Skip to main content

A Method of Modern Chinese Irony Detection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics ((FiCL,volume 9))

Abstract

Irony is a kind of expressions whose literal meaning is the reversal of its real meaning. Although the understanding of ironies is considered as highly depend on the contextual information, there should be some cues in grammatical and semantical level. In this research, we try to find these linguistic cues by the observation of large scale corpora. We will find the frequently-used ironic constructions, then analyze the features and the generation mechanism of them. We notice that the intensity of ironic expressions relies on its immediacy of coercing the listener to experience the reversal. We conclude seven kinds of reversal in Chinese irony and summarize their formalized features. We also design an Irony Identification Procedure (IIP) to help us to detect ironies. In the future, we plan to classify the features and compare the efficiency of them by computational methods to get the quantized data, and then finally find an effective way to detect irony automatically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apter, M.J. 1984. Reversal theory and personality: A review. Journal of Research in Personality 18 (3): 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgers, C., M. Van Mulken, and P.J. Schellens. 2011. Finding irony: An introduction of the verbal irony procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26 (3): 186–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J.D. 1985/1988. On puns: The foundation of letters. Basil Blackwell/Internet-First University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., X.-Y. Jia, and J.-J. Chen. 2015. 邓钊, 贾修一, 陈家骏: Research on Chinese irony detection in microblog 面向微博的中文反语识别研究. Computer Engineering & Science 计算机工程与科学 37 (12): 2312–2317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, J. 2018. A lexical semantic study of Chinese opposites. Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A.E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Speech acts, vol. 3, ed. P. Cole, and J.L. Morgan, 4-1-58. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H.C., and I. Lily. 2014. Love in disguise: Incongruity between text and music in song. Journal of Pragmatics 62:136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-R. 2019. Double meaning and reversal: Toward an empirical linguistic account of irony. In 2019 Joint Conference of Linguistic Societies in Korea & The 26th Joint Workshop on Linguistics and Language Processing (JWLLP-26). Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanko, S.L., and P.M. Pexman. 2003. Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes 35 (3): 241–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. 2019. Chinese and counterfactual reasoning. In The Routledge handbook of Chinese applied linguistics, ed. H. Chu-Ren, M. Barbara, and J.-S. Zhuo. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., V. Sharma, and P. Bhattacharyya. 2015. Harnessing context incongruity for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, vol. 2, pp. 757–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, A.X. 2017. A corpus-based textual analysis of irony and sarcasm in scripted discourse. Doctoral dissertation. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv, S.-X., and S.-S. Ding (eds.). 2016. 吕叔湘, 丁声树 编撰: Modern Chinese dictionary 现代汉语词典. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press 商务印书馆.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. Philosophy 3: 143–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, G.J., A.G. Dorst, J.B. Herrmann, A.A. Kaal, T. Krennmayr, and T. Pasma. 2010. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU, 25–42. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su, I.W., and S. Huang. 2019. An overview and a case study. In The Routledge handbook of Chinese applied linguistics, ed. C.R. Huang, Z. Jing-Schmidt, and B. Meisterernst. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y.-J., and H.-H. Chen. 2014. Chinese irony corpus construction and ironic structure analysis. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1269–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 116 (10): 1722–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., and D. Sperber. 2012. Explaining irony. Meaning and Relevance, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, W.-D., et al. 2016. 詹卫东 等: Processing specification of contemporary Chinese construction knowledge base现代汉语构式知识库填写规范. Department of Chinese Language and Literature of Peking University, Center for Chinese Linguistics of Peking University, Key Laboratory of Computational Linguistics of Peking University北京大学中文系, 北京大学中国语言学研究中心, 北京大学计算语言学教育部重点实验室, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An-Ran Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Peking University Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, AR., Huang, CR. (2020). A Method of Modern Chinese Irony Detection. In: Su, Q., Zhan, W. (eds) From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct. Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, vol 9. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9240-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9240-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9239-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9240-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics