum experiences: Identifying powerful mediators of learning. Curator, 45(3), 213–231.
Anderson, L. M., Evertson, C. M., & Emmer, E. T. (1980). Dimensions in classroom management derived from recent research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12(4), 343–356.
Ash, D., & Wells, G. (2006). Dialogic inquiry in classroom and museum: Actions, tools and talk. In Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules, & D. S. Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 35–54). New York: Peter Lang.
Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2007). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91(1), 75–95.
Bedford, L. (2001). Storytelling: The real work of museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 44(1), 27–34.
BGCI. (2008). Mission statement. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://www.bgci.org/global/mission/
Brodie, K. (2009). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms. Dordrecht: Springer.
Carson, R. (1998). The sense of wonder. New York: HarperCollins.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Greenwood Press.
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.
Cornell, J. B. (1989). Sharing nature with children 2. Nevada City: Dawn Publications.
Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200–218.
Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent–child activity. Science Education, 85(6), 712–732.
Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357.
DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010). School trips and classroom lessons: An investigation into teacher-student talk in two settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 454–473.
DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science-focused school trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 685–710.
DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197.
DfES. (2006). Learning outside the classroom manifesto. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills (DfES) Publications.
Dillon, J., Morris, M., O’Donnell, L., Reid, A., Rickinson, M., & Scott, W. (2005). Engaging and learning with the outdoors: The final report of the outdoor classroom in a rural context action research project. London: National Foundation for Education Research.
Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
Evertson, C. M., Emmer, E. T., Sanford, J. P., & Clements, B. S. (1983). Improving classroom management: An experiment in elementary school classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 173–188.
Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76(1), 22–28.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whaleback.
Gilbert, J., & Priest, M. (1997). Models and discourse: A primary school science class visit to a museum. Science Education, 81(6), 749–762.
Grenier, R. S. (2009). The role of learning in the development of expertise in museum docents. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(2), 142–157.
Griffin, J. M. (1998). Learning science through practical experiences in museums. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 655–663.
Griffin, J. M. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1), S59–S70.
Griffin, J. M., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763–779.
Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. New York: Routledge.
Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28(1), 87–112.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53–83.
Jonassen, D. (2004). Towards a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 68–85.
Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluating development in children. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
King, H. (2009). Supporting natural history enquiry in an informal setting: A study of museum explainer practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). London, UK: King’s College London.
Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science trips. Science Education, 89(1), 936–955.
Klassen, S. (2009). The construction and analysis of a science story: A proposed methodology. Science & Education, 18(3–4), 401–423.
Kuh, L., Ponte, I. C., & Chau, C. (2010). Play behaviors before and after a natural playground installation in an early childhood setting. Somerville: Tufts University.
Lantolf, J. P. (2004). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lobato, J., Clarke, D., & Ellis, A. B. (2005). Initiating and eliciting in teaching: A reformulation of learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 101–136.
Malone, K. (2007). The bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 513–527.
Martin, M., Brown, S., & Russell, T. (1991). A study of child-adult interaction at a natural history centre. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 17(2–3), 355–369.
Matthews, M. R. (1989). History, philosophy, and science teaching: A brief review. Synthese, 80(1), 1–7.
Meredith, J. E., Fortner, R. W., & Mullins, G. W. (1997). Model of affective learning for nonformal science education facilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 805–818.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
National Research Council, U. S. (1992). Plant biology research and training for the 21 century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Negrete, A., & Lartigue, C. (2004). Learning from education to communicate science as a good story. Endeavour, 28(3), 120–124.
Nundy, S. (1999). The fieldwork effect: The role and impact of fieldwork in the upper primary school. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(2), 190–198.
Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. A. (2003). Questions in time investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198.
O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schools (pp. 63–103). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modelling. In P. Reiman & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 37–62). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Oikawa, J. (2000). Future role of living plant collections in gardens for biodiversity conservation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119.
Osborne, J. (1998). Constructivism in museums: A response. Journal of Museum Education, 23(1), 8–9.
Paris, S. G., Yambor, K. M., & Packard, B. (1998). Hands-on biology: A museum-school-university partnership for enhancing students’ interest and learning in science. The Elementary School Journal, 98(3), 267–288.
Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field-trip: Science programmes for elementary school groups at museum. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 505–519.
Ramey-Gassert, L., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Re-examining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78(4), 345–363.
Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London: National Foundation for Educational Research & King’s College London.
Roth, W.-M. (2001). Gestures: Their roles in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365–392.
Russell, I. (1990). Visiting a science centre: What’s on offer? Physics Education, 25(1), 258–262.
Schlossberg, M., Greene, J., Phillips, P. P., Johnson, B., & Parker, B. (2006). School trips Effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 337–346.
Scott, P. H. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45–80.
Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631.
Smithenry, D. W. (2010). Integrating guided inquiry into a traditional chemistry curricular framework. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13), 1689–1714.
Stavrova, O., & Urhahne, D. (2010). Modification of a school programme in the Deutsches museum to enhance students’ attitudes and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2291–2310.
Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P. A., Kawanka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Tal, T. (2012). Imitating the family visit: Small-group exploration in an ecological garden. In E. Davidsson & A. Jakobsson (Eds.), Understanding interactions at science centers and museums: Approaching sociocultural perspectives (pp. 193–206). Rotterdam: Sense.
Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2007). School visits to natural history museums: Teaching or enriching? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 747–769.
Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., & Austin, J. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory investigation. Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 87–111.
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Talking about plants: Comments of primary school groups looking at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 27–34.
Vergou, A. (2010). An exploration of botanic garden-school collaborations and student learning experiences. Ph.D. doctoral dissertation, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (2001). Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47(1), 2–9.
Wellington, J. (1990). Formal and informal learning in science: The role of the interactive science centres. Physics Education, 25(5), 247–253.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wilde, M., & Urhahne, D. (2008). Museum learning: A study of motivation and learning achievement. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 78–83.
Willison, J. (2006). Education for sustainable development: Guidelines for action in botanic gardens. Richmond: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Zubrowski, B. (2009). Exploration and meaning making in the learning of science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhai, J. (2015). Discussion, Reflections and Implications. In: Teaching Science in Out-of-School Settings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-591-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-591-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-590-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-591-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)